Zichronos book cover Zichronos is in print! Order your copy on Amazon
DAYS ON THE JEWISH CALENDAR: SHEVAT

Rosh Chodesh Shevat: Part 3

Why the two peshatim of Rosh Chodesh Shevat, that Moshe translated the Torah into seventy languages and that he began telling the Bnei Yisrael Sefer Devarim on his own understanding, turn out to be two expressions of the very same chiddush.

Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Shevat · 16:24

Chazal's statement that Moshe said Chumash Devarim 'mipi atzmo,' on his own, is reconciled with the principle that denying any single word of Torah is kefirah by explaining that Devarim alone passed through Moshe's own sechel before being written down, unlike the first four chumashim. That distinction is then used to explain why Nevi'im U'Ketuvim carry the status of divrei kabbalah and not only divrei nevuah, since Chumash Devarim serves as the yesod that first showed words shaped by a human seichel could still be Torah. The same chiddush is shown to be the source of Torah Sheba'al Peh itself, where a chacham's own reasoning becomes the vessel through which the ratzon and chochmah of Hashem are revealed.

Audio Transcript
Recap: The Two Peshatim of Rosh Chodesh Shevat and Why They Must Be Connected

In last shiur, we explained concerning Rosh Chodesh Shevat that pasuk says that on that day, ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ืžืฉื” ื‘ืืจ ืืช ื”ืชื•ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืœืืžืจ, that Moshe Rabbeinu started explaining the Torah, saying. And there are two perushim on that pasuk. One peshat is the simple peshat, that that day Moshe Rabbeinu started telling them Mishneh Torah, Chumash Devarim, and the other peshat that ื‘ืฉื‘ืขื™ื ืœืฉื•ืŸ ืคื™ืจืฉื” ืœื”ื, that Moshe Rabbeinu explained the Torah to them in 70 languages. And we said that both perushim, being that they are on the same pasuk, must have a connection. And we explained the peshat in the perush that he explained them the Torah in 70 languages, that lichorah, why did Moshe Rabbeinu have to do that? All the Yidden spoke ืœืฉื•ืŸ ืงื•ื“ืฉ, so why did he have to explain the Torah to them in 70 languages? And we explained that lichorah, since Hashem speaks ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ, and the Torah was given in ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ, so lichorah only if a person learns Torah in ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ, in Hebrew, he is mekayem the mitzvah of limud haTorah. But if it's not in the language of ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ, then this doesn't have a geder, a din of divrei Torah. And in order for Torah spoken in any language should have a din of divrei Torah, Moshe Rabbeinu explained them the Torah in all languages, and by doing that, he accomplished that the Torah that's learned in any language has a din of divrei Torah. So now we will explain the same concept applies to the second peshat in the pasuk, that Moshe Rabbeinu started telling them Mishneh Torah, Chumash Devarim.

The Puzzle of Chumash Devarim as โ€œMoshe Mipi Atzmoโ€: Written After Passing Through Moshe's Sechel

Because concerning Chumash Devarim, the Chazal say in Megillah ื“ืฃ ืœืดื ืขืžื•ื“ ื‘ืณ, that ืงืœืœื•ืช ืฉื‘ืžืฉื ื” ืชื•ืจื” ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื• ืืžืจื. That the kelalot, the tochachah of Mishneh Torah, which is in Parshat Ki Tavo, Moshe Rabbeinu said it on his own, not like the kelalot which is in Parshat Bechukotai, that ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ื”ื’ื‘ื•ืจื” ืืžืจื, that that Moshe said it from Hashem, but the ones in Parshat Ki Tavo Moshe said on his own. And the mefarshim explain, taking from the Zohar ื—ืœืง ื’ืณ ื“ืฃ ืจืกืดื ืขืžื•ื“ ืืณ and the Shach al HaTorah and the Or HaChaim in the beginning of Devarim, etc., etc., that what the Gemara there says does not refer davka to the kelalot of Mishneh Torah, but this refers to the whole Sefer Mishneh Torah, it's the whole Chumash Devarim. That the whole Chumash Devarim Moshe Rabbeinu said ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื•, on his own. But lichorah the mefarshim ask, the Abarbanel and many other mefarshim, that what is the peshat that Moshe Rabbeinu said Chumash Devarim on his own? Isn't the din, as the Rambam ืคืกืง in ื”ืœื›ื•ืช ืชืฉื•ื‘ื” ืคืจืง ื’ืณ ื”ืœื›ื” ื—ืณ, taking from the Gemara Sanhedrin ื“ืฃ ืฆืดื˜ ืขืžื•ื“ ื‘ืณ, that if a person says that ืื™ืŸ ื”ืชื•ืจื” ืžืขื ื”ืฉื, that the Torah is not from Hashem, and he says it ืืคื™ืœื• ืชื™ื‘ื” ืื—ืช, even concerning one word, if he says that ืžืฉื” ืืžืจื• ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื•, that Moshe said it on his own, ื”ืจื™ ื–ื” ื›ื•ืคืจ ื‘ืชื•ืจื”, that he's denying in the etzem of the Torah. And as the Rambam says in ื”ืœื›ื•ืช ืชืคื™ืœื” ืคืจืง ื™ืดื’ ื”ืœื›ื” ื•ืณ concerning the eight pesukim, the last eight pesukim of ื—ื•ืžืฉ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื, ืฉื”ื›ืœ ืชื•ืจื” ื”ื™ื ื•ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ื”ื’ื‘ื•ืจื” ืืžืจื”, that everything is Torah and Moshe said it from Hashem. So how could here the Gemara say that the whole of ื—ื•ืžืฉ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื• ืืžืจื, ืžืฉื” said it on his own? So the mefarshim explain, based on what Tosafot says there, ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื• ืืžืจื ื•ื‘ืจื•ื— ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ, that he said it on his own, but it was said with ruach hakodesh. Which means that even though we say it was ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื•, on his own, but it doesn't really mean on his own. It means that he said it on his own with ruach hakodesh. And as it's explained in many sefarim that the peshat is like this: all the other four chalakim of the ืชื•ืจื”, ื”ืฉื said it to Moshe and Moshe wrote it down. So they went through Moshe, Hashem gave it to us through Moshe, but it didn't go through a hitlabshut we call it, it wasn't dressed into the sechel of Moshe. It just went through Moshe. The lashon is it went through ื‘ื“ืจืš ืžืขื‘ืจ, it passed through Moshe. Hashem said it to Moshe and Moshe wrote it down, but it didn't go through the sechel of Moshe. Chumash Devarim went through the sechel of Moshe, which means Hashem said it to Moshe, Moshe understood it, and then Moshe Rabbeinu wrote it down. So ืœืคื•ืขืœ he wrote down the same words Hashem told him, but he wrote it down after he understood it with his sechel. While by the first four sefarim, Moshe wrote it down without going through his sechel to say that he understood it and after he understood it he wrote down what he understood. He just wrote down what he was told. While by Chumash Devarim, he wrote down what he understood, which really means it came from Hashem, uveruach hakodesh, but it also is called ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื• because it went through Moshe Rabbeinu's sechel. He understood what Hashem told him and that's what he wrote down.

Why Is Chumash Devarim Still Part of Torah, Not Nevi'im U'Ketuvim, Despite a Lower Madregah of Ruach HaKodesh?

But the question is, if that is so, why was Chumash Devarim put into the category of the ื—ืžื™ืฉื” ื—ื•ืžืฉื™ ืชื•ืจื”, into category of Torah? We know that ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื, the prophets were also written with ruach hakodesh of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื, just a different level of ruach hakodesh than the level of Moshe Rabbeinu. But it's still ruach hakodesh. But being that it's a different level of ruach hakodesh, it is not part of Chumash. It is not part of Torah, it is ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื. In the general concept it is Torah, we don't mean chas veshalom that it's not Torah, but when we're saying Torah here we mean the five chumashim. This is not part of the five chumashim. Why? Because it was not the same level as the first five chumashim. But the way we're explaining now, based on the Gemara in Megillah, that even the Chumash Devarim was also ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื•, Moshe said it on his own meaning it went through the sechel of Moshe, so it was not the same level as the first four chumashim, so then why is this in the same category as Torah? Why isn't Chumash Devarim in the category of ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื or ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื? But why is it in the category of Torah? But the answer is, we know what the Gemara says in ืชืขื ื™ืช ื“ืฃ ื˜ ืขืžื•ื“ ื, ืžื™ ืื™ื›ื ืžื™ื“ื™ ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘ื™ ื‘ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ ื“ืœื ืจืžื™ื–ื™ ื‘ืื•ืจื™ื™ืชื? Is there anything that's written in the ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื that is not hinted in the Torah? And Rashi explains it means, ื•ืœื ืจืžื–ื” ืžืฉื” ื‘ืื•ืจื™ื™ืชื, that Moshe shouldn't hint it in the Torah? And Rashi adds, ืฉื”ื—ื•ืžืฉ ื”ื•ื ื™ืกื•ื“ ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื. The Chumash is the foundation of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื. ื•ื‘ื›ื•ืœื ื™ืฉ ืกืžืš ืœืžืฆื ืžืŸ ื”ืชื•ืจื”. And in all of them, we find a ืกืžืš that we can find in the Torah. Which means that Rashi is telling us that the Chumash is the ื™ืกื•ื“ of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื. Which means like this, that just like we're saying that every concept that we find in ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื has a ื™ืกื•ื“, has a foundation in Torah, meaning in the Chumash, so too concerning the concept of it being Torah, the fact that the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื is Torah is also based on the Chumash. Meaning like this, the ืขื ื™ื ื™ื which are written in the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื and the ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื, which came through ื ื‘ื•ืื” and Ruach HaKodesh, and not only in the category of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื™ื, there were many words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื which are not put into the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื. They had a din of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื•ืื”, but they did not have a din of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. Those words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื which are written in the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื are not only words of a ื ื‘ื™ื, but they are also ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. The other things which were not written in the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื have the kedushah and they have all the categories of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื™ื, which is holy and it's words of Hashem etcetera etcetera, but it's not ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. The words which are written in the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื are ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. So therefore, you have to keep them not only because of the mitzvah that you have to listen to the ื ื‘ื™ื, but you have to keep them because there's a din in Torah that you have to keep ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”. The words of ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื are in a special category called ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”. And not to confuse it with the concept of ืงื‘ืœื”, which we know which are the ืกื•ื“ื•ืช ื”ืชื•ืจื”, the hidden parts of the Torah, we're talking here about the halachah'dike term. The words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื are called ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”. And we have to listen to what it says in ืชื ืดืš because there's a din that we have to listen to ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”. It is not the same chumra, the same strictness as divrei Torah, but nevertheless there's a chiyuv to listen to ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”, stronger, even more than we have to listen to ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืกื•ืคืจื™ื, to the rabbanan, we have to listen to ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”. So we don't only have to listen to the words of ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื because they are ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื™ื, they are words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื, and there's a din that you must listen to a ื ื‘ื™ื, but this has a separate category. In addition to ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื™ื, it is also divrei Torah in the level of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืงื‘ืœื”. Now, what brought within the words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื the concept of being divrei Torah? The fact that ื—ื•ืžืฉ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื is similar to the words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื, and nevertheless this is part of Chumash, part of Torah. Because as we said before, Rashi says that the Chumash is the ื™ืกื•ื“ for the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื, so it doesn't only mean the ื™ืกื•ื“ to the ืชื•ื›ืŸ, the words, the concepts which are written in ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื, so they're all taken from Chumash, but the ืขืฆื thing that ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื have a din of divrei Torah is taken from Chumash. And that is through the fact that ื—ื•ืžืฉ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื, ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื• ืืžืจื•, ืžืฉื” said it on his own, meaning that he said it not in the same level of ruach hakodesh as the first four ืกืคืจื™ื, even though it is ืžืคื™ ื”ื’ื‘ื•ืจื” from Hashem, as we explained before, but still it's not the same level as the first four, and still this is part of Torah, part of Chumash. This is the foundation that even the words of a ื ื‘ื™ื, which are not in the same level of ืจื•ื— ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ as Chumash, are also part of Torah. So now we see the similarity between this pshat and the other pshat. As said before on this ืคืกื•ืง where it says that ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ืžืฉื” ื‘ืืจ ืืช ื”ืชื•ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืœืืžืจ, that Moshe started explaining the Torah, and we said there are two pshatim, one pshat is that he explained the Torah to them in 70 languages. The other pshat is that he started telling them Chumash Devarim. And we said that since there are two pshatim on the same ืคืกื•ืง, there must be a connection between the two. Now we see the connection, because the pshat that he explained to them the Torah in 70 languages was in order to accomplish that when you learn Torah in another language, it should have a ื’ื“ืจ, a ื“ื™ืŸ of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. The same is concerning the other pshat, that when Moshe told them Chumash Devarim, this accomplished the same thing. This accomplished that the words of a ื ื‘ื™ื have a ื“ื™ืŸ of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. Because if not for that, we would say that the words of a ื ื‘ื™ื, which are written in ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื, have a ื“ื™ืŸ of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื™ื, but they don't have a ื“ื™ืŸ of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”. But now that Moshe Rabbeinu said Chumash Devarim, which is similar to the category of ื ื‘ื•ืื”, and nevertheless this is part of Torah, so this was the accomplishment that all the words of the ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื, which are written in ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื›ืชื•ื‘ื™ื, are also part of ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื”.

Chumash Devarim as the Source of Torah Sheba'al Peh: A Chacham's Own Sechel Revealing the Ratzon of Hashem

All this will explain something else. It says in the Zohar, ื—ืœืง ื’' ื“ืฃ ืจืก\"ื ืขืžื•ื“ ื', that Mishneh Torah, ื—ื•ืžืฉ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื, is called Torah Sheba'al Peh, it is called oral Torah. And it says there that this is the source of Torah Sheba'al Peh. As it says in Magaleh Amukos, ืื•ืคืŸ ืจืž\"ื•, that the inyan of Mishneh Torah is ืขืœ ื™ืกื•ื“ ืชื•ืจื” ืฉื‘ืขืœ ืคื” ืฉืงื‘ืœื• ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื‘ืกื•ืฃ ืž' ืฉื ื” ื‘ื›ื ื™ืกืชืŸ ืœืืจืฅ, and this is the concept of Torah Sheba'al Peh that the Yidden received at the end of the 40 years when they entered Eretz Yisrael. And this is the remez that there were 40 generations from Moshe Rabbeinu till Rebbe who wrote down the Mishnayos, who wrote down Torah Sheba'al Peh, which really means this is 40 generations from Moshe to Rav Ashi who wrote the Gemara, as the Rambam says in ื”ืงื“ืžื” to his sefer. But what's the cheshbon of 40? Just like the Yidden waited 40 years to receive the Torah Sheba'al Peh, because Torah Sheba'al Peh was given to them at the end of the 40th year, because as we said, Chumash Devarim, which was given to them at the end of the 40th year, is the inyan of Torah Sheba'al Peh, so too, in order to have the whole Torah Sheba'al Peh written, it took 40 generations. But in any event, we see here that Chumash Devarim is referred to as Torah Sheba'al Peh, and it says the source of Torah Sheba'al Peh. Why is it called Torah Sheba'al Peh? And how is it the source of Torah Sheba'al Peh? So as we said before, that the difference between Chumash Devarim and the other four chumashim was they were all given by Hashem, but the other four chumashim did not go through the ื”ืชืœื‘ืฉื•ืช, so to speak, the being put into the ืฉื›ืœ of Moshe Rabbeinu. Moshe Rabbeinu wrote it down not because he understood it, but he just wrote down the words Hashem told him. But Chumash Devarim went through the understanding of Moshe Rabbeinu. It entered Moshe Rabbeinu's ืฉื›ืœ, Moshe Rabbeinu understood it, and he wrote down what he understood. Now in truth, he wrote down the same words that he was given by Hashem, but when he wrote it down, it came after it was ืžืชืื—ื“, united with his seichel, so he wrote down what he and his seichel and his understanding understood. That's why we call it that ืžืฉื” ืžืคื™ ืขืฆืžื• ืืžืจืŸ. This is similar to the concept of Torah shebe'al peh. Because concerning Torah shebe'al peh, the oral Torah, we find two opposites. On one hand, who reveals Torah shebe'al peh? Who brings out the halachot of Torah shebe'al peh? The Bnei Yisrael, the people, the Yidden, except those things which were actually given halachah leMoshe miSinai, where it says clearly that this was given to Moshe Rabbeinu to give over to the Yidden. But most things were not halachah leMoshe miSinai. So the Yidden, the chachamim, by using the kelalim, the rules that were given to them from Moshe Rabbeinu ืžืกื™ื ื™, so they use the rules on their own, and with their own seichel, they apply the rules given to them, and they come out with the halachah. So it seems that who is the one that reveals what the Torah shebe'al peh is, what the halachah is? The seichel of the chachamim. On the other hand, what do they use their seichel for? To be megaleh, to reveal what is the will of Hashem, what are the words of Hashem. So it comes out that the halachah depends not on the understanding of the person, but depends on what Hashem wants, because Torah is chokhmato shel HaKadosh Baruch Hu, and the mitzvot are the retzono shel HaKadosh Baruch Hu, the will of Hashem. But Hashem gave over to the chachamim the tools, the ways to reveal what Hashem wants and what his chokhmah is. So it comes out that on one hand, it is the words of Hashem, nothing else. When you come to a ืคืกืง ื“ื™ืŸ based on the kelalim given by Hashem, and you come up to a maskana, to a decision, a ืคืกืง ื“ื™ืŸ, to a ruling and a psak din, that is the revelation of the will of Hashem. But at the same time, it went through the ื”ืชืœื‘ืฉื•ืช, it was put into the seichel of the chachamim. Now, such a thing should be able to happen, that you should use your own seichel, and your own seichel should be the keli that should reveal the chochmah and the ratzon of Hashem, there has to be something in the words of Moshe Rabbeinu that should be the foundation to such a concept. Like we said before, everything has to go through Moshe Rabbeinu because he was the one that passed over the Torah from Hashem to us. Everything has to go through him. And that is the ืขื ื™ืŸ of Mishneh Torah of Chumash Devarim that Moshe Rabbeinu started telling the Yidden on Rosh Chodesh Shevat, that it was the words of Hashem that went through the seichel of Moshe, and still this is part of Chumash, part of Torah. That's the yesod, the foundation to this concept that the ratzon of Hashem and the chochmah of Hashem should be able to go through the seichel of the chacham. And this is the connection between these two things that happened on Rosh Chodesh Shevat, that Moshe Rabbeinu started telling them Chumash Devarim, and Moshe Rabbeinu started explaining them the Torah in all 70 languages. Because by Moshe Rabbeinu telling them Chumash Devarim he accomplished first of all that from then on all the words of the Nevi'im u'Ketuvim should have a din of divrei Torah, just like Chumash Devarim is part of Chumash is Torah, so their words too should be Torah, not only ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื‘ื™ื, but should also be divrei Torah. He also accomplished that a Yid through his own seichel is able to reveal the chochmah of Hashem, which means that the chochmah of Hashem should be able to pass through the ื”ืชืœื‘ืฉื•ืช of the seichel of a human being, just like the words of Hashem passed through the seichel of Moshe Rabbeinu. And he also accomplished that from then on whenever a Yid learns Torah in any language, it should also have the kedushah of Torah, it should have a din of ื“ื‘ืจื™

NOW PLAYING Choose a shiur to begin Rabbi Yehuda Leib Schapiro
0:00
0:00