Parshas Beshalach
The splitting of every drop of water in the world at Yam Suf, not just the sea itself, turns out to be about preserving mankind's freedom to choose belief over denial.
Part of Shemot
Explores the Mechilta's teaching that not only the Yam Suf split at the Exodus, but every gathering of water in the world split as well โ pits, jugs, and cups included. Traces the explanation that this was so the miracle would leave room for free choice, tying it to the Midrash on Moshe Rabbeinu's hesitation to write โlet us make manโ and the answer that whoever wants to err is free to err.
Audio Transcript
A vort from the Rebbe on this week's parashah, Parashat Beshalach. The main theme of Parashat Beshalach is obviously ืงืจืืขืช ืื ืกืืฃ. And the pasuk refers to ืงืจืืขืช ืื ืกืืฃ with the words, \"ืืืฉื ืืช ืืื ืืืจืื,\" the Oibershter made the yam, the sea, dry, \"ืืืืงืขื ืืืื,\" and the waters split. Pashut pshat in pasuk is that the waters of the Yam Suf split so the Yidden would be able to cross. But the Mekhilta, which is like a Midrash written by the Tannaim, says like this, \"ืืืืงืขื ืืืื,\" the water split, \"ืื ืืืื ืฉืืขืืื ื ืืงืขื,\" all waters in the world split, \"ืืฃ ืืืื ืฉืืืืจืืช, ืฉืืฉืืืื, ืฉืืืขืจืืช,\" that even the water in the pits, in the caves, \"ืืฉืืื, ืืฉืืืืก, ืืฉืืฆืืืืืช, ืืฉืืืืืืช,\" and in the jug, in the cup, in the bottles, all the water split, \"ืื ืืืื ืฉืืขืืื,\" all the waters in the world split. And the question is obvious. If the whole purpose of splitting the water so the Yidden should be able to cross the Yam Suf, why did He make all waters in the world split, that wherever there was a cup of water or a jug of water or something, wherever there was a gathering of water, it all split? What was the purpose for it?
And the Rebbe explains that the purpose was so there should be free choice. If the water of the Yam Suf only would split, it would be obvious that it's for the sake of the Yidden, and it's obvious that the Oibershter takes care of the Yidden, and He does it for them, and the Oibershter loves the Yidden, etc., etc. So there's no ืืืืจื ืืืคืฉืืช, there's no free choice, no one could deny it. The Oibershter wants that people should accept the truth and do the truth and accept the truth out of their own choice. Their avodah should be put in, they should choose it. So, had only the water of Yam Suf split, there would be no choice but to say that the Oibershter made this miracle, and you have to believe in the Oibershter. So the Oibershter made that all waters in the world split, so someone could use it and say, \"Well, obviously it has nothing to do with the Yidden.\" So there's a choice to say this doesn't mean that the Oibershter did it. And that's what the Oibershter wants. There should be free choice, we call it ืืืืจื ืืืคืฉืืช, free choice, a person has a choice to believe it or not believe in the truth. So the Oibershter made that it should be a a a possibility for that to happen.
And this is based on a Midrash, where the Midrash says that when the Oibershter dictated the Torah, because we know ืชืืจื ืฉืืืชื, the Oybershter dictated word for word to Moshe Rabbeinu, and when it came to the words in ืคืจืฉืช ืืจืืฉืืช, where the Oybershter said to Moshe, \"Write the words, 'ื ืขืฉื ืืื ืืฆืืื ื ืืืืืชื ื,'\" let us make a man in our image. Us, let us make, ืืฉืื ืจืืื, plural. There's only one Oybershter, should have said, \"ืืขืฉื ืืื,\" I will make. What does it mean, \"let us make\"? So Moshe Rabbeinu, when he was going to write these words, he said to the Oybershter, \"ืื ืืชื ื ืืชื ืคืชืืื ืคื ืืืื ืื?\" Why are you telling me to write, why are you putting into the Torah these words, the word \"ื ืขืฉื ืืื,\" let us make? By doing that, you are giving a place for the apikorsim, for the non-believers. They will say, \"You see, the Torah itself says that there's more than one creator.\" So the Oybershter answered him, \"ืืชืื, ืืืจืืฆื ืืืขืืช ืืืขื.\" You write it, and whoever wants to make a mistake, let he'll make a mistake. What is the meaning behind it? The meaning behind it is the Oybershter said, \"I want there should be a place for a person to make a mistake and to learn the wrong thing. Then there's free choice. Should he take the right way or the wrong way? And hopefully he will take the right way. But the Oybershter makes everything that there should be free choice.\" But there's another nekudah here, that when the Oybershter made it so under free choice, the Oybershter also in these words, the way the Midrash says it, hinted something, that who is going to choose the wrong way? Somebody who is inclined for that. That's why the Oybershter said, \"ืืชืื, ืืืจืืฆื ืืืขืืช ืืืขื.\" You write, and whoever wants to make a mistake could make a mistake. What do you mean whoever wants to make a mistake? Should have said, \"And whoever makes a mistake will make a mistake. That's going to be his problem.\" The Oybershter, ืืจืืฆื ืืืขืืช, is to tell us that really, if a person is not inclined to go against, just thinks, if he thinks straight, he will come to a conclusion of the right thing. Nevertheless, the Oybershter left it that it's a possibility to make a mistake. But who's going to do that? Only somebody who's looking for that. And that's what we see by a lot of people that they, what they do is they don't keep Torah uMitzvot, etc., etc. And then their excuse is, \"We don't believe in it,\" etc. It's only an excuse. They're looking for an excuse not to do it, so they say we don't believe in it. But really, if they would think straight, they themselves would believe in it. That's what He said here, ein hachi nami, I made, the Oybershter is saying, \"I made ืืืืจื ืืืคืฉืืช, there's free choice, but nevertheless, you have to also know that ืืจืืฆื ืืืขืืช, if you make that mistake, it's because you're looking for that. But otherwise, a person will come to the real conclusion. But nevertheless, the Oybershter makes it so that there should be a possibility for a person to make a mistake.\"