7 Adar: Part 2
Why the parshah that omits Moshe Rabbeinu's name is really the deepest expression of his presence.
Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Adar · 16:39
Explores the well-known observation that Parshat Tetzaveh, read around Moshe Rabbeinu's yahrzeit of 7 Adar, is the only parshah since his birth that never mentions his name, despite being addressed to him directly as ืืืชื. Using the Zohar's teaching that a tzaddik is found in every world, including this one, more after his passing than during his lifetime, distinguishes between a name, which reveals only the superficial gilui of a person, and the word atah, which points to his essence. Ties this idea to the gematria of ืชืฆืื (501, one beyond the revelation-level 500) and the 101 pesukim of the parshah, both pointing to the essence that remains beyond the revealed name.
Audio Transcript
We all know that ื' ืืืจ, the seventh day of ืืืจ, is the day that ืืฉื ืจืืื ื was ื ืกืชืืง. It is the ืืืจืฆืืื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, as the ืืืจื says in ืืืืื ืืฃ ื\"ื ืขืืื ื', and is also brought down in ืืืืืช ืชืขื ืืช, the ืืืืจ ืืืืจืื, the last ืืืืจ. And that's how we ืคืกืงื 'ื in ืฉืืืื ืขืจืื, in the ืืืจ and in the ืฉืืืื ืขืจืื, ืืืจื ืืืื, ืกืืื ืชืง\"ืค. Now, usually ื' ืืืจ comes out on ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื. And it says in ืืืืจ ืขืื ืื, ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื, and many other ืกืคืจืื, that there is a ืจืื in ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื to the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. Because ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื is the only ืกืืจื in the whole ืชืืจื, after ืคืจืฉืช ืฉืืืช when ืืฉื ืจืืื ื was born, where ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's name is not mentioned. As it says in the ืืืืจ, ืืืง ื' ืืฃ ืจื\"ื ืขืืื ื', and also in ืืืืจ ืืืฉ, ืฉืืจ ืืฉืืจืื, close to the end, and the ืจื\"ืฉ, the ืคืืจืืฉ ืืจื\"ืฉ ืขื ืืืืฉ, which is on ืืขืช ืืงื ืื, and the ืืขื ืืืืจืื, ืคืขื ื ืจืื, ืจืืืชืื ื ืืขืื ืืชืืกืคืืช, and many other ืกืคืจืื explain that this is the only ืกืืจื from when ืืฉื ืจืืื ื was born that ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's name is not mentioned. So the ืืืืจ ืขืื ืื says that the reason for this is because this is a ืจืื for the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. This is a hint for ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's ืืืจืฆืืื. That his name is missing, that's a ืจืื to the fact that he was missing, that he was ื ืกืชืืง. But ืืืืืจื, this is not so clear, because in ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื only his name is not mentioned, which means his name, the name ืืฉื doesn't say there ืืคืืจืืฉ. But there are many ืคืกืืงืื in ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื that refer to ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. Starting from the first ืคืกืืง of the ืคืจืฉื, it says ืืืชื ืชืฆืื. ืืืชื ืชืฆืื means you should command. Who is the you? ืืฉื ืจืืื ื! So the ืชืืจื does talk about ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. So ืืืืืจื, how can we say that there is a ืจืื in this ืคืจืฉื to the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื when the ืคืจืฉื talks about ืืฉื? And another question: How can we say that by not mentioning the name of a ืฆืืืง, this is a ืจืื for the ืืกืชืืงืืช of the ืฆืืืง? ืืืจืื, when a ืฆืืืง passes away from the world, this doesn't affect his name or his actions, that remains forever. His name is not forgotten. What's missing is the body of the ืฆืืืง, but the name is not missing. So why, when we want to hint the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, it is hinted by not mentioning his name? Then there's another question: ืืืืืจื, the way it's in ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื is even more than the way it's in other ืคืจืฉืืืช. In other ืคืจืฉืืืช, where ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's name is mentioned, in many places it is when the ืชืืจื talks about ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. So ืืืืืจื, we're only talking about him. In the way the ืชืืจื is written in ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื, the ืฆืืืืื were said to ืืฉื ืจืืื ื directly. It says ืชืฆืื, ืืขืฉืืช, ืืืงืืช, you should do. So here, as if the ืชืืจื is talking to him directly ืืืฉืื ื ืืื. So ืืืืืจื, this expresses more the existence of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื than ืืืื the other ืคืจืฉืืืช. When we talk about ืืฉื ืจืืื ื and we mention his name, so even though his name is mentioned, but it doesn't mean that he's around. We could be talking about him years later, after he already was ื ืกืชืืง. But when the ืชืืจื is speaking to him, the ืชืืจื is telling us what was said to him, ืืืชื ืชืฆืื or ืืืงืืช, so then obviously he is there. So even though his name is not mentioned, but ืืืืืจื, this shows more of his existence than by writing his name. So how can we say that this is a hint to the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื?
But the ืคืฉื in this is as follows: It says in the ืืืืจ in ืืืง ื' ืืฃ ืข\"ื ืขืืื ื' that ืฆืืืงื ืืืืชืคืืจ, when a ืฆืืืง passes away, ืืฉืชืื ืืืืืื ืขืืืื ืืชืืจ ืืืืืืื, he is found in all the worlds, including this physical world, more than at the time when he was alive. ืืืืืจื, how can we say he is found in this world more than at the time when he was alive? But the ืคืฉื is, it's explained in ืืืจืช ืืงืืืฉ of the ืืืืขืจ ืจืื, of the ืืขื ืืชื ืื, ืกืืื ื\"ื, that the ืคืฉื is, before he passed away, he was ืืืืืฉ in a ืืืฃ. He was put in a body, and a body is limited. So therefore, the people who wanted to have a ืงืฉืจ, a connection to the ืฆืืืง, or wanted to learn from the ืฆืืืง, etc., etc., were limited to the body of the ืฆืืืง. You had to go to the place of the ืฆืืืง, you had to listen to the words of the ืฆืืืง. You couldn't do it in the place where you live, you had to go to the ืฆืืืง. So you were limited. Now that the ืฆืืืง passed away, and he is not dressed in a body anymore, now you could connect yourself to the ืฆืืืง wherever you are, because the ืฆืืืง's ื ืฉืื is not limited to a place, it's not limited to his body. And also another thing: We know that when a ื ืฉืื comes down into this world, and it's put into a body, the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื, the essence of the ื ืฉืื does not come down into the body. It doesn't mean that the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื doesn't have a connection to the part of the ื ืฉืื which is in the body, but still it doesn't actually come into the body. Because the body is limited, so the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื, the essence of the ื ืฉืื, cannot be dressed into the body. And this actually applies to every single ืืื, that we say that the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื does not come into the body. It doesn't mean that the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื does not have a connection to the person the way he is down here; it definitely does. That's why it says sometimes a person could be walking in the street and get a ืืชืขืืจืจืืช ืชืฉืืื, get awakened to do ืชืฉืืื, and he doesn't know where it came from. He wasn't thinking about it, he wasn't learning about it. So it says, because the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื the way it is ืืืขืื, above, throws these thoughts into the person, and therefore it comes into his mind. But still, even though it has an effect on the person, but the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื stays ืืืขืื, stays above, because the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื is so great that it cannot come into a body. There is so much ืงืืืฉื there that it not cannot come into the limits of the physical body. And the same is with a ืฆืืืง also, that the ื ืฉืื that's in the body is only, as we would call it, the ืืืืื ืื ืฉืื, the revelation of the ื ืฉืื, the revealed part, the superficial part of the ื ืฉืื which is down here, but the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื stays ืืืขืื. When the ืฆืืืง passes away, so then he goes back to his ืขืฆื, and now his ืืืืื of the ื ืฉืื, the part of the ื ืฉืื that came down to this world, is one with his ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื. So we can understand that when we say that even after the ืฆืืืง passes away, the ืชืืืืืื or any other ืืื who wants to have a ืงืฉืจ, a connection to the ืฆืืืง, is able to do it even more than before, because now there is no limit of a body. So there is another point here: not only is it not limited to space, and he can connect himself to the ืฆืืืง wherever he is, but more than that, he connects himself to the ืฆืืืง the way the ืฆืืืง is now. And now the ืฆืืืง is connected to the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื, the ืขืฆื of the ืฆืืืง. And that's the ืคืฉื in the ืืืืจ, that ืฆืืืงื ืืืชืคืืจ ืืฉืชืื ืืืืืื ืขืืืื ืืชืืจ ืืืืืืื, that when a ืฆืืืง passes away, he is in all worlds including in this world more than before. What's the ืคืฉื more than before? So it's for these two reasons: because now he is not limited to the body, and also, it's not limited to the level of the ืืืืื of the ื ืฉืื, but now there is the ืขืฆื ืื ืฉืื. So the people who want to have this ืืชืงืฉืจืืช, this connection to the ืฆืืืง, are able to have it with the ืขืฆื of the ื ืฉืื of the ืฆืืืง, not only with the ืืืืื of the ื ืฉืื, with the lower levels of the ื ืฉืื. So it comes out that even though on one hand we say when the ืฆืืืง is ืืกืชืืง, he goes awayโthat's why we call it ืืกืชืืงืืช, ืืกืชืืงืืช means going away, his ื ืฉืื leaves this worldโbut on the other hand, what leaves this world? The ืืืืื of the ืฆืืืง, the revelation of the ืฆืืืง. But the ืขืฆื of the ืฆืืืง remains in this world, and ืืืจืื, more than before, as the ืืืืจ says.
Now this will explain why the ืืกืชืืงืืช, the passing away of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, is hinted in the fact that his name is not mentioned in the ืคืจืฉื, and at the same time, he is spoken about in the ืคืจืฉื even more than other ืคืจืฉืืืช. The name of a person is not the ืขืฆื ืืฆืืืืช of the person, it's not the essence of the person's being. The ืขื ืื of a name is only in relationship to others. In order that somebody else should be able to call him or talk about him, he has to have a name. But a person for himself doesn't need name. And as we see that a name is not given to a child only many days after he is born. The ืืฆืืืืช of the child is there from the moment he is born. ืขื ืคื ืืืื, the moment a child is born, he is considered a ืืฆืืืืช, a being ืขื ืคื ืืืื, and therefore ืืืื the ืืื ืื of ืืจืืฉื, of inheritance, if he is only a day old, a minute old, he is considered a ืืืจืฉ, he inherits, because he is considered a ืืฆืืืืช, and he still doesn't have a name. So we see that a name of a person is not the ืขืฆื of the person. But when we talk to a person and we say \"you\", ืืชื, we are referring to the ืขืฆื of the person. As it says in the ืืืืจ concerning ืืฉื, that the ืขืฉืจืช ืืืืจืืช started with the three words ืื ืื ืืฉื ืืืงืื, so the ืืืืจ explains the difference between the name ืืฉื, which is ืืืืณ and ืืืงืื, and ืื ืื. And the ืืืืจ says that the names, whether it's the name ืืืงืื or even the name ืืืืณ which is called the ืฉื ืืขืฆื, ืฉื ืืืคืืจืฉ, but it's still a name, and a name refers to a certain detail. But the word ืื ืื, \"I\", that refers to the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื. That is a word which ืื ืืชืจืืื ืื ืืฉืื ืืืช ืืื ืืฉืื ืงืืฅ ืืื ืืฉืื ืฉื. That's a level so to speak, it cannot be described with any name, with any hint, and that's \"I\", ืื ืื. And the same is when we talk to ืืฉื, we also use the three words, we say ืืจืื ืืชื ืืฉื ืืืงืื ื, so we use the two names, ืืฉื, which is ืืืืณ and ืืืงืื ื, but we also start off by saying ืืชื, \"you\", and this refers to the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื. \"You\" meaning the level which is beyond any description, and that is ืืชื. And the same is concerning a person. When we talk to a person and we say \"you\", it means the whole person, the whole ืขืฆื of the person. While if we call him by a name, the name is not the ืขืฆื of the person. And that is the reason, when we want to hint to the ืืกืชืืงืืช, to the passing away of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, it is hinted by not mentioning his name, but on the other hand, speaking to ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, ืืืชื ืชืฆืื, because the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, what happened? ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's ืืืืื, the way he was down here in this world, went away, and therefore the name is not mentioned. The name shows not for the ืขืฆื, but for the superficial part of the person. So the name of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื went away, but at the same time, ืืฉื ืจืืื ื did not leave. ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's ืขืฆื remained down here more than it was before. As the ืืืจื says in ืกืืื ืืฃ ืื ืขืืื ื, and also in ืกืคืจื ืคืจืฉืช ืืจืื, ืงืคืืื ืื ืคืกืืง ื, and the ืจืืืดื brings it in the ืืงืืื to his ืคืืจืืฉ ืืืฉื ืืืช, that just like ืืฉื ืจืืื ื before was ืขืืื ืืืฉืืฉ, ืืฉื ืจืืื ื stood and served the ืื ื ืืฉืจืื, ืืฃ ืืื ืขืืื ืืืฉืืฉ, now ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is also ืืฉืืฉ, also serving the ืื ื ืืฉืจืื, and ืืืจืื, the way it's now, he is serving them with his ืขืฆื. Now he is more with the ืขืฆื. The ืืืื are connected to ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, more to the essence of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. And therefore, ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is mentioned in the ืคืจืฉื, but not by name, but ืืืชื ืชืฆืื, speaking to ืืฉื because he is here, and he is here in the form of ืืืชื. And as the ืืื ืืงืจ in this ืคืจืฉื says, that the word ืืืชื shows ืขื ืืืืช ืขืฆืืืชื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, the ืืืืช of the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื.
Now since we said that this is an ืจืื in ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื, and the name of the ืคืจืฉื is ืชืฆืื, so we find another ืจืื in the word ืชืฆืื to this ืขื ืื that we were explaining. The word ืชืฆืื, ืช ืฆ ื ื, is ืืืืืืจืื ืช ืง ื, 501. The numerical value of the word ืชืฆืื is 501. What is the ืขื ืื of 501? So we know what the ืืืดื say in ืงืืืช ืจืื, ืคืจืฉื ื, ื, it's also brought down in ืืืจืฉ ืฉืืืื, ืคืจืง ืื, that ืืื ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื ืืืื ืืืฉ ืืืืช ืฉื ื ืืงื ืืช ืื ืฉื, that ืืฉื went a ืืืื of 500 years to get himself a name. Now this refers to ืืฉื coming down to this world, and creating the world, and giving the ืชืืจื, and it says in the ืืืจื that from ืฉืืื to ืืจืฅ is 500 years, it takes 500 years to go, that's it. So ืืฉื went a stretch of 500 years for what? ืืงื ืืช ืื ืฉื, to be ืงืื ื for himself, to acquire for himself a name. So right away we see the connection between 500 and ืฉื, and the ืขื ืื of a name. Because through ืืฉื coming down to this world, what happened? There was a revelation of ืฉืื ืฉื ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื, the name of ืืฉื. And as we said before, the name refers to a level of the person that is in relations to others, and the same with is ืืฉื. ืืฉื came down so others, the people of the world, should recognize his name. So this is not the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื, this is the way ืืฉื revealed himself to the world. And we see that this is connected to the number 500. 501, which is one more than 500, that shows the addition of the ืืื, which is ืืืืื ืฉื ืขืืื, to the 500, to the ืฉื. So this refers to the ืขืฆื, to the essence which is higher than the ืืืืื. It comes out that 500 represents the concept of a name, which is the revelation, the superficial part of the person or in this case of ืืฉื, ืืืืืื. 501, which is the one beyond that, that refers to the level of the ืขืฆื which is higher than the concept of ืืืืื, of the revelation which is in connection to others. And therefore ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื, which we said is in connection to ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's ืืกืชืืงืืช, and as we explained, the ืืกืชืืงืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื was only in the name of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, in the ืืืืื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, but the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is found even more now. Therefore ืชืฆืื, which is, as the ืืื ืืงืจ says, the ืขืฆื ืืืืช of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, is ืืืืืืจืื 501, is the one over the 500.
And there's another interesting thing here. In ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื we find that we have 101 ืคืกืืงืื. The concept of 101 is similar to the concept of 501. As the ืืืจืฉืดื says in ืืืืื ืืฃ ื ืขืืื ื, concerning what the ืืืจื says, ืืื ื ืืืื ืฉืื ื ืคืจืงื ืืื ืคืขืืื ืืฉืื ื ืคืจืงื ืืื ืืืื. It's not the same, a person who learns, his ืคืจืง means his ืฉืืขืืจ, his learning, his ืืืจื, a 100 times, ืืืื someone who learns 101 times. And the ืืืจืฉืดื explains that the ืืกืคืจ, the number 100, is connected to ื ืคืฉ, ืจืื, ื ืฉืื. But the one over the 100, he says, is ืืืง ืืืืงื ืืืขื. Which to translate it, to change it into other words, it means that the number 100, that refers to the person's, as we call them ืืืืืช ืืืืืืื, the revealed part of the person, but not the ืขืฆื of the person. The one over the 100, that refers to the ืขืฆื. As we know, there are 10 ืืืืืช in a person. Every person has 10 attributes which are ืืืื, ืืื ื, ืืขืช, ืืกื, ืืืืจื, ืชืคืืจืช, ื ืฆื, ืืื, ืืกืื, ืืืืืืช. Each one of the 10 is combined of the other other ten, so together it's a hundred. So a hundred represents all the ืืืืืช of the person, but the ืืืืืช only of the person. The ืขืฆื of the person, the essence of the person, which is beyond the ืืืืืช, because the ืืืืืช are already a part of the person that comes out into action, into doing, into feeling. But the ืขืฆื is beyond that, that is the one that is beyond the hundred. And that's why it says it's so important to learn a hundred and one, because when you learn a hundred times, then you're learning it with every ืื of your ื ืคืฉ. When you learn a hundred and one, then you have this one, you're learning it with your ืขืฆื already, which is beyond the ืืืืืช. So we see that the number a hundred and one also refers to the ืขืฆื, which is beyond the revealed superficial part of the person. And therefore, ืคืจืฉืช ืชืฆืื, which doesn't have the name of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื, which means it doesn't have the ืืืืื because ืืฉื ืจืืื ื was ื ืกืชืืง, passed away, but on the other hand it has the ืืืชื ืชืฆืื, it has the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื. So there are a hundred and one ืคืกืืงืื in this ืคืจืฉื to show that even though the ืืืืื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is not here, ืืฉื ืจืืื ื's name is not mentioned here, but still the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is here, and that's why it's a hundred and one. And all this shows that even though ืืฉื ืจืืื ื with his body is not in this world, but still the ืขืฆื of ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is here more than while he was alive in this world. And a ืืื is able to draw ืงืืืฉื and get a connection to ืืฉื ืจืืื ื now even more than it was while he was alive in this world. As the ืืืืจ says, ืืฆืืืงื ืืืกืชืืง ืืฉืชืื ืืืืืื ืขืืืื ืืชืืจ ืืืืืืื, he's in all worlds more than while he was alive, including in this world. So ืืฉื ืจืืื ื is here now more than before, and as the ืืืจื says that just like before he was ืขืืื ืืืฉืืฉ, ืืฃ ืืื ืขืืื ืืืฉืืฉ.