Zichronos book cover Zichronos is in print! Order your copy on Amazon
SHEMOT

Rabbi Schapiro on the Parshah: Yitro

Why Was It an Embarrassment That No One Said "Baruch" Before Yisro?

Part of Shemot · 17:58

The Gemara says it was a disgrace to Moshe and the entire nation that no one blessed Hashem until Yisro arrived and did. A look at why a former idol-worshipper's admission was, in one specific sense, greater than anything Klal Yisrael itself had accomplished.

Audio Transcript
Why Was It an Embarrassment That No One Said โ€œBaruchโ€ Before Yisro?

In the beginning of Parshas Yisro, it says that after Yisro heard all about the miracles that Hashem did to the Bnei Yisrael, so the pasuk says in ืงืคื™ื˜ืœ ื™ืดื—, ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืณ, ื•ื™ืืžืจ ื™ืชืจื•, so Yisro said, ืดื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื,ืด blessed is ื”ืฉื, ืดืืฉืจ ื”ืฆื™ืœ ืืชื›ื,ืด that He saved you. So the Gemara says in Sanhedrin ื“ืฃ ืฆืดื“ ืขืžื•ื“ ืืณ, and also brought down in the Mechilta on the pasuk, that ื’ื ืื™ ื”ื•ื ืœืžืฉื” ื•ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื, it's an embarrassment for Moshe Rabbeinu and the 600,000 Jews, ืฉืœื ืืžืจื• ื‘ืจื•ืš, that they didn't say ื‘ืจื•ืš, ืขื“ ืฉื‘ื ื™ืชืจื• ื•ืืžืจ ื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื, till Yisro came and he said, ืดื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื.ืด So lichorah we have to understand what does the Gemara mean that they didn't say baruch, that Moshe and the Bnei Yisrael didn't say baruch, which seems to be saying that they didn't thank Hashem? Didn't Moshe and the Bnei Yisrael say the whole shirah after ืงืจื™ืขืช ื™ื ืกื•ืฃ? And even though they did not use the term baruch, but what is so special about using the expression baruch? So they used other expressions to show their thanks to Hashem. We cannot say that they only said shirah for ืงืจื™ืขืช ื™ื ืกื•ืฃ, and not for Yetzias Mitzrayim, and that's what the Gemara means, that it's an embarrassment for them that they did not thank Hashem for Yetzias Mitzrayim till Yisro came, and he thanked Hashem for Yetzias Mitzrayim, because if this is what the Gemara meant, then havi ikar chaser min hasefer, the main part is missing. Then it shouldn't have said that it's a genai for Moshe and the Bnei Yisrael that they didn't say ื‘ืจื•ืš ืขื“ ืฉื‘ื ื™ืชืจื• ื•ืืžืจ ื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื, till Yisro came and said, ืดื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื.ืด It should have said that it's a genai for Moshe and the ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื that they didn't thank Hashem for Yetziat Mitzrayim till Yisro came. But that is not mentioned at all in this maamar Chazal. Obviously this is not what Chazal mean. So the question is, what do Chazal mean when they said that it's an embarrassment for Moshe and the ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื that they didn't say baruch till Yisro came and he said, ืดื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉืืด?

The Zoharโ€™s Claim: Without Yisro, No Torah

To understand the pshat in this Chazal, we first have to bring in what it says in the Zohar, in the second ื—ืœืง, ื“ืฃ ืกืดื– ืขืžื•ื“ ื‘ืณ, and also ื“ืฃ ืกืดื— ืขืžื•ื“ ืืณ, that till Yisro came and he thanked Hashem, the Torah couldn't have been given. Only after Yisro came and he said, ืดื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื ืืฉืจ ื”ืฆื™ืœ ืืชื›ื,ืด thank Hashem that He saved you, and then he continued and he said, ืดืขืชื” ื™ื“ืขืชื™ ื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืฉื ืžื›ืœ ื”ืืœื”ื™ื,ืด that now I see that Hashem is greater than all the gods, only that caused, as the expression of the Zohar is, that ื“ืื™ืกืชืœืง ืงื•ื“ืฉื ื‘ืจื™ืš ื”ื•ื ื‘ื™ืงืจื™ื”, that there was the revelation of the glory of ื”ืฉื, ืขื™ืœื ื•ืชืชื, up and down, ื•ืœื‘ืชืจ ื™ื”ื™ื‘ ืื•ืจื™ื™ืชื ื‘ืฉืœื™ืžื•, and only then He gave the Torah completely. So it comes out from the Zohar that if not for Yisro thanking Hashem, and not for Yisro saying that now I see Hashem is greater than all the gods, the Torah wouldn't have been given. So lichorah we have to understand what does the Zohar mean? How can we say that the great madregah of Moshe and Aharon and all other ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื ืžื™ืฉืจืืœ before Yisro came was not enough that the Torah should be given? Only after Yisro came and he admitted and thanked Hashem, and he said, ืดื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืฉื ืžื›ืœ ื”ืืœื”ื™ื,ืด only then Hashem gave the Torah. What is the peshat? What is the great maalah that Yisro said that?

Who Was Yisro? Master of Every False Philosophy

The answer to this is that we know that Yisro was from the greatest chachamim in his time, the greatest scholar in his time. When it says that Yisro said now I know that Hashem is greater than all the gods, and the peshat is that he was ืžื›ื™ืจ ื›ืœ ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” ืฉื‘ืขื•ืœื, as Rashi brings down, that he recognized, he knew every ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” in the world, it doesn't mean just that he worshipped every ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”, he tried it, but that means he understood the philosophy of every ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” in the world. Because every ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” had its own philosophy, and he understood all the philosophies of all the ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื•ืช, because he was a great chacham. This is the reason why the Torah starts off, ืดื•ื™ืฉืžืข ื™ืชืจื• ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ ื—ื•ืชืŸ ืžืฉื” ืืช ื›ืœ ืืฉืจ ืขืฉื” ืืœืงื™ื,ืด that Yisro, the kohen, the priest of Midyan, who was the father-in-law of Moshe, heard everything that Hashem did. And the question that comes up right away: why does the Torah have to say ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ? We know already that Yisro was the ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ. One reason is, because as Rashi says, that the Torah wants to tell us that even though Yisro was so rich and he lived ื‘ื›ื‘ื•ื“ื• ืฉืœ ืขื•ืœื, in the honor of the world, nevertheless, he gave it all up to come to the desert to learn Torah. And that's why the Torah stresses that Yisro, who was a ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ, nevertheless, he came to the desert. But this only fits if we say that the word ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ means that he was the sar, he was the prince of Midyan, because the Mechilta learns that peshat in the word ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ, similar to what Rashi says in ืคืจืฉืช ื•ื™ื’ืฉ, ืงืคื™ื˜ืœ ืžืดื–, ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื‘. and in ืฉืžื•ืช, ืงืคื™ื˜ืœ ื‘ืณ, ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื–. But there's another pshat in kohen. Kohen could mean a priest to ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”, as it says in the Mekhilta in the beginning of Parashat Yitro. Now according to that pshat, then the word ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ doesn't bring out that he was rich or that he lived ื‘ื›ื‘ื•ื“ื• ืฉืœ ืขื•ืœื. It just says that he was a komer, a priest to ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. Now according to that pshat, why does the Torah mention ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ? Does the Torah want to embarrass him? Does the Torah have to stress the point that he used to be a komer, that he used to be a priest for ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”? We know that the Torah is always careful not to embarrass anybody. As the Gemara says, that ืืคื™ืœื• ื‘ื’ื ื•ืช ื‘ื”ืžื” ื˜ืžืื” ืœื ื“ื™ื‘ืจ ื”ื›ืชื•ื‘. Even in the embarrassment of an unkosher behemah, the Torah doesn't speak about unless it's needed, as the Gemara says in ื‘ื‘ื ื‘ืชืจื ื“ืฃ ืงื›ืดื’ ืขืžื•ื“ ืืณ. Now certainly the Torah wouldn't be interested in embarrassing Yitro. So why does the Torah have to mention that he was a ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ, especially that we know already from before that he was a ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ? But the pshat is that even according to this pshat, the Torah also tells us the greatness of Yitro. Because when Yitro was the komer, the priest to ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”, it doesn't just mean that he did physical acts of worship to ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. This shows how smart he was. He understood the philosophy of the ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. And he wasn't just a komer to one ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”, but he understood, as we said before, the philosophy of all ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื•ืช. As the Rambam explains in the beginning of Hilchot Avodah Zarah, what is the philosophy of ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”? The philosophy of ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” is that they used to believe that Hashem gave over certain powers to the stars, to the moon, to the sun, to the different constellations, and that's why they used to worship it. They believed, for instance, that the heat comes from the sun, and the sun has its own power whether to give it or not. They believed that even though Hashem created the sun, and Hashem gave the sun the power to give light and heat, etc., but then Hashem dropped it, so to speak, and gave over the power to the sun that now it's completely in the control of the sun. And therefore, when you want the sun to give you heat or give you light, you have to pray to the sun. The truth is, we know that it's only ื›ื’ืจื–ืŸ ื‘ื™ื“ ื”ื—ื•ืฆื‘ ื‘ื•, which means that the sun is only like an ax in the hand of the chopper. When a person chops down a tree, he uses an ax. So the ax is only a kli, but it would make no sense to ask the ax to chop off your tree or to thank the ax for doing it, because the ax was just a kli in the hand of the person. So you have to ask the person to do it. The same here. The sun gives us heat, but it's in the hands of Hashem. The sun is only the tool the way Hashem gives us the heat or the light, and the same with the moon and the stars, whatever they give us. So it makes no sense to daven to the sun. You have to daven to Hashem that He should use the sun to give us light, to give us heat. But this was the mistake of the ืขื•ื‘ื“ื™ ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. That means that the ืขื•ื‘ื“ื™ ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” thought that there is a concept of a ืžืžื•ืฆืข, of a level in between Hashem and us, and that level has its own power. But this is ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. And the truth is, just like we have things in this physical world that are tools used by Hashem to give us our needs, that we are not allowed to, chas v'shalom, to think of them as a separate entity, but only as tools to Hashem, and ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” means that they do think that they have their own power. Similar to that is also in the spiritual worlds. In the spiritual worlds there are also levels through which the light, the glory, the hashpaah of Hashem goes through till it comes down to a lower world, and from there to a lower world, till it comes to this physical world. And all these levels are only tools in the hands of Hashem to bring down the hashpaah into the lower worlds. The philosophers of the ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”, some of them even had an understanding in the spiritual worlds, and there, too, they felt, they thought by mistake, that these levels that Hashem uses as a ืžืžื•ืฆืข to bring down his hashpaah have its own power. So when it says that Yitro recognized ื›ืœ ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” ืฉื‘ืขื•ืœื, it doesn't just mean that he worshipped every ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”, or he understood the philosophy of every ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” in the world, but it also means more than that. That in the spiritual worlds, he had an understanding in these different levels that Hashem uses to bring down the hashpaah from one level to the other, and that, too, to him was a form of ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. He thought that they have their own power, and he had an understanding in all these high levels. And therefore, when he said that now he recognizes ื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืณ ืžื›ืœ ืืœืงื™ื, that means that he recognizes that all these high spiritual levels, they are not really a separate entity and they have their own powers, but they are only ื›ื’ืจื–ืŸ ื‘ื™ื“ ื”ื—ื•ืฆื‘, they are only like the ax in the hand of the chopper, that they are only tools that Hashem uses. But all this brings out that Yitro was a great chacham. Chacham, he had an understanding in the deepest philosophies of the ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”'s. So now we understand how, why the Torah mentions that Yitro was the ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ, even according to the peshat that it meant that he was a priest of ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื”. Cause the question we had before is why does the Torah have to mention it? Mila if the peshat is that he was the prince of Midyan, that shows that he was rich, and he lived a ื›ื‘ื•ื“ ืฉืœ ืขื•ืœื, and nevertheless he came to the desert, that shows his greatness. But according to peshat that he was a priest of avodah zarah, what is the Torah trying to tell us? But now we understand, the Torah is trying to tell us that even though he was such a great philosopher and he knew the deepest inyanim of the philosophy of the avodah zarah's, nevertheless he too recognized the greatness of Hashem. And this is what the Torah is trying to bring out, that even though he was the ื›ื”ืŸ ืžื“ื™ืŸ, which means he was the greatest philosopher in his time, nevertheless he recognized that all his philosophy is false, and all is only in the hands of Hashem.

Wisdom Is Greatest When It Overcomes Folly

Now that we understand that, we'll understand what the Zohar means that only after Yisro came and he said, \"ื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืฉื ืžื›ืœ ืืœืงื™ื\", only then Hashem was able to give the Torah. And this is based on a different Zohar. It says in the Zohar, in the third ื—ืœืง, ื“ืฃ ืก\"ื– ืขืžื•ื“ ื‘', where he quotes the pasuk from ืงื”ืœืช, ืงืคื™ื˜ืœ ื‘' ืคืกื•ืง ื™\"ื’, where it says, \"ื•ืจืื™ืชื™ ืื ื™ ืฉื™ืฉ ื™ืชืจื•ืŸ ืœื—ื›ืžื” ืžืŸ ื”ืกื›ืœื•ืช\", and I saw that there is a specialty in chochmah, in wisdom, over ืกื›ืœื•ืช, which means stupidity. Now the question is, who has to tell us that, that chochmah has more than ืกื›ืœื•ืช, than stupidity? Everyone understands that chochmah is greater than ืกื›ืœื•ืช. But the peshat the Zohar says here is, ืกื›ืœื•ืช doesn't mean simple stupidity. ืกื›ืœื•ืช refers to chochmah of ืœืขื•ืžืช ื–ื”, ื—ื›ืžื” of the ืกื˜ืจื ืื—ืจื, ื—ื›ืžื” of avodah zarah, etc., chochmah of the other side of the world, which means chochmah of the evil side of the world. But even that the pasuk doesn't have to tell us, that chochmah which is kedushah, chochmah of Torah, is greater than the chochmah of ืœืขื•ืžืช ื–ื”, the ื—ื›ืžื•ืช ื—ื™ืฆื•ื ื™ื•ืช, the ื—ื›ืžื” of the world. That also is self-understood. What the pasuk is really telling us, the Zohar says, that when is the expression of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื” in its greatest, when it comes after ืกื›ืœื•ืช. When the ื—ื›ืžื” of the sitra achra is bent, is destroyed, and then you reach the ื—ื›ืžื” of ืงื“ื•ืฉื”, so then the ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื” is much stronger. Similar to what the pasuk continues there and says, just like there is the ื™ืชืจื•ืŸ ื”ืื•ืจ ืžืŸ ื”ื—ื•ืฉืš, that there is a specialty, a maalah in light over darkness. That, too, everyone understands that there is a maalah in light over darkness. Why does the pasuk have to tell us that? But the peshat is that the pasuk is telling us that not only is light better than darkness, but when is the light stronger? When it comes after darkness. When a person is in a dark room and then he goes out into a light room, then the light is much stronger to him. And the same is here, concerning ื—ื›ืžื” and ืกื›ืœื•ืช. That when is the expression of the ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื” in its greatest, when it comes after ืกื›ืœื•ืช. When first there is ืกื›ืœื•ืช ื—ื›ืžื” of the sitra achra, and that ื—ื›ืžื” is bent and that ื—ื›ืžื” is changed, so then we reveal the true essence of the ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”. But if the ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื” doesn't come after the ื—ื›ืžื” of ืœืขื•ืžืช ื–ื”, then we don't feel the greatness and the revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”. So it comes out that being that Yitro, he represented the ื—ื›ืžื” of the sitra achra, he was the one that was ืžื›ื™ืจ, he recognized ื›ืœ ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” ืฉื‘ืขื•ืœื, which we said before means he understood the philosophy of all avodah zarah's. So he was the epitome of ื—ื›ืžื” of the sitra achra. So when he came and he said, \"ื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืฉื ืžื›ืœ ืืœืงื™ื\", he said that all the ื—ื›ืžื” of the avodah zarah, the deepest philosophy of avodah zarah is all false, because the only Being is Hashem and He is the one who controls everything. So then there was able to be the expression and the revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”. As we said before, that only after ื—ื›ืžื” of the sitra achra, only when that is bent, that's when the true revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื” comes. And this is what the Zohar means, that before Yitro came and he said, \"ื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืฉื ืžื›ืœ ืืœืงื™ื\", there couldn't be Matan Torah. Which means that there couldn't have been the great revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”, which came by Matan Torah, because there was no ืกื›ืœื•ืช that was bent yet. But when Yitro came and he represented the ืกื›ืœื•ืช, the chochmah of the ืกื˜ืจื ืื—ืจื, and when he bent the chochmah of the ืกื˜ืจื ืื—ืจื, that brought about the greatest revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”, which came by Matan Torah. So this answers the question, how is it possible that the greatness of Moshe Rabbeinu, and Aharon, and Miriam, and all the Bnei Yisrael was not enough to bring Matan Torah, but only when Yitro came, that's when Hashem Hashem revealed the Torah, it is because, as we said before, they had no connection to ืกื›ืœื•ืช. Moshe and Aharon, etc., etc., had no connection to the chochmah of the ืกื˜ืจื ืื—ืจื. But when Yitro came, and he represented the chochmah of the ืกื˜ืจื ืื—ืจื, and he admitted to Hashem, so then we had the ื™ืชืจื•ืŸ ื”ื—ื›ืžื” ืžืŸ ื”ืกื›ืœื•ืช, so that's when there was this great revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”, which was Matan Torah.

Resolving the Gemara: What "Baruch" Really Means

This also will explain the ืžืืžืจ ื—ื–ืดืœ that we said in the beginning, that it says that ื’ื ืื™ ื”ื•ื ืœืžืฉื” ื•ืœืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื, it was an embarrassment for Moshe and the Bnei Yisrael, that no one said baruch till Yitro came and he said Baruch Hashem. And we asked the question, but didn't they say shirah? What the Chazal mean is, the word baruch, as we know, has another meaning. It doesn't only mean thanking, or blessing, or praising. Baruch also means bringing down, as the lashon of the Chazal in Kilayim, the beginning of ืคืจืง ื–, ื”ืžื‘ืจื™ืš ืืช ื”ื’ืคืŸ, when you bring down the vine. Or the lashon in Chumash we find ื•ื™ื‘ืจืš ืืช ื”ื’ืžืœื™ื, that means he made them bend down. So the word ื‘ืจื•ืš means to bring down. When he said Baruch Hashem, what really happened was, he brought down Hashem into this world. As we said before, he was the one that caused that Hashem should come down to this world and give us the Torah. If not for him, this wouldn't have happened. If not for him, there wasn't no ื™ืชืจื•ืŸ ื”ื—ื›ืžื” ืžืŸ ื”ืกื›ืœื•ืช, and therefore, as the Zohar says, there wouldn't be ืžืชืŸ ืชื•ืจื”. So he brought down the true revelation of ื—ื›ืžื” ื“ืงื“ื•ืฉื”. So the Chazal don't only mean the expression that he said Baruch, Baruch Hashem, but it means what he accomplished was greater than what Moshe Rabbeinu and Aharon and the ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื ืžื™ืฉืจืืœ accomplished. It was only Yitro who accomplished this inyan of Baruch Hashem, of bringing down Hashem into this world. And this is what the Chazal mean, that it's like an embarrassment almost for Moshe and the ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื, that till Yitro came, no one said Baruch Hashem. That means that till Yitro came, there couldn't have been Baruch Hashem, there couldn't have been the true bringing down of Hashem into this world, to ืžืชืŸ ืชื•ืจื”. But only when Yitro came, and he said ื›ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ืฉื ืžื›ืœ ืืœื”ื™ื, and Yitro said Baruch Hashem, but not only that he said Baruch Hashem, but he accomplished the Baruch Hashem. He accomplished the inyan of bringing down Hashem. So it was only he that did it, and therefore it's almost like a ื’ื ืื™ to Moshe. It doesn't mean chas veshalom it's a ื’ื ืื™ because it wasn't their fault. They had no connection to ืกื›ืœื•ืช, they had no connection to the ื—ื›ืžื” of the sitra achra. But nevertheless, being that they didn't accomplish it, and Yitro did accomplish it, we refer to it as a genai. But what the Chazal mean is, that the ืฉืฉื™ื ืจื™ื‘ื•ื of Bnei Yisrael and Moshe Rabbeinu could not accomplish the ื‘ืจื•ืš. It doesn't mean that they did not thank Hashem, they thanked Him by the ืฉื™ืจื”, but they didn't accomplish the bringing down of Hashem, but Yisro did accomplish the Baruch Hashem.

NOW PLAYING Choose a shiur to begin Rabbi Yehuda Leib Schapiro
0:00
0:00