Chanukah: Part 8
Why Al Hanissim says the menorah was lit 'in Your holy courtyards' rather than in the Heichal where it actually stood
Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Kislev · 16:40
Untangling why the text of Al Hanissim places the lighting of the candles in the courtyards rather than the Heichal, weighing the Chasam Sofer's answer against its own difficulties, and arriving at a different peshat: candles lit throughout Yerushalayim as an expression of thanks -- one that, through the ruchniyus of light, commemorates the victory of the war itself, not only the miracle of the oil.
Audio Transcript
In the nusach of 注诇 讛谞住讬诐 that we say on Chanukah, after we finish talking about the miracles Hashem performed, then we say 讜讗讞专 讻讱 讘讗讜 讘谞讬讱 诇讚讘讬专 讘讬转讱, then your children came into your house, 讜驻讬谞讜 讗转 讛讬讻诇讱, and they emptied out your heichal, this is the 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖, 讜讟讬讛专讜 讗转 诪拽讚砖讱, and they purified, they were metaher your 诪拽讚砖, 讜讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, and they lit candles in your holy yards. So there is a great question asked on this nusach of 注诇 讛谞住讬诐: What do we mean 讜讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, that they lit the menorah in your holy yards? The place of the menorah is not in the chatzer of the Beis Hamikdash, in the yard of the Beis Hamikdash, but the place of the menorah is inside, in the heichal. So why do we say here that they lit the candles 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, in the chatzer of the Beis Hamikdash? So the Chasam Sofer in his derashos answers that this is based on the din of the Rambam. The Rambam paskens in 讛诇讻讜转 讘讬讗转 诪拽讚砖 驻专拽 讟' 讛诇讻讛 讝' that 讛讚诇拽转 讛谞专讜转 讻砖讬专讛 讘讝专, that to light the candles you don't need a kohen, even a zar, a non-kohen, to do it. 诇驻讬讻讱 讗诐 讛讬讟讬讘 讛讻讛谉 讗转 讛谞专讜转 讜讛讜爪讬讗谉 诇讞讜抓, therefore, if the kohen prepared the neirot, the candles, and he took it outside of the 讛讬讻诇, 诪讜转专 诇讝专 诇讛讚诇讬拽谉. So a non-kohen is allowed to light it. And since at that time the Yevanim made the 讛讬讻诇 讟诪讗, and as he says 讛讬讛 讛讛讬讻诇 诪诇讗 讙诇讜诇讬诐, the heichal, which is inside the building, was full of avodah zarah, so he says 注讚 砖驻讬谞讜 讗转 讛讬讻诇讱 讜讟讬讛专讜 讗转 诪拽讚砖讱, therefore, till they were able to empty out the heichal and be metaher, to cleanse the Beis Hamikdash, so he says 诇讗 讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘驻谞讬诐, therefore they didn't light the candles inside, 讗诇讗 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, but in the yard, baEzrah, in the Ezrah. Since the Rambam paskens that you're allowed to light the candles in the Ezrah, so therefore, at that time, when they had no choice, they lit the candles in the Ezrah. And he adds that that was the reason the nes became publicized to all the Yidden, because all the Yidden saw the menorah burning for eight days in the chatzer. Had it been in the Heichal, then only the Kohanim would see the miracle. But being that they lit the menorah in the chatzer at that time, so everybody was able to see the miracle. But lichorah, this answer needs a lot of explanation. Because from the lashon, the way we say in Al Hanissim, we say that 讘讗讜 讘谞讬讱 诇讚讘讬专 讘讬转讱 讜驻讬谞讜 讗转 讛讬讻诇讱 讜讟讬讛专讜 讗转 诪拽讚砖讱 讜讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱. So it seems as if the order was that first they emptied out the Heichal, then they purified the Mikdash, and then they lit the candles. So it comes out that they lit the candles after they already were metaher, they purified the Mikdash. And that's how the lashon also seems in the Megillat Antiochus. So how could the Chatam Sofer say that the reason that they lit the menorah outside was because the Heichal was still tamei? And it's also muchach, you can prove from many places, from the Mordechai and the Ohr Zarua in Hilchot Chanukah 住讬诪谉 转专讻\"讗, brought down in the Darkei Moshe to Tur Orach Chaim in the beginning of 住讬诪谉 转专\"注, and the Shibolei HaLeket 注谞讬谉 专讗砖 讞讜讚砖 住讬诪谉 拽注\"讚, and in many other places, that the name Chanukah is based on the word 讞谞讜讻转 讛诪讝讘讞 讜讛诪拽讚砖, that that's the time they dedicated the mizbeach and the Beit HaMikdash. Since the Yevanim, the Greeks, were mechallel the kedushah, desecrated the kedushah of the Beit HaMikdash, so afterwards they had to rededicate the Beit HaMikdash. And since Chanukah starts on 25 Kislev, on the 25th day of Kislev, so it comes out that the dedication of the Beit HaMikdash took place on the 25th day of Kislev. So therefore, it seems that on that day when they lit the menorah, which was on the 25th day of Kislev, the Mikdash and the mizbeach was already mechunach, was already dedicated. That means that it was already clean. So how could he say that the reason they lit it outside was because the Beit HaMikdash was still tamei? Another question: When we say that the 讛讬讻诇 was full of 讙诇讜诇讬诐, he says, full of avodah zarah, therefore they couldn't light the menorah in the 讛讬讻诇, why should we assume that only the 讛讬讻诇 was full of 讙诇讜诇讬诐? Why shouldn't we assume that all other parts of the Beit HaMikdash were also full of 讙诇讜诇讬诐, including the azarah? Because when we say in the nusach of Al HaNissim that they went in 讜讟讬讛专讜 讗转 诪拽讚砖讱, that they were metaher the Mikdash, it doesn't mention which part of the Mikdash they were metaher. It's mashma that they had to be metaher the whole Beit HaMikdash, which means the 讛讬讻诇 and the azarah and all other parts. So it comes out that they were all full of avodah zarah. So why should we think that they were metaher the azarah first, before they were metaher the 讛讬讻诇, and therefore, for all eight days, they weren't able to light the menorah in the 讛讬讻诇, and they had to light it in the azarah, because the azarah was clean and the 讛讬讻诇 was not clean? Bifshitut, it all became tamei. So why should we think that they were metaher the 讛讬讻诇 and the 注讝专讛 not? There could have been a sevara to say that the reason they lit the menorah in the chatzer was in order to publicize the miracle. And as the Chasam Sofer says that had it been in the 讛讬讻诇, then not everyone would see the miracle. That's why they put it in the chatzer. But it's very hard to say that l'chatchilah they put the menorah out into the chatzer because they wanted people to see it, especially if they weren't even sure there would be a miracle. They didn't know that miracle would happen. They saw the miracle after it happened. So the first day when they put the menorah out, they weren't sure a miracle is going to happen. So why should we say they put it out into the chatzer so people should see it? Another question: why do we say in the lashon of Al Hanissim that they lit the 诪谞讜专讛 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱? 讞爪专讜转 is lashon rabim, the holy yards, plural. The chatzer is only one, so should have said 讘讞爪专 拽讚砖讱, they lit the menorah in your holy chatzer, which is in the 注讝专讛. Especially that earlier before that in Al Hanissim, everything is said lashon yachid, in singular. It says 诇讚讘讬专 讘讬转讱, they came into the 讚讘讬专 讘讬转讱, which is 讬讞讬讚, 讜驻讬谞讜 讗转 讛讬讻诇讱, they emptied out your 讛讬讻诇, 诇砖讜谉 讬讞讬讚 singular, 讜讟讛专讜 讗转 诪拽讚砖讱, they were metaher your 诪拽讚砖, doesn't say your 诪拽讚砖讬诐, your 诪拽讚砖 which is lashon yachid. So why all of a sudden should it change here and say 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, which is lashon rabim?
Therefore, there's another peshat to learn in these words of Al Hanissim, that when it says 讜讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, that they lit candles in your holy yards, it doesn't mean the nerot of the menorah. It doesn't mean the candles of the menorah in the 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖, but it means other candles. Candles that they lit at that time as a praise and a hilul v'hodaah to Hashem. As we find in many places that one of the ways to express a person's thanking Hashem is through lighting candles. As we see in the Gemara Sanhedrin 讚祝 诇状讘 注诪讜讚 讘壮 in Tosafos 讚讬讘讜专 讛诪转讞讬诇 拽讜诇, and Rashi in 讬专诪讬讛 拽驻讬讟诇 讻状讛 驻住讜拽 讬壮 explains it, and as it says in a 驻住讜拽 in 讬砖注讬讛 拽驻讬讟诇 讻状讚 驻住讜拽 讟状讜 the way it's explained in Targum and in Rashi, the 驻住讜拽 says 讘讗讜专讬诐 讻讘讚讜 讛砖诐. With fire, with candles you should be mechabed, you should honor Hashem. And it also is brought down lehalachah in the Tur and in Shulchan Aruch in Orach Chaim 住讬诪谉 转专状讬. It says legabei the dinim of 谞专讜转 讘讬转 讛讻谞住转, 诇讙讘讬 lighting candles in shul, that this is an expression of praise to Hashem. We also find in the Beit HaMikdash itself that on Simchat Beit HaShoevah, during the week of Sukkot, when they used to pour the water, the 谞讬住讜讱 讛诪讬诐, and they used to have a special simchah at that time, the greatest simchah of the year, as the Gemara says, 诪讬 砖诇讗 专讗讛 砖诪讞转 讘讬转 讛砖讜讗讘讛 诇讗 专讗讛 砖诪讞讛 诪讬诪讬讜, anybody who did not see the simchah at the time of Simchat Beit HaShoevah never saw simchah. So the Gemara says in 住讜讻讛 讚祝 谞状讗 注诪讜讚 讗壮 that one of the things they did then as an expression of simchah, and it was 砖诪讞讛 砖诇 诪爪讜讛, a simchah of the mitzvah which is in connection to Hashem, a simchah in the mitzvot of Hashem, and a simchah in connection to praising Hashem, so it says that they lit 诪谞讜专讜转 砖诇 讝讛讘, golden menorot in the Ezrat Nashim. And it says that it was so light that it made the whole Yerushalayim light up. And this was because of the great simchah. So we see from all these places that one of the ways of expressing thanks to Hashem is through lighting candles. And this is the meaning of 讜讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, that they lit nerot in your holy yards. This is not part of what it says before that they came into 讚讘讬专 讘讬转讱 and they emptied 讛讬讻诇讱 and they were 诪讟讛专 诪拽讚砖讱 and then they did the avodah by lighting the nerot. This is a new thing. This is part of the expression of the thanks to Hashem. Just like it says afterwards, 诇讛讜讚讜转 讜诇讛诇诇 诇砖诪讱 讛讙讚讜诇, to praise and to thank your holy Name. So this is part of it, that after they cleaned out the Mikdash, what did they do? They thanked Hashem. How did they thank Hashem? 讜讛讚诇讬拽讜 谞专讜转 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱. They lit a lot of candles in the holy yards, and also they were kove'a it says further, 拽讘注讜 砖诪讜谞转 讬诪讬 讞谞讜讻讛 讗诇讜, they established these eight days of Chanukah in order 诇讛讜讚讜转 讜诇讛诇诇 诇砖诪讱 讛讙讚讜诇, to thank and praise your holy Name. So lighting the candles is part of the praise that they did at that time. And this is the reason why it says 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, 诇砖讜谉 专讘讬诐, it says plural, your holy yards. It doesn't say 讘讞爪专 拽讚砖讱, because if we would learn the pshat that it means the Azarah, then it should have said 讘讞爪专 拽讚砖讱. But now that we're learning that it means they lit a lot of candles all over, so they didn't only light it in the Azarah, they also lit it in the Ezrat Nashim and around the Beit HaMikdash, all over they lit it, in the whole of Yerushalayim. And we takeh find that sometimes the expression 讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱 refers to the whole city of Yerushalayim, because there's a pasuk that says in 讬砖注讬讛 拽驻讬讟诇 住状讘 驻住讜拽 讟壮 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讬, and the mefarshim there explain that 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讬 means the whole city of Yerushalayim. And the truth is that the Avudraham concerning Chanukah, in connection to this lashon in 注诇 讛谞讬住讬诐, 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱, quotes this pasuk. He learns a different pshat, but we do see he quotes this 驻住讜拽, 讜讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讬, concerning these words, 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱. So just like the 讜讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讬 in Yeshayah means the whole city of Yerushalayim, so here too, 讘讞爪专讜转 拽讚砖讱 refers to the whole city of Yerushalayim. To the Azarah, which was the Ezrat Kohanim, the 注讝专转 讬砖专讗诇, the 注讝专转 谞砖讬诐, around the 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖, the whole city of Yerushalayim they lit candles, because this was the way they expressed their thanks to Hashem.
But a question that comes up, if so, why mention out of all forms of praise to Hashem davka the inyan of lighting candles? Why doesn't it say that they davend to Hashem, they said Hallel, many other things that they did to praise Hashem, to thank Hashem? Why does it mention davka the inyan of lighting candles? If we would learn the pashuter pshat that it means that they lit the menorot, so we understand this is a remez, a hint to the nes, the miracle that took place with the menorah, that it lasted for eight days. But if we're learning this is just a form of praise to Hashem, so why mention davka the praising Hashem through candles and not any other form of praise? And the answer is, because this brings out the whole idea of what happened at that time. As it says at the beginning of Al Hanissim, what did the Yevanim want? They wanted 诇讛砖讻讬讞诐 转讜专转讱, to make you forget their your 转讜专讛, 讜诇讛注讘讬专诐 诪讞讜拽讬 专爪讜谞讱, to make him go away from the chukim of your will. And as we explained last year, that the Yevanim did not care that the Yidden learn Torah. The Yevanim the Yevanim were smart people themselves, cultured people, and they appreciated knowledge and wisdom and intellect. What they cared about was, why the Yidden learn Torah with the kedushah, with the ruchniyut of the Torah, 转讜专转讱. So they wanted to make the Yidden forget that it's 转讜专转讱, that it's your Torah. Learn Torah because it's a nice chochmah, but don't learn Torah because it's the Torah of Hashem. And the same thing with the mitzvot. They didn't mind that the Yidden would do mitzvot, but why do mitzvot just because Hashem said so? Why do chukim? They didn't mind if the Yidden did mishpatim, mitzvot which have a reason, and if not for the Torah, we would do them anyway, or the mitzvot which are called edot, which we wouldn't have done it if not for the Torah, but after the Torah commanded us, we understand why we do it. That, they didn't mind. What they cared about was chukim, those mitzvot that have no reason. That's what they didn't want we should do. And even that, the main stress is 讞讜拽讬 专爪讜谞讱. Why do it just because it's the will of Hashem? At least do it because you understand in your sechel that there must be a good reason. But to do it just because Hashem wants, that they didn't want. The ruchniyut of Torah and the ruchniyut of mitzvot, that's what they fought. That's what they didn't want. And therefore, when the Yidden overpowered them and came out victorious, they celebrated through lighting candles, because the inyan of light, the inyan of candles represents ruchniyut. Because we know the pasuk says, 讻讬 谞专 诪爪讜讛 讜转讜专讛 讗讜专. A mitzvah is like a candle, and the Torah is like light. Why compare a mitzvah to a candle and Torah to light? Because bichlal, light represents ruchniyut. Light, within this physical world, is an object which is not tangible. So even though it is definitely a physical thing, but within this physical world, the light is not a tangible thing. And therefore, many times when we want to express ruchniyut, we express it through the word or, or through the concept of light. And therefore, the Yidden wanted to show Hashem that they appreciate the miracle that happened, and what they cared about was not the physical miracle, that their physical body was saved, but what they really appreciated was, and what they cared about, was that in ruchniyut they were saved. That this that the Yevanim wanted 诇讛砖讻讬讞诐 转讜专转讱 讜诇讛注讘讬专诐 诪讞讜拽讬 专爪讜谞讱, they overcame that, and now they're able to serve Hashem with pure ruchniyut. Serve Hashem not because their physical body or their physical mind wanted to do it, or understood to do it, but just because Hashem wants them to do it. And therefore they, who are Yidden, 诪爪讚 讛谞砖诪讛 have to do it. And the way they expressed it was by lighting a lot of candles, to show Hashem that we understand that this was a ruchniyusdike nitzachon, a ruchniyusdike victory, and therefore we express it in a ruchniyusdike way.
This also explains why the main mitzvah of Chanukah is to light the candles. Even though, as we know, that there are two things that happened at the time of Chanukah: the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛, the victory of the war, and also the nes of the candles. So why is it that the main mitzvah of Chanukah is the mitzvah of lighting the candles, which represents the nes of the 驻讱 讛砖诪谉, of the oil that lasted for eight days, and we don't do anything that would remind us of the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛? And the answer is, because lighting the candles also reminds us of the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛. If the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛, the victory of the war, would be completely physical, then by lighting candles, we would not express the victory of the war, because lighting candles is one thing, and the victory of the war was another thing. But being that we explained that the victory of the war itself was a spiritual thing Because the main reason for the war was because the 讬讜讜谞讬诐 wanted 诇讛砖讻讬讞诐 转讜专转讱 讜诇讛注讘讬专诐 诪讞讜拽讬 专爪讜谞讱, as the Levush explains, that that's the difference between Chanukah and Purim. The time of Purim, that's when Haman wanted 诇讛砖诪讬讚 诇讛专讜讙 讜诇讗讘讚 讗转 讻诇 讛讬讛讜讚讬诐. He wanted to destroy all the Yidden, so he was against the gufos, the bodies of the Yidden. He wanted to destroy the guf of the Yidden, the gashmiyus of the Yidden. But in Chanukah, the main thing was a 诪诇讞诪讛 专讜讞谞讬转, a spiritual war. What they wanted was, as we said before, 诇讛砖讻讬讞诐 转讜专转讱 讜诇讛注讘讬专诐 诪讞讜拽讬 专爪讜谞讱. And the way to express ruchniyus, as we said before, is through lighting candles. So therefore, when we light the menorah, this doesn't only express the thanks for the miracle with the 驻讱 讛砖诪谉, with the oil that lasted for eight days, but this also expresses the thanks to Hashem for the miracle of the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛, of the victory of the war. Because the victory of the war was a ruchniyus'dike victory, and the way to express ruchniyus, spirituality, is through candles. And therefore, by lighting the Chanukah menorah, we express our thanks to Hashem even for the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛. And as we see that when we light the candles and we say 讛谞专讜转 讛诇诇讜, in 讛谞专讜转 讛诇诇讜 we mention that we light the candles 注诇 讛转砖讜注讜转 讜注诇 讛谞讬住讬诐 讜注诇 讛谞驻诇讗讜转, for your help, for your nisim, and for your wonders. And as we explained in the earlier shiur, this refers to the miracles that took place at the time of the war. And at the end we also mention 诇讛讜讚讜转 讜诇讛诇诇 诇砖诪讱 讛讙讚讜诇 注诇 谞讬住讬讱 讜注诇 谞驻诇讗讜转讬讱 讜注诇 讬砖讜注讜转讬讱. So we do mention the miracles of the winning of the war at the time when we light the candles, because as we said, the lighting of the candles also expresses our thanks for the 谞爪讞讜谉 讛诪诇讞诪讛, for the victory at the time of the war.