Zichronos book cover Zichronos is in print! Order your copy on Amazon
THE LIBRARY

Pekudei

All Yom Tov General Knowledge Parsha Talmud Ein Yaakov Likkutei Sichos Bitachon and Emunah Farbrengens Zichronos Uncategorized

← All of Shemot

16:37

Rabbi Schapiro on the Parshah: Pekudei

SHEMOT

The word "Mishkan" appears twice in the opening verse, hinting, Chazal say, at the two Batei Mikdash that would later be destroyed. A look at why the Torah describes that loss as a mashkon, a pledge rather than a loss — and what that means for whether the Beis Hamikdash is truly gone at all.

Parshas Pekudei

SHEMOT

Works through the Rebbe's questions on a Yerushalmi that ties the number of berachos in Shemoneh Esrei to a phrase repeated specifically in the account of the second Mishkan, and specifically from the point where Oholiav is mentioned alongside Betzalel. The resolution: both tefillah and the Mishkan take the lowest and elevate it, so the count applies only once Oholiav, from the lowly Shevet Dan, enters the picture.

Parshas Pekudei

SHEMOT

Works through the Rebbe's questions on a Yerushalmi that ties the number of berachos in Shemoneh Esrei to a phrase repeated specifically in the account of the second Mishkan, and specifically from the point where Oholiav is mentioned alongside Betzalel. The resolution: both tefillah and the Mishkan take the lowest and elevate it, so the count applies only once Oholiav, from the lowly Shevet Dan, enters the picture.

Parshas Pekudei

SHEMOT

Asks why the parsha describing the Mishkan's construction closes with an account of it traveling, once the cloud of glory departed, rather than simply resting in place. The answer locates two eras within the two positions of the Mishkan, revelation and concealment, and shows that the Mishkan's real purpose was never only to house revealed Godliness, but to grant the capacity for avodah and for bringing down Elokus even when the cloud is gone.

Parshas Pekudei

SHEMOT

Unpacks three difficulties in a well-known Rashi: why the Torah would hint to future Batei Mikdash through their destruction, why Rashi phrases the hint in the singular despite there being two, and why he adds that the destructions came because of Israel's sins. The resolution reframes Mishkan as mashkon, collateral that is never truly lost, showing that all three Batei Mikdash are in essence one, held in trust and waiting to be returned through teshuvah.

NOW PLAYING Choose a shiur to begin Rabbi Yehuda Leib Schapiro
0:00
0:00