Zichronos book cover Zichronos is in print! Order your copy on Amazon
DAYS ON THE JEWISH CALENDAR: SIVAN

Shabbat Matan Torah

How the comparison of Torah to water and bread reveals why Torah study surpasses every other mitzvah.

Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Sivan · 16:30

Examines why the Gemara compares Torah study to both water and bread, drawing on the Shlah's principle that the Torah's essential subject is the spiritual worlds while its physical narratives are only a garment. Traces how mitzvot function as this world's expression of Hashem's own actions, and how the parable of Shlomo Hamelech's three thousand meshalim explains why even the Torah's most mundane discussions of oxen and lost objects encode the deepest chochmah. Concludes that Torah study, unlike other mitzvot, unites a person's mind with that chochmah the way food becomes one with the body.

Audio Transcript
Why Learning Torah Outweighs Every Other Mitzvah

During those weeks that we learn in the Torah about 讬爪讬讗转 诪爪专讬诐 or about 诪转谉 转讜专讛, which in essence 讬爪讬讗转 诪爪专讬诐 is also part of 诪转谉 转讜专讛, because when the Yidden went out of 诪爪专讬诐, the purpose was in order to receive the Torah. As the 驻住讜拽 says, 讘讛讜爪讬讗讱 讗转 讛注诐 讛讝讛 诪诪爪专讬诐 转注讘讚讜谉 讗转 讛讗诇拽讬诐 注诇 讛讛专 讛讝讛. Hashem said to Moshe Rabbeinu, when the Yidden will go out of 诪爪专讬诐, they will go to serve Hashem on this mountain, meaning that the purpose of 讬爪讬讗转 诪爪专讬诐 is for 诪转谉 转讜专讛. So during the weeks when we learn in the Torah, in the 驻专砖讬讜转 of 讬爪讬讗转 诪爪专讬诐 or the 驻专砖讬讜转 of 诪转谉 转讜专讛, it is worthwhile to discuss a little bit the mitzvah of 诇讬诪讜讚 讛转讜专讛. We know that the mitzvah of learning Torah is the greatest mitzvah, as it says 讜转诇诪讜讚 转讜专讛 讻谞讙讚 讻讜诇诐. Learning Torah is the most important one. So it's worthwhile to look a little bit into the importance of learning Torah, not only the way it is 讻驻砖讜讟讜, simply, the way it's explained in halachah, and also the way it's explained in 住驻专讬 讚专讜砖, in 讚专讜砖 住驻专讬诐, also the way it's explained in 住驻专讬 诪讜住专, but also a little bit deeper, the way it's explained in 住驻专讬 讞住讬讚讜转. It says in the Gemara in Bava Kama 讚祝 讬\"讝 注诪讜讚 讗' that 讗讬谉 诪讬诐 讗诇讗 转讜专讛, that water refers to Torah. The Gemara also says in Ta'anit 讚祝 讝' 注诪讜讚 讗' that 谞诪砖诇讜 讚讘专讬 转讜专讛 诇诪讬诐, that the Torah was compared to water. We also find that Torah is compared to bread, as it says in the Gemara 砖讘转 讚祝 拽\"讻 注诪讜讚 讗', in Chagigah 讚祝 讬\"讚 注诪讜讚 讗'. It's also brought down in the Tikkunei Zohar in the beginning, in 转讬拽讜谉 讙' also, in Midrashim, for instance in Bereshit Rabbah 驻专砖讛 诪\"讙 讜', and in other places, that Torah is compared to bread. Now we know when the Torah compares something to something else, obviously is because the two things have something in common. So obviously there is something in the Torah which is compared to 诪讬诐, and there's also something in the Torah which is compared to 诇讞诐. To understand this, we have to bring in what it says in the Shlah.

The Shlah on Torah's True Home in the Higher Worlds

He writes in his part Asarah Maamarot, in the 诪讗诪专 讞拽讜专 讛讚讬谉, 讞诇拽 讙' 驻专拽 讻\"讜, that he says 讛转讜专讛 诪讚讘专转 讘注爪诐 讘注诇讬讜谞讬诐, 讜专讜诪讝转 讘砖谞讬讬诐 讘转讞转讜谞讬诐. Which means the Torah essentially speaks about things of 注诇讬讜谞讬诐, of higher worlds so to speak, spiritual things, and is meramez and hints 讘转讞转讜谞讬诐 as a second step down here. Which is more than what the Ramban says in the beginning of Bereshit, that 讛讻转讜讘 讬讙讬讚 讘转讞转讜谞讬诐 讜讬专诪讜讝 讘注诇讬讜谞讬诐, that the pasuk, the Torah speaks about things of down here, of this world, but it is meramez, it hints to the way things are in the higher worlds. But the Shlah says, and obviously he's not arguing against the Ramban, he's just adding a depth to what the Ramban said, that it's not only that it's a remez to the things the way they are in the 注诇讬讜谞讬诐, but he says even more, the main part of the Torah, the essence of the Torah is the way it's 讘注诇讬讜谞讬诐, and the way we have the Torah, the Torah was brought down to be meramez, to hint to certain things the way they are down here. Which means, as it's self-understood, that certainly 讗讬谉 诪拽专讗 讬讜爪讗 诪讬讚讬 驻砖讜讟讜. The pasuk cannot be taken away and any part of the Torah cannot be taken away from its simple peshat, as the Gemara says in 砖讘转 讚祝 住\"讙 注诪讜讚 讗'. And we can't say chas v'shalom that the Torah means only the way the things are in ruchniyut, in spiritual worlds. As is explained in the Rashba, 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 讛专砖讘\"讗 讞诇拽 讗' 住讬诪谉 转拽讟\"讝. The Torah always has the simple peshat, and that's the way we have to learn it. But in addition to the simple peshat, we have to know that essentially the Torah speaks about spiritual matters, and it is brought down into this world, put into physical matters. And that is really self-understood, because we know the Torah is Chochmato shel HaKadosh Baruch Hu. The Torah is the chochmah of Hashem. And therefore, we have to say that the way the chochmah of Hashem is, the way it's mitzad Hashem, this is completely considering 注谞讬谞讬诐 专讜讞谞讬讬诐. But Hashem was malbish the Torah, put the Torah into the levush, the way it comes down into this world, the way we learn it, is in the levush of the 讙砖诪讬讜转讚讬拽注 things.

Mitzvot as This World's Expression of What Hashem Does

And the truth is there is a clear 诪讗诪专 讞讝\"诇 that teaches us that. It says in Shemot Rabbah 驻专砖讛 诇' 讟', and also in Yerushalmi Rosh Hashanah 驻专拽 讗' 讛诇讻讛 讙', considering the 驻住讜拽 诪讙讬讚 讚讘专讬讜 诇讬注拽讘 讞拽讬讜 讜诪砖驻讟讬讜 诇讬砖专讗诇, which means that He teaches His words to 讬注拽讘, and His chukim and mishpatim to 讬砖专讗诇. So it says there, 讛拽讚讜砖 讘专讜讱 讛讜讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 注讜砖讛 讛讜讗 讗讜诪专 诇讬砖专讗诇 诇注砖讜转 讜诇砖诪讜专. That what He does, He tells us. In other words, the mitzvot and the Torah that He gave us is what He does. Now the way He does it definitely it's not in a physical way. So therefore, we must say that what we do is an extension of what he does. So essentially, the mitzvah is the way he does it, which is in a spiritual way, and it came down in a physical way. The truth is 讛诪注砖讛 讛讜讗 讛注讬拽专. As far we're concerned, we have to do the mitzvah the way it is 讘诪注砖讛, in the physical action. But nevertheless, we have to remember that Hashem wants us to do it that way we have to do it, but in it is dressed essentially the spiritual part of it. The same thing is with Torah. 转讜专讛 诇讗 讘砖诪讬诐 讛讬讗. The Torah was given down to this world, and therefore we have to learn it the way it's down here. But we have to know that within way we learn it, when we learn about the physical matters, for instance we learn about 砖讜专 砖谞讙讞 讗转 讛驻专讛, we're talking about an ox, in it essentially is hidden the spiritual explanation of the Torah, and that was being melubash, that was covered and dressed into the way we learn it. As the 驻住讜拽 says in 诪砖诇讬, 拽讗驻讬讟诇 讞' 驻住讜拽 诇', 讜讗讛讬讛 讗爪诇讜 砖注砖讜注讬诐. The Torah is saying, \"I was the toy, so to speak, of Hashem.\" So the Torah is the way it's by Hashem. The Gemara says in 砖讘转 讚祝 驻\"讞 注诪讜讚 讘' that the Torah was called a 讞诪讜讚讛 讙谞讜讝讛 砖讙谞讜讝讛 诇讱, that this was a hidden treasure by Hashem. So the Torah is the way it's by Hashem, which is definitely not physical. From the way it's in the spiritual way, it came down to the physical world, as it says in the pasuk in Yisro, 拽讗驻讬讟诇 讻' 驻住讜拽 讬\"讟, and the same is in Va'eschanan, 拽讗驻讬讟诇 讚' 驻住讜拽 诇\"讜, 诪谉 讛砖诪讬诐 讚讘专转讬 注诪讻诐, 诪谉 讛砖诪讬诐 讛砖诪讬注讱 讗转 拽讜诇讜, and then it came down to the 讗专抓. So it came down from the 砖诪讬诐 to the 讗专抓. As it is explained in the 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 of the Ram"a miPano, 住讬诪谉 注\"讙, there he explains what the Gemara says in Chullin 讚祝 爪' 注诪讜讚 讘' that sometimes 讚讘专讛 转讜专讛 讘诇砖讜谉 讛讘讗讬. The Torah speaks in words which really are not true, they're just an exaggeration, so to speak. And the Gemara says this concerning the pasuk where it says 讻讬 注专讬诐 讙讚讜诇讜转 讜讘爪讜专讜转 讘砖诪讬诐. It refers to the cities of Eretz Yisrael, that they are big cities and they are set up to into the 砖诪讬诐. So the Gemara says this is just an exaggeration, because the cities didn't go up to 砖诪讬诐. And he says it means 讻诪砖诪注讜, that they are 讘爪讜专讜转 讘砖诪讬诐, these cities of Eretz Yisrael are connected directly to 砖诪讬诐, meaning that it doesn't pass through the 注' 砖专讬诐. We know the other parts of the world, each part has a 砖专, has a certain 诪诇讗讱 which is 诪诪讜谞讛, which is appointed on that part. But the cities of Eretz Yisrael, he says, they are higher than the 注' 砖专讬诐, and 讗讬谉 注' 砖专讬诐 砖诇 诪注诇讛, he says, 谞讻谞住讬诐 讘讗讜讬专讛 砖诇 讗专抓 讬砖专讗诇. That in the 讗讜讬专, in the air of Eretz Yisrael, this 注' 砖专讬诐 can't go. So these cities are 讘爪讜专讜转 讘砖诪讬诐. And he explains there that the word 讛讘讗讬 that the Gemara says is abbreviation of 讛谞讛 讘专讻讜 讗转 讛砖诐, to show that there is really nothing, no 讚讘专 讘讟诇 in the Torah, because in 专讜讞谞讬讜转 everything has an explanation. But as we said, this doesn't, chas veshalom, take away from the way the Torah is by us, that we have it in a physical form, because the physical form is only the levush in which Hashem put in the essence of the Torah, which is similar to a mashal.

Nothing in the Torah Is Superfluous: The Parable of Shlomo Hamelech's 3,000 Meshalim

We know that the Torah is called 诪砖诇 讛拽讚诪讜谞讬. As Rashi brings in Parshas Mishpatim, 诪砖诇 讛拽讚诪讜谞讬 means it is the mashal of the 拽讚诪讜谞讜 砖诇 注讜诇诐, it is the parable, the mashal of Hashem, because the Torah, the way we have it, is a mashal which explains the real thoughts the way they are in the mind, so to speak, of Hashem. What is the concept of a mashal? Let's explain what a mashal is. There's a 驻住讜拽 that says concerning Shlomo Hamelech, 讜讬讚讘专 砖诇诪讛 砖诇砖转 讗诇驻讬诐 诪砖诇, that Shlomo spoke 3,000 mashalim. The Gemara says concerning Rabbi Meir that 诪砖诪转 专讘 诪讗讬专, 讘讟诇讜 诪讜砖诇讬 诪砖诇讬诐, that after Rabbi Meir passed away, there were no more people that were able to give a mashal. 诇讻讗讜专讛, what is so special about a mashal, giving a parable, that after Rabbi Meir no one could give a parable? Shlomo Hamelech said 3,000 mashalim. There were people in our generation that are also able to find interesting mashalim. If you have a good talent to it, then you're able to find a mashal to many things. So what's so special about giving a mashal? The peshat is not that Shlomo Hamelech in his lifetime gave 3,000 meshalim. So it says in sefarim, the pshat is that Shlomo Hamelech's thoughts, his ideas were so deep that in order to explain it to an ordinary person, he had to give 3,000 meshalim, and not 3,000 different meshalim, but 3,000 levels of meshalim. Sometimes there's a very deep idea that the only way you could explain it is by giving a mashal. Now sometimes the mashal itself is deep, and you have to give a mashal to that mashal, and sometimes that mashal is still too deep, and you go on and on, you give a mashal to a mashal. Shlomo Hamelech's thoughts were so deep that in order for an ordinary person to understand He would have to give 3,000 meshalim. It would have to go down 3,000 levels. Now, if a person would look in the last level and compare it to the first level, the way the thought was originally, he might say they're two different ideas. Because if it went through 3,000 stages, then definitely you can't see the connection between the last one and the first one. But the truth is, that the last stage, the lowest one, in it, it itself really is the thought of the first stage. If it wouldn't be, then we wouldn't call it a mashal, then this is not a mashal to what was said in the beginning, then this is a new idea. Being that we're not saying that this is a new idea, this is just a mashal to what's said before, the pshat is that in this mashal, really, if a person would be able to understand it, he would see that this mashal is just a way of expressing the original thought, even though when you look at it you can't see the comparison. And that's why it says concerning Rav Meir, he was able to give meshalim. It doesn't mean that just he had a talent in giving meshalim. His thoughts were so deep, as the Gemara actually says that he was the deepest of all the 讞讻诪讬诐, 讜诇讗 讬专讚讜 讞讻诪讬诐 诇住讜祝 讚注转讜, the chachamim couldn't even understand the depth of his understanding, so he had to give meshalim in order to explain himself. And each thought that he had, that he said, he would have to explain it with a lower level, many, many levels in order for ordinary people to understand it. But still, in the lowest level, in essence, this is the same as the first level. And therefore, for instance, Shlomo Hamelech himself, when he looked at the lowest level of his meshalim, to him, this wasn't a cover-up on his thought, adrabah, to him the lowest level of the mashal in itself expressed the same thing as the first level, even though the outside of it, the superficial part of it looked different. And the same is with the Torah. The Torah, the way we have it, and when we learn about 砖讜专 砖谞讙讞 讗转 讛驻专讛, or we learn 砖谞讬诐 讗讜讞讝讬谉 讘讟诇讬转, whatever we learn about the physical things, this is the same thoughts the way they are in the mind of Hashem, in the 专讜讞谞讬讜转'讚讬拽注 way, but the way it is expressed to us, so we should be able to relate to it, it is put into these words, which in essence, this is the chochmah of Hashem, the expression of the same chochmah like we said concerning the mashal of Shlomo Hamelech. And the truth is, if you want to go a step further, there is no other way to explain it but to say that the essence of the Torah is 专讜讞谞讬讜转, and the way it came down to us is only an expression that we should be able to relate to, because we know that the 转讜专讛 拽讚诪讛 诇注讜诇诐, the Torah came before the world. Now, all the physical things are all part of the world, part of the creation. If the Torah is there before the creation, so how can we say that the essence of the Torah are these physical things? If an ox was created, and the Torah came before creation, so how can the Torah talk about an ox? So we must say the Torah, everything in the Torah, every word of the Torah, essentially is in ruchniyut. It came down to us in the form of 砖讜专 砖谞讙讞 讗转 讛驻专讛, but these words, 砖讜专 砖谞讙讞 讗转 讛驻专讛, are have in it and are the same chochmah of Hashem the way they are in the spiritual sense. And this is one reason why the Torah is compared to water, as the Gemara says there in Ta'anit, that 诪讛 诪讬诐 讬讜专讚讬诐 诪诪拽讜诐 讙讘讜讛 诇诪拽讜诐 谞诪讜讱, just like water goes from a high place to a low place, the Torah, too, went down from the highest place and came down to the lowest, didn't change, chas v'shalom, it's the same Torah the way it's by 讛砖诐, 讞讻诪转讜 砖诇 讛拽讚讜砖 讘专讜讱 讛讜讗, just was put into this levush that we could relate to.

How Torah Study Unites the Mind with Hashem's Chochmah

So from that, one can understand that when a person learns Torah, not only does he understand the sevara of the ox that gored the 驻专讛, and the halachah is so and so, but when he understands that, he grasps actually the depth of the chochmah of Hashem the way they are on the highest spiritual levels. And this sechel that a person understands becomes one with a person. Because as we know, this is the difference between when a person understands something 诇讙讘讬 anything else. Anytime when a person does something or gets close to something, there still remains two things. When a person does something, there's the person who does it, but when a person understands something in his mind, the unity between the person and the thought he understands are one. That thought becomes part of his mind. Now that now that we said that when a person understands Torah, he understands the deepest spiritual inyanim, just covered up in the levush of whatever he understands, that becomes one with a person. That's why the Torah is compared to bread. Just like food becomes the person, not like a garment, which covers the person, so it is close to him, etc., etc., but it's not one with him, food becomes one with the person. And the same is with Torah. When you learn Torah, the Torah becomes one with the person. That's why the pasuk says, 讜转讜专转讱 讘转讜讱 诪注讬, Your Torah is in my stomach. Just like food goes into the stomach and becomes one with the person, so, too, does the sechel of Torah become one with the person. And being that we said that the sechel of Torah, even though it might be talking about a garment, about an ox, about anything else, really, this in itself talks about the most spiritual matters, and this becomes one with the a person, so we could imagine what happens when a person learns Torah. He becomes one with the most spiritual inyanim the way they are in the brain k'vayachol of Hashem. This is one of the explanations why 转诇诪讜讚 转讜专讛 讻谞讙讚 讻讜诇诐. Learning Torah is more important even than doing mitzvot. Because when you do a mitzvah, we know that through a mitzvah you get close to Hashem, but still the person doesn't become the mitzvah. The person does the mitzvah. But when you learn Torah, the person's brain is one with the 砖讻诇 of the Torah, so the person, so to speak, becomes the Torah. And what is the Torah? As we said before, the 讞讻诪讛 of Hashem. And as we said before, even the way we learn the Torah, which deals with physical things, it really is the most spiritual thoughts the way they are in the 讞讻诪讛 of Hashem, and that's what we get united with. So therefore we understand the importance of learning Torah, that through learning Torah, we become actually one with the thoughts of Hashem, with the 讞讻诪讛 of Hashem, not only the way they are 诪诇讜讘砖 in this world, but also the way they are in their source, the way they are 讘注诇讬讜谞讬诐.

← PREVIOUS
Month of Sivan: Part 3
NEXT →
2 Sivan
NOW PLAYING Choose a shiur to begin Rabbi Yehuda Leib Schapiro
0:00
0:00