Zichronos book cover Zichronos is in print! Order your copy on Amazon
DAYS ON THE JEWISH CALENDAR: TAMMUZ

17 Tammuz: Part 3

Why the actual day of fasting can shift to Sunday, yet Shabbos itself remains the true eit ratzon of the fast.

Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Tammuz · 16:37

Works through the machloket between Rebbi and the Chachamim over whether a fast that falls on Shabbos is pushed off to Sunday or cancelled outright, then unpacks the halachic question of whether the fast's essential obligation still rests on Shabbos itself, with practical differences for a bris milah or a sick person. Concludes by comparing the hunger of Yom Kippur to the physical eating of Shabbos, showing both draw their chiyus from ruchniyus rather than gashmiyus.

Audio Transcript
Rebbi's View: If the Fast Falls on Shabbos, Skip It Entirely

Concerning a 拽讘讬注讜转 that 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝 can fall on 砖讘转, 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 comes out on 砖讘转, we find a 诪讞诇讜拽转 in the 讙诪专讗. It says in the 讙诪专讗 诪讙讬诇讛 讚祝 讛 注诪讜讚 讘 that 专讘讬 讘讬拽砖 诇注拽讜专 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, that 专讘讬 once wanted to nullify the whole 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, the whole fasting of 转砖注讛 讘讗讘. And the 讙诪专讗 explains that 诇讗 讻讱 讛讬讛 诪注砖讛, this was not the 诪注砖讛, 讗诇讗 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 砖讞诇 诇讛讬讜转 讘砖讘转 讛讜讛, it was 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 that came out on 砖讘转, 讜讚讞讜讛讜 诇讗讞专 讛砖讘转, and we pushed it away for after 砖讘转, that they should fast on Sunday, 讜讗诪专 专讘讬, so 专讘讬 said, 讛讜讗讬诇 讜谞讚讞讛 讬讚讞讛, since it was pushed away already, let it be pushed away completely, which means that 专讘讬 held that if 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 comes on a 砖讘转, then you don't have to fast at all. And it's self-understood that the same thing is also concerning 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝, that according to 专讘讬, if 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝 comes on a 砖讘转, you don't have to fast. And it's a 拽诇 讜讞讜诪专, because there is more reason to have to fast on 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 if it come on a 砖讘转, you should fast on Sunday, than you should have to fast on Sunday, the day after 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝, because concerning 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 there is a 住讘专讗 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 you should have to fast not on the ninth day of 讗讘, but on the 10th day of 讗讘. As the 讙诪专讗 says in 转注谞讬转 讚祝 讻讟 注诪讜讚 讗 that 专讘讬 讬讜讞谞谉 said, 讗诇诪诇讗 讛讬讬转讬 讘讗讜转讜 讛讚讜专, if I would have been in that generation, in the generation of the 讞讜专讘谉 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖, 诇讗 拽讘注转讬讜 讗诇讗 讘注砖讬专讬, I would have established the fast day for the 10th day of 讗讘, 诪驻谞讬 砖专讜讘讜 砖诇 讛讬讻诇 讘讜 谞砖专祝, because most of the 讛讬讻诇, most of the 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖 was burnt on the 10th day of 讗讘. So we see that when it comes to 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, there is a very strong 住讘专讗 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 you should have to fast on the 10th day of 讗讘. 诇驻讜注诇, the establishment of the 转注谞讬转 was on the ninth day of 讗讘, but still the 10th day of 讗讘 is very closely connected to the 讞讜专讘谉 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖. And still 专讘讬 said that if 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, the ninth day of 讗讘 came out on 砖讘转, he held that you should not fast on Sunday. Since it was pushed off, you can't fast on the day, you don't fast at all, even though it's the 10th day of 讗讘 which 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 has a very strong connection to the 讞讜专讘谉. Now certainly the same thing would be concerning 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝, that the 18th day of 转诪讜讝 has less connection to the 讞讜专讘谉 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖, has less connection to 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝 than the 10th day of 讗讘 to the ninth day of 讗讘. And if by the 10th day of 讗讘 he said that you don't fast at all, so too he held that you don't fast Sunday after 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝. But that was only the opinion of 专讘讬. The 讞讻诪讬诐 argue with 专讘讬, and they hold that we do fast on the day after 砖讘注讛 注砖专 讘转诪讜讝, and the day after 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, if they come on a 砖讘转. And the 讛诇讻讛 is like the 专讘谞谉, as we do, that we fast on Sunday, the 18th day of 转诪讜讝, and we fast on Sunday, the 10th day of 讗讘.

Does the Fast Obligation Stay on Shabbos or Shift to Sunday?

Now when a 转注谞讬转 comes on a 砖讘转, and we push it off for Sunday, there's a whole discussion in the 讗讞专讜谞讬诐 讘谞讜讙注 诇讛诇讻讛. In the 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 讗讘谞讬 谞讝专 讗讜专讞 讞讬讬诐 住讬诪谉 转拽讜, 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 讻转讘 住讜驻专 讗讜专讞 讞讬讬诐 住讬诪谉 拽讗, in the 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 of the 诪讛专砖状诐 讞诇拽 讙 住讬诪谉 砖住状讙, and the 专讗讙讗讟砖讗讜讜注专 speaks about it a lot in the 爪驻谞转 驻注谞讞 讛驻诇讗讛 and the 讛砖诪讟讜转 in the 诪讛讚讜专讗 转谞讬谞讗 and in 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 讚讜讜讬谞住拽, 砖讗诇讜转 讜转砖讜讘讜转 讜讜讗专砖讗, many places he speaks about this 注谞讬谉. What is the 注谞讬谉? That when a 转注谞讬转 comes out on 砖讘转, and we push it off for Sunday, the 砖讗诇讛 is, is the 驻砖讟 that the 讞讬讜讘 of the fast is 讘讗诪转 on 砖讘转, but since we can't fast on 砖讘转, we push it off to Sunday, so Sunday is considered a 转砖诇讜诪讬谉 of the 砖讘转? It completes what we were supposed to do on 砖讘转. So really what remains is that the day of the fast still remains 砖讘转, but 诇驻讜注诇 we can't fast on 砖讘转, so we're 诪砖诇讬诐, we complete it on Sunday. Or the 驻砖讟 is that 诇讻转讞讬诇讛, when the 讞讻诪讬诐 established the fast day, 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 they established it that if it comes on a 砖讘转, then the day of the fast day 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 is on Sunday, not on 砖讘转. And they write many differences 诇讛诇讻讛, 诇讚讬谞讗. For instance, if a child becomes 讘专 诪爪讜讛 on the 10th day of 讗讘, so if the day of the fast at that year is on the 10th day of 讗讘 诇讻转讞讬诇讛, then this child, since on the 10th day of 讗讘 he is 讘专 诪爪讜讛 already, he has an obligation to fast. But if we say that the fast day really remains for 砖讘转, Sunday just completes what he missed on 砖讘转, so the 讞讬讜讘 really is on 砖讘转, since on 砖讘转 he wasn't 讘专 诪爪讜讛 yet, so he didn't have the obligation of fasting, so therefore he doesn't have to fast on Sunday, because Sunday is only to be 诪砖诇讬诐 what you missed out on 砖讘转. Since on 砖讘转 he didn't miss anything because he wasn't 讘专 诪爪讜讛 yet, so he doesn't have to fast on Sunday. Another 谞驻拽讗 诪讬谞讛: there's a special 讚讬谉 in 砖讘讜注 砖讞诇 讘讜 转砖注讛 讘讗讘. The week of 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 has a special 讞讜诪专讗, special 讚讬谞讬诐. Now, if 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 is 砖讘转, then the whole week before that 砖讘转 is called the week of 转砖注讛 讘讗讘. But if 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 the 转拽谞讛 was that you fast on Sunday, then the week before cannot be considered the week of 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, because Sunday is a new week already, and 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 the 转拽谞讛 was for that day. Then there's another 谞驻拽讗 诪讬谞讛: whether on 砖讘转 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, the 讚讘专讬诐 砖讘爪谞注讗 谞讜讛讙, things which are private, whether the 讗讘讬诇讜转 of 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 concerning private things apply to that 砖讘转. So if you hold that 砖讘转 remains the day of the fast day, it's just that we can't fast, so we're 诪砖诇讬诐 it on Sunday, so then the 讚讘专讬诐 砖讘爪谞注讗, the private, hidden things apply for 砖讘转. But if we're going to say 诇讻转讞讬诇讛 the fast day was established in such a 拽讘讬注讜转 for Sunday, then 砖讘转 is not 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, it doesn't have the 讚讬谞讬诐 of 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, and and therefore the 讚讬谞讬诐 of 讚讘专讬诐 砖讘爪谞注讗, the private things would not apply. It would not it would not be 讗住讜专 to do the things that you are not allowed to do on 砖讘转 of 讗讘讬诇讜转.

Practical Halachic Differences: A Bris Milah and a Sick Person's Leniency

诇驻讜注诇 we do see, as many 讗讞专讜谞讬诐 bring out, that we do look at 砖讘转 as the day of the fast day, and Sunday as the day of 转砖诇讜诪讬谉. Because we find that if 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 comes out on 砖讘转 and we push it off to Sunday, then there are certain 拽讜诇讜转. We're more lenient with the fast day than if it would come out on 砖讘转. For instance, there's a 讚讬谉 concerning 讘专讬转 诪讬诇讛, that if the fast day is on 砖讘转, then the 讘注诇 讛讘专讬转, the father of the child, the 住谞讚拽, etc., have to fast on the day of the 讘专讬转. But if it come out on 砖讘转 and it's pushed off for Sunday, and Sunday is the 讘专讬转, the 讘注诇 讛讘专讬转 does not have to finish his 转注谞讬转, because it's his 讬讜诐 讟讜讘. And the 专讘讬 注拽讬讘讗 讗讬讙专 in the 讛讙讛讜转 in 砖讜诇讞谉 注专讜讱 brings from the 转砖讜讘讜转 of 砖讘讜转 讬注拽讘 that if a person is sick or a 诪注讜讘专转, a woman who is pregnant, and have a small 诪讬讞讜砖, they're allowed to eat on 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 that come on 砖讘转, which means to eat on the Sunday. But if it would come out on the day of the fast day 诇讻转讞讬诇讛, you are not allowed to do. And then we find in the 砖讚讬 讞诪讚 in 驻讗转 讛砖讚讛 in 讗住讬驻转 讚讬谞讬诐 诪注专讻转 讘讬谉 讛诪爪专讬诐, he brings different 讚讬谞讬诐, different 拽讜诇讜转 concerning 转砖注讛 讘讗讘 that comes out on 砖讘转 and we push it off for Sunday. So from all that it seems that 讘讗诪转 the day of the fast still remains for 砖讘转. But since we can't fast on 砖讘转, we push it off for Sunday. So Sunday is only a 转砖诇讜诪讬谉 for the fast day of 砖讘转. In which way does it express itself that 砖讘转 still remains the day of the 转注谞讬转? Because after all, 诇驻讜注诇 we don't fast on that day. So what is the 驻砖讟 that 砖讘转 still remains the day of the 转注谞讬转, it's just that it's pushed off for Sunday?

The Fast Day as an Eit Ratzon That Outlasts the Actual Fasting

Is the 驻砖讟 as follows: it says in 讗讞专讜谞讬诐 that on a fast day there are two 注谞讬谞讬诐. First, the day itself is considered a 讬讜诐 转注谞讬转, a day of a fast day. Then there's a second thing, that the person, the 讗讬讚, has to do certain things on that day, or there are certain restrictions on the person on that day. So when we say that we push away the 转注谞讬转 through 砖讘转 to Sunday, we only push it away 诇讙讘讬 the second thing, which means the 讚讬谞讬诐 on the person that he has to do or not do on a fast day, that falls on him only on Sunday. But the fact that the day remains a 讬讜诐 转注谞讬转, that's still for 砖讘转. What is the 驻砖讟 that the 砖讘转 is a 讬讜诐 转注谞讬转? Now we know that a fast day is a 讬讜诐 专爪讜谉 诇讛砖诐. It's a special day of willing, 讛砖诐's 专爪讜谉 is there, as the 驻住讜拽 says in 讬砖注讬讛 拽讗驻讬讟注诇 谞状讞 驻住讜拽 讛壮. And even though this is really written concerning a fast day 诇讙讘讬 转砖讜讘讛, when a person fasts as a form of 转砖讜讘讛 and 讻驻专讛, but these four fast days, and especially 转砖注讛 讘讗讘, is not 诇讻讗讜专讛 because of 转砖讜讘讛, but it's because of 讗讘讬诇讜转, as it says in 讝讻专讬讛 拽讗驻讬讟注诇 讝壮 驻住讜拽 讙壮. It's because of the 爪专讜转 that happened in these times. But nevertheless, the 专诪讘状诐 writes in 讛诇讻讜转 转注谞讬讜转 in the beginning of 驻专拽 讛壮 that even these fast days is 讻讚讬 诇注讜专专 讛诇讘讘讜转, in order to awaken the hearts, 诇驻转讜讞 讚专讻讬 转砖讜讘讛, to open the ways of 转砖讜讘讛, 讜讬讛讬讛 讝讛 讝讻专讜谉 诇诪注砖讬谞讜 讛专注讬诐, this should be a remembrance for our bad actions, 讜诪注砖讛 讗讘讜转讬谞讜 砖讛讬讛 讻诪注砖讬谞讜 注转讛, and the actions of our parents that were like our actions now, 注讚 砖讙专诐 诇讛诐 讜诇谞讜 讗讜转谉 讛爪专讜转, and this brought them and us these 爪专讜转, 砖讘讝讻专讜谉 讚讘专讬诐 讗诇讜 谞砖讜讘 诇讛讬讟讬讘, because we'll remember this, we'll return and mend our ways, and he quotes the 驻住讜拽 讜讛转讜讚讜 讗转 注讜谞诐 讜讗转 注讜谉 讗讘讜转诐. So we see that even these fast days also have the 注谞讬谉 of 转砖讜讘讛. 讜诪诪讬诇讗, when it says 诇讙讘讬 a 转注谞讬转 of 转砖讜讘讛 that it's a 讬讜诐 专爪讜谉 诇讛砖诐, the day of a fast day is a special, is 讝诪谉 住讙讜诇讛, 注转 专爪讜谉 to 讛砖诐, refers to these fast days also. And that is actually the reason why we fast on these days, because these days are special 讬诪讬 住讙讜诇讛. And as it says in the 讙诪专讗 in 讘专讻讜转 讚祝 讬状讝 注诪讜讚 讗壮: 砖讬讛讗 讞诇讘讬 讜讚诪讬 砖谞转诪注讟 讻讗讬诇讜 讛拽专讘转讬 诇驻谞讬讱 注诇 讙讘讬 讛诪讝讘讞 讜转专爪谞讬, that when you fast, it's when you it's as if the 讞诇讘 讜讚诐, the fat and the blood of the person that was minimized through not eating, should be as if he was 诪拽专讬讘 it as a 拽专讘谉 on the 诪讝讘讞, 讜转专爪谞讬, which means this becomes a 注转 专爪讜谉. So we see that these fast days are 注转 专爪讜谉. And that's what we're saying here: that even though the actual fasting takes place on Sunday, but 砖讘转 still remains the 注转 专爪讜谉 of the fast day. And 讗讚专讘讛, on 砖讘转 it's a stronger 注转 专爪讜谉, because 砖讘转 is a 讬讜诐, an 注转 专爪讜谉 by itself, even without the fast day. It's 讞诪讚转 讬诪讬诐 讗讜转讜 拽专讗转, it's a special day of pleasure. So if the fast day comes on 砖讘转, so we're saying that it remains that this is the fast day, even though 诇驻讜注诇 诇讙讘讬 what the person is supposed to do, so we say he's not allowed to fast on 砖讘转. But 诇讙讘讬 the day itself, we say the 注转 专爪讜谉 of the fast day is on 砖讘转 itself. And the truth is that there's a very strong similarity between what the 注转 专爪讜谉 of 砖讘转 is 诇讙讘讬 the 注转 专爪讜谉 of a 转注谞讬转. Because it says in many 住驻专讬诐 concerning 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专, the fast day of 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专, and from there we learn out that the same thing applies to all 转注谞讬转讬诐, is that that's the day when 诇讞讬讜转诐 讘专注讘, as the 驻住讜拽 says in 转讛诇讬诐, 拽驻讬讟诇 诇讙 驻住讜拽 讬讟, which means that on 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专, the 讞讬讜转 that you get, the life that you get, is from the hunger, from not eating. All year round, the way a person lives is from 讗讻讬诇讛 讜砖转讬讬讛, you have to eat and drink physical food, and that's the way you live. Your 讙讜祝 lives from 讙砖诪讬讜转讚讬拽注 food. On 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专, the level a 讬讬讚 is supposed to reach is that his 讞讬讜转, his life is supposed to come from not eating, which means that's the day he gets life in a higher level. Just like 诇注转讬讚 诇讘讜讗, 讗讬谉 讘讜 诇讗 讗讻讬诇讛 讜诇讗 砖转讬讬讛, there is no eating and no drinking, and then there will be a life in a higher 诪讚专讙讛, the life will come from 专讜讞谞讬讜转 rather than from 讙砖诪讬讜转. On 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专 a 讬讬讚 is supposed to reach that 诪讚专讙讛, 诇讞讬讜转诐 讘专注讘, that his life comes from 专讜讞谞讬讜转, not from 讙砖诪讬讜转. As we see 讘驻讜注诇, on that day a 讬讬讚 does not eat and drink. A 讬讬讚 is involved in 注谞讬讬谞讬 拽讚讜砖讛, you stand in 砖讜诇 and you 讚讗讜讜注谉 and you learn all day. So a 讬讬讚 is involved in 专讜讞谞讬讜转, and that's how he lives. What 诇驻讜注诇 讟讗拽注 brings the life to the 讬讬讚 on that day? From the food that he ate before. The food that he ate before is not food anymore. What he ate the day before became part of him. Who is he? He is a 讬讬讚. So the food became part of him as a 讬讬讚, and that's the life he gets that day. So the life a 讬讬讚 gets on 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专 is not from physical food, but from food that already turned into 拽讚讜砖讛, turned into being part of the person, part of the 讬讬讚. So on 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专 a 讬讬讚 reaches the 诪讚专讙讛 that his 讞讬讜转 comes from 专讜讞谞讬讜转, not from 讙砖诪讬讜转.

Living From Ruchniyus, Not Gashmiyus: Yom Kippur's Hunger and Shabbos's Pleasure

Now concerning 砖讘转, even though on 砖讘转 a 讬讬讚 does eat and drink, but the eating and drinking of 砖讘转 is not the same as eating and drinking of the weekday. Because during the week, normally, when a person eats and drinks, his pleasure comes from the food itself. His pleasure comes from the 讙砖诪讬讜转讚讬拽注 food and the 讙砖诪讬讜转讚讬拽注 drink. So his pleasure is a secular pleasure, so to speak. On 砖讘转, when there's a 诪爪讜讛 诇注谞讙讜, there's a 诪爪讜讛 to have pleasure from the food and from the drink, so the food that he eats and the pleasure he has from the food is really 拽讚讜砖讛, is really holiness, really a 诪爪讜讛. So it comes out that the 砖诇讬诪讜转, when is the 拽讬讜诐 of the 诪爪讜讛 of 注讜谞讙 砖讘转 complete, when his pleasure is from not the food, but from the fact he is 诪拽讬讬诐 the 诪爪讜讛 of 讛壮 through this food that he's eating. So it comes out that the pleasure on 砖讘转 is not a pleasure of the 讙讜祝, but it's a pleasure of the 谞砖诪讛. Now the truth is not everybody feels it, but the 讛诇讻讛, the 讚讬谉 is that that's how it should be. So therefore in essence this is the way it is by everybody, even if a person doesn't feel it, that the pleasure he has on 砖讘转 from the food and the drink is not from them as 讙砖诪讬讜转, but it is because it's a 诪爪讜讛 to eat and drink on 砖讘转. So it comes out that on 砖讘转 a 讬讬讚 has the 讻讞 to reach the 诪讚专讙讛 of 诇讞讬讜转诐 讘专注讘, which means to get 讞讬讜转 from 专讜讞谞讬讜转 rather than from 讙砖诪讬讜转, 讞讬讜转 of the 谞砖诪讛 rather than 讞讬讜转 of the 讙讜祝, through eating and drinking. The same level a 讬讬讚 reaches on 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专 through not eating and drinking, a 讬讬讚 is able to reach on 砖讘转 through yes eating and drinking. Because as we said, the 砖诇讬诪讜转 of the 诪爪讜讛 of 注讜谞讙 砖讘转 is when his pleasure is not from the 转注谞讜讙, from the pleasure of the food, but it is an 注讜谞讙 专讜讞谞讬 of the 谞砖诪讛, it's a 专讜讞谞讬讜转讚讬拽注 pleasure of the 谞砖诪讛, because he is 诪拽讬讬诐 the 诪爪讜讛 of 注讜谞讙 砖讘转. So it comes out that this is similar to 诇讞讬讜转诐 讘专注讘. Because the 讗诪转 is, 诇讙讘讬 the body, if a person doesn't have pleasure from the food itself, it is called hunger. Just like we find concerning the 诪谉, that the 驻住讜拽 says in 注拽讘, 拽驻讬讟诇 讞 驻住讜拽 讙: 讜讬注谞讱 讜讬专注讬讘讱 讜讬讗讻讬诇讱 讗转 讛诪谉. He made you suffer, He made you hungry, and He gave you the 诪谉. Now 诇讻讗讜专讛, if He gave them the 诪谉, He didn't make them hungry. And the answer is, because when they ate the 诪谉, first of all, they didn't see the taste that they had, but there's another reason: since the 诪谉 was really a 专讜讞谞讬讜转讚讬拽注 food, so 诇讙讘讬 the 讙讜祝 讙砖诪讬, 诇讙讘讬 the physical 讙讜祝, it's called that he was hungry, because when is the physical 讙讜祝 satisfied and not hungry? When it has pleasure from the 讙砖诪讬讜转 of it. Since the 讙讜祝 is a physical thing, so it has to have pleasure from the physical food, and then it's satisfied. But if the food that it eats is 专讜讞谞讬讜转讚讬拽注 food, and the pleasure is from the 专讜讞谞讬讜转 of it, then 诇讙讘讬 the 讙讜祝 it's called hunger. So when you eat on 砖讘转, 诇讙讘讬 the 讙讜祝, it's as if the 讙讜祝 is fasting, because the 讙讜祝 doesn't have pleasure from the food, because it's a 专讜讞谞讬讜转讚讬拽注 pleasure, it's pleasure from the 诪爪讜讛 of 注讜谞讙 砖讘转, so 诪诪讬诇讗 诇讙讘讬 the 讙讜祝 it's called that it's fasting. So it comes out that the eating on 砖讘转 is similar to 诇讞讬讜转诐 讘专注讘 of 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专. And since as we said before, this concept of 诇讞讬讜转诐 讘专注讘, even though it's written 诇讙讘讬 讬讜诐 讻讬驻讜专, but it applies to every 转注谞讬转, so every 转注谞讬转 the meaning of the fast day is that that day you have 讞讬讜转 from 专讜讞谞讬讜转, not from 讙砖诪讬讜转. Now since we said that 砖讘转 is the same 诪讚专讙讛 that you have 讞讬讜转 from 专讜讞谞讬讜转, not from 讙砖诪讬讜转, from the 谞砖诪讛, not from the 讙讜祝, so 诪诪讬诇讗 when a fast day comes out on 砖讘转, it still remains that 砖讘转 is actually the fast day. Even though 讘驻讜注诇 we fast on Sunday, but that's only 诇讙讘讬 the 讙讘专讗, the person has to do the 讛诇讻讜转 of a 转注谞讬转 on Sunday, but the day, the 注转 专爪讜谉 of what a fast day is, is still on 砖讘转. And the explanation as we just said, because on 砖讘转 you could have the fast day. Which means that just like on a fast day the main thing is that your 讞讬讜转 comes from 专讜讞谞讬讜转, not from 讙砖诪讬讜转, so on 砖讘转 that can happen too. And not 住转诐, but it happens on a higher 诪讚专讙讛, because on a fast day it only happens through not eating. On 砖讘转 it happens that even though you're eating and drinking, nevertheless, to you it is not physical food, but the eating and the drinking is only a fulfillment of the 诪爪讜讛 of 讛砖诐, and that's where the pleasure is. So really on that day, your 讞讬讜转 comes from 专讜讞谞讬讜转讚讬拽注 pleasure.

← PREVIOUS
17 Tammuz: Part 2
NEXT →
Month of Tammuz
NOW PLAYING Choose a shiur to begin Rabbi Yehuda Leib Schapiro
0:00
0:00