Simchat Torah: Part 2
Why Is the Torah Finished on Simchat Torah, Not Shavuot?
Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Tishrei · 16:40
Shavuot is when the Torah was actually given, so it would make sense to celebrate finishing it there instead. A look at why that joy is saved for right after Yom Kippur, and how it connects to the three stages of a Jew's relationship with Torah and mitzvot: belief, receiving, and finally doing.
Audio Transcript
We all know that on Simchat Torah the simchah is so great that it's greater than the simchah of any other Yom Tov. And the simple reason why the simchah is so great on Simchat Torah is because, as it says in Shulchan Aruch, it says in the Tur Orach Chaim 住讬诪谉 转专住\"讟 and also brought down in the Rema in 住讬诪谉 转专住\"讟, and it's also based on a Tikkunei Zohar 转讬拽讜谉 讻\"讗, that this is 诇驻讬 砖诪住讬讬诪讬谉 讘讜 讛转讜专讛 讜专讗讜讬 诇砖诪讜讞 讘住讬讜诪讛. Since on that day we finish the Torah, therefore it's proper, it fits that we should be very happy when we make a siyum on the Torah. But then there's a famous question that asks: Why was it set up so that the siyum of the Torah should be done on Simchat Torah, which is in connection to Shemini Atzeret, why not in Chag HaShavuot? Shavuot is the day that Hashem gave us the Torah. The whole celebration of the Yom Tov Shavuot is the celebration of Matan Torah. So wouldn't it make more sense that it should be set up such a way that the 住讬讜诐 讛转讜专讛 should be done on Chag HaShavuot, in connection to the giving of the 诇讜讞讜转, to the giving of the Torah? And the answer that's given is because the simchah of Simchat Torah is in connection to the giving of the 诇讜讞讜转 砖谞讬讜转 on Yom Kippur. We know that on Yom Kippur Hashem gave the second 诇讜讞讜转. As the Mishnah says in Masechta Taanit 讚祝 讻\"讜 注诪讜讚 讘', 讜讘讬讜诐 讞转讜谞转讜 讝讛 诪转谉 转讜专讛, the day of Hashem's chatunah is Matan Torah. And as Rashi says, it refers to Yom Kippur, the day when Hashem gave the second 诇讜讞讜转. So therefore, being that the second 诇讜讞讜转 were given after the Yidden did teshuvah of the 讞讟讗 讛注讙诇, so therefore the simchah in connection to the second luchot is greater. And therefore, on Simchat Torah, which is together with Shemini Atzeret, which comes as a continuation and after Yom Kippur, which is the time of the second luchot, that's why that's when we have the end of the Torah, and that's when the simchah is so great.
But be'emet we have to understand: we know takeh that Shemini Atzeret is considered a 专讙诇 讘驻谞讬 注爪诪讜, a separate Yom Tov, as the Gemara says in 住讜讻讛 讚祝 诪\"讞 注诪讜讚 讗' and in many places. But nevertheless, the Torah does call it 讬讜诐 讛砖诪讬谞讬, the eighth day. Obviously, it's in continuation to the first seven days of Sukkot. And therefore, whatever we explain concerning the simchah of Shemini Atzeret and Simchat Torah, we must find something similar to that in the simchah of the seven days of Sukkot. Being the seven days of Sukkot and the eighth day, and then automatically the ninth day, which is the Yom Tov Sheni of the eighth, automatically have the same inyan. Now that we explain that the simchah of Simchat Torah and Shemini Atzeret is a simchah in connection to the giving of the second luchot on Yom Kippur, so obviously the simchah that we have during the seven days of Sukkot also have something to do with this inyan of giving the second luchot on Yom Kippur. So we have to understand in which way do we see the connection between the simchah that we have on Chag HaSukkot to the simchah of giving of the second luchot that took place on Yom Kippur, which is the simchah of Shemini Atzeret and Simchat Torah?
So one of the explanations that can be said is as follows: Concerning the fact that on Sukkot the simchah is very great, and that's why only on Sukkos we say 讝诪谉 砖诪讞转谞讜, even though all Yamim Tovim you have to be b'Simcha, they're all 诪讜注讚讬诐 诇砖诪讞讛, nevertheless we only say on 住讜讻讜转 讝诪谉 砖诪讞转谞讜. So the simcha on Sukkos is a greater simcha than any other Yom Tov, as the Rambam says in 讛诇讻讜转 诇讜诇讘 驻专拽 讞' 讛诇讻讛 讬\"讘, there was a 砖诪讞讛 讬转讬专讛, and in 讛诇讻讛 讬\"讚 there he says 诪爪讜讛 诇讛专讘讜转 讘砖诪讞讛 讝讜. So there was a special simcha on Sukkos. What is the reason why there is a special simcha on Sukkos more than on Pesach and on Shavuos? So the reason is because concerning Sukkos we find in the Torah three times the din of simcha. Concerning Shavuos we only find in the Torah the inyan of simcha once. Concerning Pesach the Torah does not mention the word simcha at all; we just learn it out from the other Yamim Tovim. So therefore, Sukkos, where the Torah tells us the inyan of simcha three times, the simcha is greater. The other two Yamim Tovim it's not so great. What is the explanation for this? Why is it that the Torah tells us the inyan of simcha on Sukkos more than the simcha of Pesach and Shavuos? So the Midrash, in Yalkut Shimoni 驻专砖转 讗诪讜专 专诪讝 转专谞\"讚, which is really taken from the Pesikta de-Rav Kahana, the last part, the last piece there, the inyan of Sukkos, so explains that this is connected to the differences between the Yamim Tovim that's connected to the 转讘讜讗讛 of the field, that's connected to the grain that grows in the field. Pesach is called in 讞讜诪砖 讞讜讚砖 讛讗讘讬讘, and it says in the pasuk in 驻专砖转 讘讗 拽驻讬讟诇 讬\"讙 驻住讜拽 讚', in 驻专砖转 诪砖驻讟讬诐 拽驻讬讟诇 讻\"讙 驻住讜拽 讟\"讜, in 驻专砖转 讻讬 转砖讗 拽驻讬讟诇 诇\"讚 驻住讜拽 讬\"讞, so in many places. Pesach is called 讞讜讚砖 讛讗讘讬讘, which means that's the time when the grain is starting to become ripe, but it's not really ripe completely. Therefore, the simchah is not so great then, because then we're still not sure what's going to happen to the 转讘讜讗讛, whether it's going to come out the way we want it to be. Shavuos already is called 讞讙 讛拽爪讬专, as the pasuk says in 诪砖驻讟讬诐 拽驻讬讟诇 讻状讙 驻住讜拽 讟状讝, and in 驻专砖转 讻讬 转砖讗, etc., etc. It's the Yom Tov when we already cut the grain. So it's the time when the grain is finished and we cut it already, therefore the simchah starts then. Therefore the Torah mentions simchah by Shavuos. On the other hand, it's not a complete simchah, since the grain is not yet at home, it's still in the field, and it wasn't gathered together, at least most of it was not gathered together, in a way that you should be able to use it already. Therefore the simchah is not complete. Sukkos is called 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, as the pasuk says in 诪砖驻讟讬诐 there 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, and it says 讘讗住驻讱 讗转 诪注砖讬讱 诪谉 讛砖讚讛, when you will gather already your actions, the things that you did from the field. Then already we gather all the 转讘讜讗讛 together from the field, and you bring it into the storage, into the house. So since then the grain is already ready, you could use it already, then the simchah is complete. And therefore the Torah says three times the word simchah concerning Sukkos and Sukkos there's the greatest simchah. Lichorah, this reason would only apply at the time when Yidden were in Eretz Yisrael and everyone had his own field, and the occupation of most of the Yidden was concerning the grain of the field. So mimela by them, the simchah of Yom Tov would depend on the grain of the field. But since we know the Torah is 谞爪讞讬, Torah is eternal, so everything it says in the Torah and all the reasons given in the Torah are eternal, so they apply at all times, in all places. So the reason that's given that the simchah of Sukkos is in connection to the tevuah of the field must be eternal, must apply nowadays too. But as we could understand, it doesn't necessarily mean it has to apply in a physical way, it could apply in a spiritual way. And the truth is it could, because this inyan of tevuah also applies to ruchniyus. In ruchniyus, what is the inyan of tevuah? Tevuah, which is grain, bread is made from tevuah, and bichlal it refers to everything that grows on the trees, this refers to Torah u'mitzvos. Concerning Torah, the Gemara says in Sanhedrin 讚祝 诪状讘 注诪讜讚 讗壮 that Torah is called tevuah, as explained in Tosafos there. The Gemara also says in Chagigah 讚祝 讬状讚 注诪讜讚 讗壮, based on the pasuk in Mishlei, that Torah is called lechem. And the Gemara says in Sotah 讚祝 诪状讜 注诪讜讚 讗壮, 诪讗讬 驻讬专讜转? 诪爪讜讜转. What are fruit? 诪爪讜讜转. So we see that things that grow, the grain and the fruit, etc., etc., this is the tevuah of the Yidden, and this could apply to every Yid in all times. And these three seasons, 讞讜讚砖 讛讗讘讬讘, and 讞讙 讛拽爪讬专, and 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, they are three steps in the growth of the spiritual tevuah in the life of the Am Yisrael. Later on, when the Yidden entered Eretz Yisrael, then it was 谞砖转诇砖诇, so to speak, it also expressed itself in the physical tevuah of the Yidden. But really this refers to the spiritual tevuah of Yidden.
Now how we, do we explain the three Yomim Tovim of 讞讜讚砖 讛讗讘讬讘, 讞讙 讛拽爪讬专, and 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, which is Pesach, Shavuos, and Sukkos, in connection to the growth of the spiritual 转讘讜讗讛 of the Yidden, which is the Torah u'Mitzvos? And the explanation is very simple. Chag HaMatzos, which is the time of Yetzias Mitzrayim, that expresses the beginning and the foundation of a Yid's Avodas Hashem. By Yetzias Mitzrayim, the Yidden, seeing all these miracles, what it brought about in them was the Inyan of Emunah. As the Pasuk says, 讜讬专讗 讬砖专讗诇, they saw what happened to the 诪爪专讬诐, 讜讬讗诪讬谞讜 讘讛壮, so they believed in Hashem. Emunah, the belief in Hashem, is the foundation of Avodas Hashem. On the other hand, this is only the foundation, but this is not Avodas Hashem itself, which means Avodas Hashem is 诪爪讜讜转 讘驻讜注诇, you actually have to do the Mitzvos, you have to actually learn Torah. But at the time of Yetzias Mitzrayim, this didn't, this didn't happen yet. As it was physically that Yetzias Mitzrayim took place before the Inyan of Torah u'Mitzvos was given to the Yidden, so Yetzias Mitzrayim is only the foundation. It's the Inyan of Emunah, which is the foundation of Torah u'Mitzvos of Yiddishkeit. But based on the Emunah, then you have to do Torah u'Mitzvos. And Bichlal we know that Emunah itself is not enough, as the Gemara says in Berachos 讚祝 住状讙 注诪讜讚 讗壮 that 讙谞讘讗 讗驻讜诐 诪讞转专转讗 专讞诪谞讗 拽专讬讗, a Ganav, when he's going to steal, he calls to Hashem, he also has Emunah in Hashem that Hashem could help him, he davens to Hashem. And at the same time he goes to steal, he doesn't do what Hashem wants him to do, he doesn't keep the mitzvah of not stealing. Because it could be that the emunah does not penetrate into the actions of the person, doesn't make the person act accordingly. So emunah is just the yesod, and that's the inyan of Pesach. So it's similar to the inyan of the 转讘讜讗讛 that it starts growing, 讞讜讚砖 讛讗讘讬讘, but you don't have it yet. Comes Shavuos, which is 讝诪谉 诪转谉 转讜专转谞讜, the time when Hashem gave the Torah and the Yidden accepted it upon themselves by saying 谞注砖讛 讜谞砖诪注. This is similar to the second step, when you cut the 转讘讜讗讛, which means you already have it, but you can't use it yet, it's not brought to the house yet, it's not brought to the storage, but you have it already. So the Yidden at that time had it, because they were mekabel already 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转, but it wasn't the 诪注砖讛 讛诪爪讜讜转, they didn't do it yet. At that time, all they did, they received the they accepted it upon themselves. So it's a second step after the inyan of emunah, because by emunah you don't have it at all, here you have it, but you didn't do it yet. When it comes to Chag HaSukkos, that's already a time when a certain amount of time passed after Shavuos, and a Yid already at that time did 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转. Certain different circumstances came about, because there are a few months between Shavuos and Sukkos, and a Yid followed 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转, so he already he did the 诪注砖讛 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转. This is similar to the third thing, the idea of gathering the 转讘讜讗讛 into your house and having it already. And as the pasuk says, \"讜讗住驻讱 讗转 诪注砖讬讱 诪谉 讛砖讚讛\", when you gather your maasim, then already you have your actions, that that's the time already when the 转讘讜讗讛, which is 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转, is already acted out, and it is already in the possession of a Yid in a way that he could do it.
And the truth is we go a step further. In between Shavuos and Sukkos, the 讞讟讗 讛注讙诇 took place. After Hashem give the Torah, the Yidn sinned with the 讞讟讗 讛注讙诇. And what happened afterwards? The Yidn did teshuvah. The fact that the Yidn did teshuvah, this shows even more the fact that the Yidn have Torah u'mitzvot already 讘诪注砖讛 and they're already doing Torah u'mitzvot. Because by the fact that the Yidn did teshuvah, that shows how deep within the Yid the inyan of Torah u'mitzvot penetrated. It's so deep that even if he went away from Torah u'mitzvot, he still gets back to it. If it wouldn't be so deep, so as long as he has it he has it, when it's away, finished, he has no connection to it. But the fact that he comes back shows that it went so deep that even if he goes away, he comes back. And that's really what the Rambam means when he writes concerning about teshuvah, that not only is the sechar of a baal teshuvah very great, but as he writes in 讛诇讻讜转 转砖讜讘讛 驻专拽 讝壮, 讛诇讻讛 讚壮, that 诪注诇转谉 讙讚讜诇讛 诪诪注诇转 讗诇讜 砖诇讗 讞讟讗讜 诪注讜诇诐, their maalah, their madregah is greater than the madregah of those people who didn't sin at all. Because 诪驻谞讬 砖讗讬谉 讻讜讘砖讬谉 讬爪专诐 讬讜转专, because they overcome their yetzer hara even more. Which means that a person who 诇讗 讟注诐 讟注诐 讞讟讗, who didn't taste the taste of an aveirah, we're not so sure what madregah and how deep the tzidkut, the Torah u'mitzvot penetrated into him. We don't know if it penetrated into him to overcome all circumstances. It's possible that his completion in tzidkut is only because he was never tested with nisayonot. But if he would be tested, we are not sure that he would withstand the test. A baal teshuvah who tasted the taam of a 讞讟讗, 讜驻讬专砖 诪诪谞讜, as the Rambam says, and he stayed away from it, since he already went through that also, we are sure that even if that would happen again, then he would be able to withstand the yetzer hara, because he had it already and he went away from it. Which means in other words, that only in 注讘讜讚转 讛转砖讜讘讛 comes this expression of how 注讘讜讚转 讛砖诐 is carved out in the metziut of a Yid in such a way that you can't take it out, and therefore even after he does an aveirah, and he tears himself away from Hashem, he has no menuchah, he has no peace till he returns to Hashem and serving Hashem. And therefore, when is the complete 讙诪专 and 砖诇诪讜转 of 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, which means the Yom Tov that's connected to the gathering of the 转讘讜讗讛, which we said before means the time when the inyan of 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转, which is 转讘讜讗讛, is already gathered into person and he has it, only after Yom Kippur, which comes in connection to the giving of the second Luchos, which came as a result of the teshuvah. Which means that the simchah that you have on 讞讙 讛住讜讻讜转, which we said before is because of 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, is also connected to Yom Kippur, because as we explained, 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝 represents the Yom Tov when the Yid gathered 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转 already. When are we sure he gathered 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转 completely, that it penetrates into the whole metzius? Only if this includes the avodah of teshuvah. As long as his avodah does not include teshuvah, then we're not sure that he really gathered 转讜专讛 讜诪爪讜讜转, that it went in so deep into him. But if he already has teshuvah, then we know it went so deep that he can never get away from it, and even if he gets away, he'll come back. So the real simchah of 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝 of Sukkos is because it comes right after Yom Kippur, which is the day of the giving of the second Luchos, which came as a result of the Yidden doing teshuvah, so the simchah of 讞讙 讛住讜讻讜转 is because it comes after the inyan of teshuvah. So here we see the similarity between the simchah of 讞讙 讛住讜讻讜转 and the simchah of Simchas Torah. We said before the simchah of Simchas Torah is because of the Torah. Why Davka Simchas Torah? Why isn't it in Shavuos? So we said because Simchas Torah comes after Yom Kippur. Yom Kippur is a time when Hashem gave the second Luchot, and therefore the simchah of the giving of the second Luchot, which came after teshuvah, is a greater simchah, and therefore the simchah concerning Torah is on Simchat Torah, not on Shavuot. So we said that the simchah of Simchat Torah is because it comes after Yom Kippur, after the teshuvah. The simchah of Chag HaSukkot is for the same reason. It's the simchah in connection to 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝 because we gather the tevuah, which means in ruchniyut we gather Torah u'mitzvot, but the real simchah is because it comes after Yom Kippur, it comes after the avodah of teshuvah. And as we said in the beginning, that since means the simchah of Simchat Torah comes after the simchah of the seven days of Sukkot, and it's in connection to Shemini Atzeret, as the second day of Shemini Atzeret, which is the eighth day, that shows that this is a 讛诪砖讱, a continuation of the first seven days. And we asked, where is the similarity between the simchah of Simchat Torah to the simchah on this Yom Tov of Sukkot? But now we explained it. The simchah of Sukkot is also because it comes after Yom Kippur, that's when is the real 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝, and the simchah of Simchat Torah is also because it comes after Yom Kippur, which is the great simchah of Torah which comes after teshuvah. And this is one of the reasons why in the 拽专讬讗讛 of Simchat Torah we read the 驻住讜拽 转讜专讛 爪讜讛 诇谞讜 诪砖讛 诪讜专砖讛 拽讛诇转 讬注拽讘, which means the Torah that Moshe Rabbeinu commanded us is a yerushah, an inheritance to the community of Yaakov. We know that the inyan of yerushah is something that's beyond sechel. The inyan of inheritance is something that's beyond understanding, beyond avodah, beyond anything. A person who is just born, a child who is a 讘谉 讬讜诪讜, who is just born, inherits, if he is a 讬讜专砖, the same as an adult, because inyan of yerushah is connected to the mahut of the person, to the essence of this person because he is the 讬讜专砖, rather than to the actions of the person. And that's what the inyan of Simchat Torah is supposed to show, that this is the simchah that Torah uMitzvot became so close in the Yid, it became part of the essence of the Yid, not only superficially as it is concerning 讞讜讚砖 讛讗讘讬讘, and a little bit more as it is concerning 讞讙 讛拽爪讬专, but it's 讞讙 讛讗住讬祝 when you really gather it, and it becomes part of you. And that's why we read then the 驻住讜拽 that the Torah is 诪讜专砖讛 讝讜 讬专讜砖讛 to show that the Torah became one with the Yidden, in the essence of the Yidden, and therefore, that even if chas veshalom a Yid turns away from Torah uMitzvot, he still returns to Hashem because the Torah is part of him and he could never chas veshalom get away from it.