Zichronos book cover Zichronos is in print! Order your copy on Amazon
DAYS ON THE JEWISH CALENDAR: ADAR

Parshat Parah

How the Yerushalmi's puzzle over why Parshat Parah precedes Parshat Hachodesh, even though the parah adumah was historically commanded a day later than Rosh Chodesh Nisan, opens into the deeper teaching that parah adumah represents teshuvah, and that the one mitzvah with absolutely no reason exists precisely to keep the rest of Torah from being mistaken for human logic.

Part of Days on the Jewish Calendar: Adar · 47:09

Traces the halachic background of Parshat Parah and the Yerushalmi's question of why it is read before Parshat Hachodesh despite the parah adumah having been commanded after the Mishkan was erected, including the Rambam's ruling that its ashes must be perpetually available across all nine parahs made in history. Develops the deeper idea that parah adumah represents teshuvah, since tumat meit stems from the aveirah of the eigel just as the aveirah of eitz hadaat brought death into the world, and explains why even a tzadik needs this same inner teshuvah to shed the residue of his own ื™ืฉื•ืช. Unpacks the strange contradiction that the parah is a korban slaughtered outside all three camps yet must face the Heichal, showing how teshuvah alone can reach and purify a place even a korban cannot, and closes with why Hashem deliberately left parah adumah as the one mitzvah with no reason at all, so that the rest of Torah would never be mistaken for a wisdom limited to human understanding.

Audio Transcript
Parshat Parah's Place Among the Four Parshiyot and Its Curious Order

The class tonight will be concerning ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”. ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” means that it's a Shabbos in which we read a special portion of the Torah. For maftir, Shabbos, in the ืงืจื™ืืช ื”ืชื•ืจื”, when we read the Torah, the maftir we will read not the regular maftir of the ืคืจืฉืช ื”ืฉื‘ื•ืข, of the portion of this week, as we do in most ืฉื‘ืชื•ืช, that the last part of the parshah we just repeat for the maftir, for the last aliyah. But we read a special portion in a different place, and we take out two sifrei Torah, we read it from the second sefer Torah, and that is the portion that deals with the mitzvah of making the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. The mitzvah of burning this red cow, or whatever they call it in English, red heifer, they call it, and the Torah discusses the mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. This is one of the four ืคืจืฉื™ื•ืช. You know that before Pesach, there are four ืฉื‘ืชื•ืช. Not necessarily consecutive, but there are four ืฉื‘ืชื•ืช where we have special maftir, and they have a special name, and the four are: ืคืจืฉืช ืฉืงืœื™ื, ืคืจืฉืช ื–ื›ื•ืจ, ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”, and ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ. ืคืจืฉืช ืฉืงืœื™ื is always the Shabbos of Rosh Chodesh Adar or the one before Rosh Chodesh Adar, if Rosh Chodesh Adar is on a Shabbos. Then we read a special portion that deals with the ืžื—ืฆื™ืช ื”ืฉืงืœ, with the mitzvah of giving the half a shekel. Then, and the reason for that is because the beginning of Adar, that's when they would make the announcements in the time of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ for people to contribute the half a shekel, which was needed to buy the korbanot, the sacrifices in the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, because every year from the beginning of Nisan, they would use the new money that people would give for the korbanot, it had to be bought with the new money, so they gave a month in advance notice so people should be able to bring in. So we read ืคืจืฉืช ืฉืงืœื™ื. Then, Shabbos before Purim, we read ืคืจืฉืช ื–ื›ื•ืจ, and we talk about Amalek, because Purim has to do with Amalek, and the Shabbos before that is when we talk about remembering what Amalek did to us. Then, the Shabbos before Rosh Chodesh Nissan, or before ืฉื‘ืช ืžื‘ืจื›ื™ื ื ื™ืกืŸ, we read ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”. We read in the Torah the ืคืจืฉื” that deals with the mitzvah of making the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. And then the Shabbos after that, which is or ืฉื‘ืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ or Shabbos before Rosh Chodesh, we read ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ. ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ is the portion in the Torah where Hashem spoke to Moshe Rabbeinu while he was still in Mitzrayim. And He said to him, ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื”ื–ื” ืœื›ื ืจืืฉ ื—ื•ื“ืฉื™ื, this month should be the first month, and that's the portion of the Torah that deals with the mitzvah of establishing the months. And in that portion of the Torah, we learn about the mitzvah of the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—, of bringing the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. And since that was told, that ืคืจืฉื” was told to Moshe Rabbeinu on Rosh Chodesh Nissan, so on or around Rosh Chodesh Nissan, we have that Shabbos called ืฉื‘ืช ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ. This coming Shabbos is going to be ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”, the third of the four, the ืคืจืฉื” that deals with ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. Yerushalmi, which is the Gemara, but not the regular Gemara that we know is Talmud Bavli, but in the Talmud Yerushalmi, it says that really ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ should have come before ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”. That should have been the order. Why? Because on ืจืืฉ ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื ื™ืกืŸ, which is connected to the words ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื”ื–ื” ืœื›ื, that parashah deals with the first day of the month of Nisan. But on Rosh Chodesh Nisan, that's when the Mishkan was put up. That means almost a year later, when the Yidden were in Mitzrayim, two weeks before they leftโ€”they left Egypt on the 15th day of the month of Nisanโ€”15 days earlier, Hashem said to ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื•, ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื”ื–ื” ืœื›ื, this portion, to tell them about the korban Pesach and about Rosh Chodesh. Then they went out of Mitzrayim. Then during the next few months, they received the Torah, and Hashem commanded them to make the Mishkan. Rosh Chodesh Nisan, a year later, the Mishkan was put up. The next day, which is ื‘ืณ ื ื™ืกืŸ, the second day of ื ื™ืกืŸ, Hashem commanded them to bring the parah adumah, to make the parah adumah. So it comes out that parah adumah comes, came after the first day of Nisan. It came on the second day of Nisan. So therefore the Yerushalmi says that really ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ should be before, and after ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ, which deals with Rosh Chodesh, which is the first day of the month of Nisan, then you should have ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”, which took place the second day of Nisan, which is later. Why is it that the order is different, that we have first ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” and then we have ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ? So the Yerushalmi says, because ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” deals with ื˜ื”ืจืชืŸ ืฉืœ ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, it deals with the purity of all of the Yidden. Because what was the parah adumah done for? What was the parah adumah for? We know that if a person became ื˜ืžื ืžืช, if a person became impure by touching a dead body, so this person is tamei. Now normally, when a person becomes tamei, we know that the way to become tahor is going to the mikveh. But if you became tamei in this specific type of tumah, in this specific type of impurity, which is ื˜ื•ืžืืช ืžืช, by touching a dead body, going to the mikveh will not help you. What you have to do is that on the third and on the seventh day you have to sprinkle on the person a little bit of the ashes of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” mixed with special water, ืžื™ื ื—ื™ื™ื, and you sprinkle it on the person, and then at the end he goes to the mikveh, that will be, that is the only way that will purify this person. So the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” deals with the taharah, with the cleanliness, with the purification of the Yidden. And he says therefore the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” comes before ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ, because that is the taharah, the cleanliness, the purification of all the Yidden, which comes before ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ, which deals with the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ starts off with the mitzvah of Rosh Chodesh, and then goes on to talk about the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. But who could bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—? Only a person who is tahor. A person who is tamei cannot bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. So therefore, first you have to have the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” to make the people tahor, and then you could have the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. Therefore the order is, first ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”, then we have ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ. But the expression in the Yerushalmi is that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is ื˜ื”ืจืชืŸ ืฉืœ ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, it's the taharah, the purification of all the Yidden. What does that mean? How is it a purification of all the Yidden? It's only a purification of those Yidden who are tamei. Are all the Yidden tamei? Only those that were tamei could not bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—, so there were only few. As a matter of fact, if the majority of the Yidden were tamei, then you could bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื— on Pesach, you didn't have to even be tahor. The din is that ื˜ื•ืžืื” ื”ื•ืชืจื” ื‘ืฆื™ื‘ื•ืจ or ื˜ื•ืžืื” ื“ื—ื•ื™ื” ื‘ืฆื™ื‘ื•ืจ. If the whole ืฆื™ื‘ื•ืจ, the whole community, which means at least the majority of the community were ื˜ืžื, ื˜ืžื ืžืช, were tamei by touching a dead body, let's say how did that happen? Let's say for instance a few days before Pesach the leader passed away, and they all went to the levaya and funeral, they all became tamei, I'm just giving you an example, so when Pesach comes you could bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. If it's not the majority, then you cannot bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื— unless you're tahor, and if you were tamei you had to wait for ืคืกื— ืฉื ื™, for a month later, for Pesach, second Pesach. But if the majority were tamei, then you could bring the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื— even on the regular time. So really, to if the whole community is tamei you don't really need the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. So what does the Yerushalmi mean that the reason ืคืจื” comes before is because that's the taharah of all the Yidden? It's only the taharah of a few, or those who are tamei. But here it says the taharah of all the Yidden. Obviously, it seems from this Yerushalmi that the mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, which we have it through reading the parsha of ืคืจื”, but it seems that the mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is a mitzvah that has to do with all the Yidden, with all the Yidden. Which is strange, because it doesn't! It only has to do with those Yidden who are tamei. Obviously, at least the spiritual part of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” has to do with all the Yidden, and it is the cleanliness of all the Yidden, meaning it is the taharah, the purification of all the Yidden. Now, how is ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” the purification of all the Yidden, even of those Yidden who are not tamei? There must be something there.

Why the Ashes of the Parah Adumah Must Always Be Available

So, a little bit let's get into the halacha of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. We're not going to get into the halacha of how to make the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” or all the dinim, but one point. The Rambam in Sefer Hamitzvot, when he goes through all the mitzvot, when it comes to the mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, among the things that he says is that the mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, one of the things is that there should always be ashes of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” available for anybody who will need it. In other words, he says something interesting here. The mitzvah is not just that because there are people who might be tamei, so the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is needed to make them tahor. Part of the mitzvah is that there should always be ashes of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” available. In other words, what he's saying is that there is a constant commandment of always having ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, because we have to always have it available, because people might need it. Now, let's think: how many people really must have the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? How often is it that a person must have the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? First of all, it's only for people who are ื˜ืžืื™ ืžืชื™ื, as we said before, and even And that, you don't have to have the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. There is no mitzvah that you're not allowed to be tamei. A person could be tamei. There are definitely many laws concerning a person who's tamei. Tamei, he cannot do this, he cannot do that. He can't walk into the Beis Hamikdash, you can't bring a korban, a lot of restrictions on the person who's tamei. But there is no mitzvah for the person to become tahor. What happens if a person says, \"I'm tamei, I don't mind staying tamei. So I won't eat terumah, I won't eat a korban, I won't go to the Beis Hamikdash.\" He didn't do any aveirah. He's just missing out certain certain advantages he might have, but there's no aveirah in not becoming tahor. There is no chiyuv in him becoming tahor. The only time we find for a person that must become tahor, it says ื—ื™ื™ื‘ ืื“ื ืœื˜ื”ืจ ืขืฆืžื• ื‘ืจื’ืœ. When it comes to Yom Tov, before Yom Tov a person has to make sure he's tahor. But the truth is, even that, first of all, some say it's only mid'rabbanan, it's not even from the Torah, but besides that, it's only for those people who are planning to go up to Yerushalayim for Yom Tov. In the time of the Beit Hamikdash, there was a mitzvah of ืขืœื™ื™ื” ืœืจื’ืœ, that you have to go up for Yom Tov. And when you go up for Yom Tov, you have to go into the Beit Hamikdash, and when you go into the Beit Hamikdash, you have to bring certain korbanot, so you have to be tahor. That's why there's a ื“ื™ืŸ ื—ื™ื™ื‘ ืื“ื ืœื˜ื”ืจ ืขืฆืžื• ื‘ืจื’ืœ, you have to become tahor. But if a person is not planning to go to go up, and there were cases where people didn't have to go up, if a person was old, if a person was sick, if a person lived outside of Eretz Yisrael, he didn't have to go up to Yerushalayim for Yom Tov. If a person did not own land in Eretz Yisrael, was exempt from that obligation of going up to Yerushalayim for Yom Tov. So many people didn't have to go, so they don't have the mitzvah. So it's a very minority that have this obligation. So how many people must have the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? Not so often, and not so many. Nevertheless, there's a mitzvah that there always should be ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” available. The mitzvah, again, is not only that when a person is tamei you have to sprinkle the ashes of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” mixed with the water on this person, that's not only that's not the only part of the mitzvah. There's another part: ืœืžืฉืžืจืช, that there always has to be ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” available. In other words, it's like a constant thing. So what it comes out from the Rambam is that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is a mitzvah, but not only when you are tamei you have to sprinkle. Even when you are not tamei, in other words, even if it's not ื ื•ื’ืข to you, there is a general mitzvah that there always has to be ashes available of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, which again indicates the fact that a ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is something that's constant, not only at a time when you are tamei and if this happens, it's a constant thing. And the truth is, as it seems from the Rambam in a different place, this is a constant thing not only at one time that you should have the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, all the times that they made new ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื•ืช, it was all one continuation. And just in brief to explain, the Rambam in one place in ื”ืœื›ื•ืช ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” says that altogether, till now, there were nine ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื•ืช made. The first ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” was made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the desert, like I said, on the second day of Nisan he was commanded to make a ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, they made it, and they had a whole storage of ashes, and that was used whenever a person was ื˜ืžื, and that lasted, believe it or not, till the second Beis Hamikdash. Second Beis Hamikdash. Ezra, who rebuilt the second Beis Hamikdash, was the one that made the second ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. Then they had seven more throughout the second Beis Hamikdash. Imagine the difference in time. The first one lasted for close to a thousand years, that all those ashes. It started off in the desert, 40 years of the desert, 14 years of Gilgal, 369 years in in in Shiloh, 57 years in Nov veGivon, then 410 years of the Beis Hamikdash, I'm not counting, but it seems to be close to a thousand years. And then you had the 70 years of ื’ืœื•ืช ื‘ื‘ืœ. They had enough from those first ashes. Then they made another one, and then seven more times they needed throughout the second Beis Hamikdash, which was only 420 years. So there were nine. And then the 10th one will be made when Mashiach will come, by Mashiach, and we'll have 10, like many things we have 10. And the question that the Rebbe asks is, why does the Rambam tell us the history of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? The Rambam is not a history book, the Rambam is ื›ื•ืœื• ื”ืœื›ื”. Doesn't tell us stories of things that happened, even though they're nice things, important things, but they're not that's not the Rambam. There are other sefarim who deal with that, and not the Rambam. So the Rebbe says the Rambam wants to tell us halachah. The halachah is that there always has to be ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. So all the ashes are all like one. That's why he mentions they're all. There were nine, and those nine are one ื”ืžืฉืš, because always, always, must you have the ash of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. But anyway, all this shows is that the mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is something that's constant, and as the Yerushalmi says, it's ื˜ื”ืจืชื ืฉืœ ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ. It always has to be available and important for the taharah, for the purification of all the Yidden.

Parah Adumah as Teshuvah: Purifying Every Jew, Even the Tzadik

Now why is it? What is ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, that it's the purification of all the Yidden. So obviously, in halachah, we won't find an explanation because not everyone has to become tahor. Some, many people are tahor before. So you can't say it in the simple sense. But in the spiritual sense of what the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” means, it is important always and for everybody. What is the essential meaning of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? So I'll tell you just in one word. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” represents teshuvah, teshuvah for aveirot. Couldn't have said it better. It represents teshuvah, exactly. Why does it represent teshuvah? Because ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is the cleansing, the purification of ื˜ื•ืžืืช ืžืช, of the tumah, the impurity that comes through a dead body. The concept of mitah has to do with aveirot. Aveirot, sins, have to do with death. We see it very simple. There's a pasuk that says, ื•ืืชื ื”ื“ื‘ืงื™ื ื‘ื”ืณ ืืœืงื™ื›ื ื—ื™ื™ื. If you are connected to Hashem, your God, you're alive. The moment a person cuts off his connection in any form or shape, you lose the life. If a person does an aveirah, that means he's cutting, he cut himself off. An aveirah means you are passing away, you're cutting you off through a certain degree yourself from Hashem. The moment you are not ื“ื‘ืงื™ื ื‘ื”ืณ, you're not connected to Hashem, there's no more chayim, there is mitah. So mitah and ื˜ื•ืžืืช ืžืช, which is a result of mitah, the tumah of a ืžืช is a result of mitah, has to do with aveirot. We see it in another way also. Rashi explains in the ืคืจืฉื” of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, which is in ืคืจืฉืช ื—ืงืช, that why did Hashem say to bring a ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? Say that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is to forgive for the ื—ื˜ื ื”ืขื’ืœ, for the sin of the ืขื’ืœ, which we learn about this ืคืจืฉื”. And it uses even a mashal. The ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” was a cow, the ืขื’ืœ was a calf. So the ืœืฉื•ืŸ is let the mother come and wipe up the dirt that the child made. The calf is the baby. Just like a baby who get make place dirty, so you call the mother, come and clean up the place. You call the mother, the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, to clean up. And by bringing the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, this would forgive for the ื—ื˜ื ื”ืขื’ืœ. Now the ื—ื˜ื ื”ืขื’ืœ is the source of all sins. Now on one hand we know that the source of all sins is the ื—ื˜ื ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช, is the first aveirah which Adam HaRishon ate from the tree, Chavah ate from the tree. But the truth is the same thing reoccurred by the ื—ื˜ื ื”ืขื’ืœ because it says in Gemara that when the ื—ื˜ื ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช took place, there was a certain tumah that came into the world, into Adam Harishon, into the world. But when it came to Matan Torah, that tumah disappeared, and it came back to the same level as it was before the ื—ื˜ื ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช. Now the ื—ื˜ื ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช brought the concept of sin in the world, and from then on that was possible, but by Matan Torah that left. There was no more possibility of sin because they came back to the same level as it was before, before the ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช. But the Gemara says when they sinned with the ืขื’ืœ, ื—ื–ืจื” ื–ื•ื”ืžืชื, it came back. So it again brought back the same thing as it was before. So just like the ื—ื˜ื ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช, the source of all sins, so the ื—ื˜ื ื”ืขื’ืœ is also the source of all sins. And since the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is to forgive for the ื—ื˜ื ื”ื“ืขืช, so obviously the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is to go to counteract the inyan of sin, which is teshuvah. So ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” represents the concept of teshuvah. That's really what it is. And that is why we find an interesting thing by the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. Everyone knows that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is the chukah. It's the mitzvah which is considered a chok, chukah. Other mitzvot have reasons. Some have real reasons. Some mitzvot are mitzvot that it's out of the Torah, we would know it anyway. Some mitzvot are mitzvot that if it's not for the Torah, we wouldn't do it, but after the Torah told us, we understand why. Chukim are mitzvot that have no reason. But between the chukim itself, some of them have something, a little bit of reason, whatever, details. The mitzvah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” has no reason whatsoever. That is the chukah. Now what is so strange about ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” that they put it into the category of chukah and the biggest chukah? There's something that makes no sense here, and there's no explanation, and that's why it's a chukah. What doesn't make sense in ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? Let me tell you. People are used to thinking that the reason it's a chukah and such a big chukah is because it has two opposites. The din is that if you are tamei and you sprinkle from this ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, you become tahor. You're impure, you become pure. On the other hand, the people who are involved in preparing the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, who are tahor, become tamei. It's like a contradiction. Is it something that makes you tamei, or something that makes you tahor? On one hand, it makes you tamei, on the other hand it makes you tahor. It's a contradiction. Makes no sense. And therefore, people say this is a chukah. This is true, but not so really true. That's not such a big chukah, because don't we find in gashmiyut similar things? There are certain foods that are good for one thing and harmful for something else. There are certain medicines that have side effects. Well, it's good for your heart, but it's not good for your kidneys. It's good for, so it's possible. So the same thing: if you're tamei, it makes you tahor. It helps you. There are certain medicines that if you're weak, it'll help you, but if you're strong and you're healthy, don't take it, because it'll ruin and it'll harm. So if you're tamei, you'll become tahor, and if you're tahor, you'll become tamei. So what's the big problem?

The Real Contradiction: A Korban Burned Outside the Camp Yet Facing the Heichal

The main part why ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is a chukah is not that. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” has a different contradiction. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is a korban. The pasuk says ื—ื˜ืืช ืงืจื™ื” ืจื—ืžื ื, the Torah calls it a chatat. We know the rules of a korban means that it has to be made inside the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, in the Mishkan or in the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ. There is no such thing as shechitah of a korban outside of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ. And here this is a ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” and it had to be slaughtered, and the whole thing was done not only outside of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, ื—ื•ืฅ ืœืฉืœืฉ ืžื—ื ื•ืช, it had to go outside of the three camps. You know that Klal Yisrael in the Mishkan, in the ืžื“ื‘ืจ in the desert were divided into three camps: the ืžื—ื ื” ืฉื›ื™ื ื”, the camp of the Shechinah; the ืžื—ื ื” ืœื•ื™ื”, the camp of the Leviim; ืžื—ื ื” ื™ืฉืจืืœ, camp of the Yisrael. And that was everything, and then outside of that ืžื—ื ื”, that's called ื—ื•ืฅ ืœืžื—ื ื”, the outside of the camp. The ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” had to be burned ื—ื•ืฅ ืœืžื—ื ื”. The same thing in Eretz Yisrael, later by the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, there were also levels similar, parallel to these three. You have the ืขื–ืจื”, and then you have Yerushalayim, and then you have, but this had to be done outside of all three. Now, if this is a ืงืจื‘ืŸ, a ืงืจื‘ืŸ has to be inside, and the same ืงืจื‘ืŸ had to be done outside. Then we find something else. It says it has to be done outside of the three ืžื—ื ื•ืช, but it says you have to sprinkle the the whatever by the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, ื ื›ื—, ื ื›ื—, what's the ืคืฉื˜, the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, you have to stand facing the ืคื ื™, the face of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, of the ื”ื™ื›ืœ actually of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, the building of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ. Now here we see two opposites: is it something that belongs outside, or is it a ืงืจื‘ืŸ that's inside? And then we see it has to do with inside because you had to stand and face and look at inside. The answer is, so this is a chukah, but nevertheless, we will have an explanation for this chukah. Before the class, someone said, \"Oh, you're going to tell us the secret of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” tonight?\" So they asked, what's the class about? It's ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” we know, no one knows the reason for ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. Even Shlomo HaMelech said, \"I tried to find out.\" All the other ื—ื•ืงื™ื ืฉืœืžื” ื”ืžืœืš was so smart, figured out. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” was the only one he couldn't figure out. Hashem said to Moshe Rabbeinu, \"ื•ืœืš ืื ื™ ืžื’ืœื” ื˜ืขื ืคืจื”, to you I'll tell.\" So he asked me, \"Will you tell us the secret of ืคืจื”?\" Yeah, I'll tell you the secret of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. The problem of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is that we have this contradiction. The answer is it represents teshuvah, and that's what teshuvah is. Teshuvah means that you are able to wipe out any behavior that you did even if it's connected to the worst of the worst, to ืฉืœืฉ ืงืœื™ืคื•ืช ื”ื˜ืžืื•ืช ืœื’ืžืจื™, even to the level of ืงืœื™ืคื” which is called the three levels of ืงืœื™ืคื”. You are even beyond that. You're in a level of ืžื—ื•ืฅ ืœืฉืœืฉ ืžื—ื ื•ืช, you're beyond the three ืžื—ื ื•ืช, and the three ืžื—ื ื•ืช is, a number three is a ืจืžื–, it's beyond even the ืฉืœืฉ ืงืœื™ืคื•ืช ื”ื˜ืžืื•ืช, you go to the furthest. And teshuvah can help you. Why? Because when you do teshuvah, you connect yourself to the deepest, to the ืคื ื™, to the inside, to the deepest. So it's a korban, it has the koach of a korban, but even stronger than a korban. A korban, we don't find a korban, except in a few cases which is also an exception and there are explanations, I don't want to go into that, but a korban usually is only for a shogeg. A korban chatat is only if you did it by mistake, unintentionally. We don't find if a person went b'mezid, intentionally, to do an aveirah, he should be able to bring a korban. That doesn't help. There is an asham, certain ashamot that you could, but it's also, it's not so pashut, you have to do teshuvah even with that. But normally a korban is shogeg. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” has the koach of being mechaper even for mezid. It forgives even if you do it intentionally, like teshuvah does. And that is because it has a koach even deeper than a korban. That's why it's a korban, but it's not limited to the restriction. The restriction of a korban has to be inside, it could be outside, and still have the koach. And that's why you have to stand facing, it says, the ืคื ื™ ื”ื”ื™ื›ืœ. A korban usually is not brought in the heichal. All korbanot were brought in the azara, outside in the courtyard, not in the rooms. And here you stand, says, facing the heichal, facing the room, because that's what the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” represents. It represents this high madreigah, this this level of teshuvah, level of teshuvah that is is is very high, which is higher even than the Torah. It says like this: Hashem said you're not allowed to sin. So questions were asked of different things or individuals, what should be the advice if a person does an aveirah? So I think the first one, I don't remember exactly, but I think the first one was, midat hadin was asked: What should happen to a person? ื ืคืฉ ื”ื—ื˜ืืช, ืžื” ืชื”ื ืขืœื™ื”? What should happen to a person who sins? You know the answer? I think maybe it was, I don't remember exactly, answered: ื ืคืฉ ื”ื—ื˜ืืช ืชืžื•ืช. Go die. Well, you did an aveirah, too bad. Finally, it says they asked the ืชื•ืจื”, ื ืคืฉ ืฉื—ื˜ืื”, whatever, what should he do? So the Torah answered, ื™ื‘ื™ื ืืฉื ื•ื™ืชื›ืคืจ ืœื•. Let him bring a korban, and that'll be a kaparah. Then they asked ืฉืืœื• ืœื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ื•ื, they asked Hashem, what should be happen to a person does an aveirah? So Hashem answered, ื™ืขืฉื” ืชืฉื•ื‘ื” ื•ื™ืชื›ืคืจ ืœื•, let him do teshuvah. The difference is Torah gave an ืขืฆื” only for a shogeg. When Torah said bring a korban, it's only for a shogeg. In other words, even the Torah, as far as the Torah ื’ื•ืคื is concerned, didn't have an ืขืฆื” for a person that did ื‘ืžื–ื™ื“. Because if you do an ืขื‘ื™ืจื” ื‘ืžื–ื™ื“, intentionally, it's too bad. And only Hakadosh Baruch Hu Himself, who is higher than the Torah, He was the one that answered, it's the koach of Hashem, do teshuvah. So teshuvah connects itself so high, higher than where korbanot come from. And that's why teshuvah is in these two sides. On one hand, it's in the outside to show that it is able to penetrate and affect and clean even the worst when you're outside from all the ืžื—ื ื•ืช. And at the same time, you connect to the ืคื ื™ื, because that's the koach you have. And this is the ืคืฉื˜ that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, which represents teshuvah, is the ื˜ื”ืจื” of ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, of all the Yidden, because every single Yid has to come on to do teshuvah for something wrong that was within him. Every person. There's no such thing. The biggest tzadik. Besides the fact that we know that there is a higher level of teshuvah called, like it says in in Likkutei Torah, that it's called ื•ื”ืจื•ื— ืชืฉื•ื‘ ืืœ ื”ืืœืงื™ื ืืฉืจ ื ืชื ื”. It says that a person, even a tzadik has to do teshuvah, because his neshamah should be able to be as great as it was before it came down, because when it comes down it's not so great. So you have to do things to make the neshamah return to its original level. That's why it's called teshuvah, ืœื”ืฉื™ื‘, to come back. But that's not the type of teshuvah we're talking about. We're talking about teshuvah from getting rid of evil, of some kind of evil. Everyone has to do that. Number one, it says ืืœ ืชืืžืŸ ื‘ืขืฆืžืš, don't believe in yourself, you never know. Besides there is a pasuk that says ืื™ืŸ ืฆื“ื™ืง ื‘ืืจืฅ ืืฉืจ ื™ืขืฉื” ื˜ื•ื‘ ื•ืœื ื™ื—ื˜ื. There is no tzaddik in the world that only does good ื•ืœื ื™ื—ื˜ื and doesn't sin. So everybody has some kind. There is a level it says a person who doesn't have a sin, but still the pasuk says ืื™ืŸ ืฆื“ื™ืง ื‘ืืจืฅ, there's nobody, so Chassidus says ื•ืœื ื™ื—ื˜ื, the word ื™ื—ื˜ื, besides meaning sin, also means missing. There is no person in the world that is not missing in his avodah. He could do even better. Whatever he does, he could do even better. So that's everybody. But even there, there are, says in the Gemara, that there are four people, ื“' ืฉืžืชื• ื‘ืขื˜ื™ื• ืฉืœ ื ื—ืฉ. There are four people who died without any type of sin whatsoever, nothing missing, and they only died because of the ื ื—ืฉ. ื ื—ืฉ, the snake that caused Chava eating from the tree, he just because of him there is death in the world. There are four tzaddikim that died only because of that, had no sin. Who are the four? It was Binyamin the son of Yaakov, then there was Amram the father of Moshe. Moshe is not counted because Moshe had the maaseh with ืžื™ ืžืจื™ื‘ื”. Amram, Yishai the father of David, and Kilav the son of David. These four people. So they died because of the ื ื—ืฉ. Similarly, the Arizal had said on the Ramk, when the Ramk passed away, the Ramk, Rabbi Moshe Cordovero, who was the famous ืžืงื•ื‘ืœ, who was the teacher in Kabbalah of the Arizal, you can imagine how great he was, he passed away, the Arizal said a hesped, eulogized him, and it's written, we have the hesped that he said. It happened to be Parshas Ki Seitzei, and in Parshas Ki Seitzei it says ื•ื”ื™ื” ื›ื™ ื™ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืื™ืฉ ื—ื˜ื ืžืฉืคื˜ ืžื•ืช if you will see a person that will have a sin of ืžืฉืคื˜ ืžื•ืช that he will be judged to die, ื•ืชืœื™ืช ืื•ืชื• ืขืœ ืขืฅ you shall hang him on the tree. Then the pasuk continues, in the evening you should take him off. So he used that pasuk and he said, when you find a person that dies, but you don't know why, because there is no reason he should have died, because there is nothing wrong that he did, so the pasuk says, ื•ืชืœื™ืช ืื•ืชื• ืขืœ ืขืฅ, hang it onto the tree of the ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช. It's only because of the ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช that he died. So the Arizal said on the Ramak that he is like those four, that died for no other reason, so the Ramak was one of those that died for no other reason, but because of the ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช. So here we do have people who don't have any sin. Nevertheless, it says in Likutei Torah that the fact that the ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช affected them, that they should die, shows that there is something in them which is still not perfect. Which what's not perfect? Something that is almost impossible to get rid of. The fact the ืขืฅ ื”ื“ืขืช brought sin into the world, but the real meaning of sin is it all comes From ื™ืฉื•ืช, from your own ego, that's all sins come, you do something against Hashem. The fact that they are human beings, that's it's already called a sin, that's ego. And ego doesn't mean ego of of gaavah. Ego means the fact that you are a ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช, you are something. Actually, it says in today's Chitat, today's Tanya it says, that the greatest tzadik who loves Hashem with the greatest love, with pleasure, ื™ืฉ ืžื™ ืฉืื•ื”ื‘, there is he who loves. There is a he, there is a ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช. And that already something that you have to do teshuvah for. So every person, whoever he is, ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ have to have the ื˜ืขื of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” have to have teshuvah. Especially if a person will add and start thinking, and the Gemara says that any generation that the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ was not built in his time is as if it was destroyed in his time. That means if the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ is not built in our time, not only it just didn't happen, that means that it's as if we destroy the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ, because if we would be people who would not deserve the destruction, the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ would be rebuilt. So if a person thinks about it, the biggest tzadik thinks, after all, Mashiach didn't come yet and the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ is not rebuilt. So obviously, there is still something that I am doing that is causing the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ not to be rebuilt, which is causing the destruction of the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ. Then we know what it says that in the Gemara, the Rambam ืคืกืงื ื˜, that one deed could change the balance of the whole world, and obviously I didn't do it. It's an interesting thing that the Alter Rebbe says in a maamar, in a sefer called Boneh Yerushalayim he wrote. A interesting thing, he says if there would be one tzadik that would be 100% perfect in a generation, Mashiach would come. So obviously every tzadik, even a tzadik in himself, feels that he's still not what, why Mashiach didn't come? So every tzadik has to have this level of teshuvah, and not just teshuvah to see to reach the level the way the neshamah was before, teshuvah of getting rid of something that's within him, something that is not perfect within him. Now the truth is what I'm saying now is not his fault. The reason that imperfection that's in the person, which is ื™ืฉื•ืช, a ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช, something which is other than Hashem, it's not his fault, but that's still there. And that is something that you have to do teshuvah for. Teshuvah means you feel bad about it, as the Rambam explains, you cry about it, that's what teshuvah is. What's teshuvah? In a simple sense. Teshuvah in a simple sense means you realize I did an aveirah, there is something wrong, there is something bad, and I feel, and I regret, I feel bad, and I cry, and I want to get rid of it. A tzadik also has to have that feeling, has to have this, everybody has to feel it. Which is, by the way, the peshat in what it says in the Kitvei HaAri, the Ari writes ืœื’ื‘ื™ ืขืฉืจืช ื™ืžื™ ืชืฉื•ื‘ื”, he says any person, any person who does not cry Aseret Yemei Teshuvah, it shows that his neshamah is not complete. And the Rebbe asked a kashya: Any person? Mila a person who has aveirot and he doesn't cry Aseret Yemei Teshuvah, that shows something wrong with the guy. He did aveirot, and Aseret Yemei Teshuvah is a time when Hashem is close to you, it says ื“ืจืฉื• ื”ืฉื ื‘ื”ืžืฆืื•, ืงืจืื•ื”ื• ื‘ื”ื™ื•ืชื• ืงืจื•ื‘, ื”ืฉื is close. Hashem is close to you and you still don't care about your aveirot? Something wrong with you. But a tzadik, why should a tzadik cry? He doesn't have any aveirot. And the Ari says ื›ืœ ืžื™ ืฉืื™ื ื• ื‘ื•ื›ื”, anybody, that's including a tzadik. Now the truth is the Alter Rebbe says that sometimes the crying could come out of simchah, that a tzadik should also cry because he should be happy, like it says about Rabbi Akiva, when he heard special great new thoughts in ืชื•ืจื”, ื–ืœื’ื• ืขื™ื ื™ื• ื“ืžืขื•ืช, he cried out of joy that he heard a new peshat in Shir HaShirim. So maybe that's what it is, but the Rebbe says it's a good peshat, but then that's funny. There's one statement that says everybody has to cry ืขืฉืจืช ื™ืžื™ ืชืฉื•ื‘ื”, and for some people it's out of teshuvah and for some people out of joy? Doesn't seem that way. It seems that it's all one category. Now why would we put all category that a tzadik also, if he doesn't cry sometimes during ืขืฉืจืช ื™ืžื™ ืชืฉื•ื‘ื”, that shows that there is something wrong with him? Why? So the Rebbe says yes, even the tzadik has to cry for the same reasons: also out of teshuvah, but not the same type of teshuvah, not for sins, but the same idea. What's a sin? A sin means that you've got something wrong with you, there is some negative part in you, there's some klipah, evil within you. A tzadik also has this. What does he have? He has the ื™ืฉื•ืช, he has the fact that he's a person, the fact that he's a human being, and he's a ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช. The fact that he is I. That's something that that that he can't help, that's a fact. But still it's something that's not Hashem, and the fact it's not Hashem, there is something that you have to cry about. But then the Rebbe asks, but then why should he cry if he can't help it anyway? Mila about teshuvah of somebody who cries because crying through teshuvah it'll wipe it out, this he can't help. And the Rebbe says it's not true. If the tzadik will cry and do teshuvah, this crying itself will take away his ื™ืฉื•ืช, that he take will not be a ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช. He'll be a physical being, and he will not feel anything, which I believe is like it says by the Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai. Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai said ืื ื ืื ื ืกื™ืžื ื ื‘ืขืœืžื, I am only a siman, I'm only a hint to Hashem, that's all I am. My ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช is an expression of Hashem's will, that's all it is. And he felt it. In other words, there was no he. Not like he loves Hashem. The moment you say he loves Hashem, that there is a he, which is already somebody, something, and that's not Hashem. ืื™ืŸ ืขื•ื“ ืžืœื‘ื“ื•, there is nothing but Hashem. How could there be a he? Hashem created it, but still the fact is, it's not his fault, Hashem made it, but it's a he. Or when a guy would say, \"I,\" the moment you say \"I\", who am I? What do you mean \"I\"? There's no such thing as \"I\". There's this still famous story that somebody came from the Maggid, and he passed by one of the chaverim, and he knocked on the door in the middle of the night, and his chaver, who was another talmid in the Maggid, was learning, and he hears someone knock on the door, he says, \"Who is it?\" He says, \"I.\" He wouldn't open the door for him. A long time, wouldn't open the door. So finally, he opened the door, and he said to him, \"Where are you coming from?\" \"I'm coming from the Maggid.\" He said, \"You better go back. You didn't learn anything. If you still could say 'I', it shows that you didn't really learn.\" Because there's no such thing as \"I\". But there is. There is \"I\" to mitzvot. Even that, \"I\" learn Torah. There is somebody. But as long as that \"I\" is felt, there's something wrong. And that's what even a tzadik has to do teshuvah for. Teshuvah means not doing teshuvah for aveirot, but doing feeling bad and regretting and that wipes out even that \"I\" and he becomes completely. And that's the pshat the Yerushalmi that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, which represents teshuvah, to get rid of the ืฉืœืฉ ืงืœื™ืคื•ืช or the ืงืœื™ืคื” that's there, the evil that's there, ื˜ื”ืจืชื ืฉืœ ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, that's for all the Yidden. And that's why it comes before Parshat Hachodesh. Parshat Hachodesh, which deals with the korban Pesach, that has to do with tzadikim. Korban Pesach, it says, was the time Yidden went out of Mitzrayim. When they went out of Mitzrayim, they were like newborn people. So the past doesn't count. So they were like tzadikim. But even a tzadik first has to do teshuvah. That's why Parshat Parah comes before Parshat Hachodesh, because that's the taharah of all the Yidden, it's the purification of every single Yid, whether he's a rasha, chas veshalom, he has to have the taharah, if he is a benoni, he has to have it, even if he is a tzadik gamur, completely has to have a taharah to some degree of the fact that there is a ืžืฆื™ืื•ืช in the world. And then you're forced to come to Parshat Hachodesh. That's what the Yerushalmi means that Parshat Parah comes before.

Why Parah Adumah Has No Reason: Guarding Against Reducing Torah to Human Logic

But then there is another point, a different inyan just for a few minutes in why ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is so important. In other words, why the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is so important, to bring the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” physically, but also the learning about it, and the reading of the Torah, which is the time when we discuss ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” and we understand it. Why is that so important and that comes in before Parshat Hachodesh, and why it's important for klal Yisrael, for everybody? Because the question we ask is that ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is only for the people who are tamei, but people who are not tamei, what do they need the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” for? But there is something in the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, and it's even more in the learning and understanding of it than in the actual doing it, that is ื ื•ื’ืข to everybody. And I'll just, in short, explain it. I said before, ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is a chukah. It's one of the chukim, one of those mitzvot that have no reason. Not only that, it is the chukah. It is the one chukah which is more than everyone every other chukah. All other chukim, there are not many, but all other chukim have somewhat of a reason somebody could understand. ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is a complete chukah, completely. Whatever the reason why it how we explain the the chukah, but it's a chukah. That is the chukah. What is the reason why Hashem gave us one mitzvah which is a chukah? The chukah, a few chukim and the one which is a complete chukah. What is the reason? What would Hashem care if He would make us know the reason? He told Moshe Rabbeinu the reason. Tell everybody! Why didn't He not tell the reason of of of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? I'll tell you why. The truth is, the whole Torah, the whole Torah is beyond our understanding. It's impossible for us to understand. Why? Because the Torah is Hashem's wisdom. And Hashem's wisdom is infinite. It's impossible for a finite brain to grasp, to contain as an infinite as an infinite wisdom. It's impossible. But Hashem had some kind of pity on us, and He gave us some kind of understanding in different mitzvot that we should have some kind of Otherwise, it would be very hard to do it. But what Hashem wants is that we shouldn't for a moment forget and start thinking that the mitzvot that we have, the mitzvot that we learn about, are mitzvot that make sense in our level that we're able to understand it. If every single mitzvah would make sense 100%, you know what would be? We would forget for a moment this is the wisdom of God. We would think, yeah, this is like other types of sciences that they make sense. Some things are harder, some things are easier. There are such deep ืขื ื™ื ื™ื in science, too, and some people understand more, some people less. But generally, it's logic, it's ืฉื›ืœ, which is limited, which is part of the creation. The truth is, it's not. The Torah, the Torah is beyond creation. It's beyond our understanding, beyond completely. So Hashem left at least one mitzvah, at least one, that should make no sense whatsoever, should be a chukah. And when we see that, that reminds us constantly, you should know that this is beyond our understanding, this is The wisdom of Hashem which we can't understand. And then we start realizing that the the parts that we do understand of Torah, this is also only, it's not a drop in the bucket, nothing to what it really is. But this is what reminds us. This is what really one of the main things of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. That's why it says when it starts off the parashah of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, there's an interesting expression. Those who hear, we'll read it Shabbos, it says: ื•ื™ื“ื‘ืจ ื”ืฉื ืืœ ืžืฉื” ืœืืžืจ, Moshe said, ื–ืืช ื—ืงืช ื”ืชื•ืจื”, this is the chukah of the Torah, and it goes on: Take a ืคืจื”, a red cow, etc., etc. What does it mean this is the chukah of the Torah? It should have said, ื–ืืช ื—ืงืช ื”ืคืจื”, this is the law of the ืคืจื”. Like by the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. You look at the parashah of the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—, it starts off with the words ื–ืืช ื—ืงืช ื”ืคืกื—. Hashem says, this these are the laws of the Pesach, and it goes on this is what you should do and that, etc., etc. So here it should be the same: This is the laws of the ืคืจื”, do this and this. It says, ื–ืืช ื—ืงืช ื”ืชื•ืจื”. What it really means is, this is the whole Torah. Chukah of the Torah, which is the essence of the whole Torah, is ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”. It is through ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” that we get the understanding that the Torah is truly the wisdom of Hashem, and it's completely infinite, completely beyond our understanding. And that's why the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” is the first thing, it's an introduction before we get to the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. The ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื— is the first mitzvah that the Yidden had. The Yidden had other mitzvot that were the seven mitzvot that the goyim also had. The Yidden had the mitzvah of milah which was given to Avraham Avinu. They had the the mitzvah of ื’ื™ื“ ื”ื ืฉื” if it was given then or not, okay, whatever. The first mitzvah the Yidden were given when they became a nation was the mitzvah of ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. Now, that was the first mitzvah, and from that on, or the mitzvah of ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื”ื–ื” ืœื›ื, the mitzvah of ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉ ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ, a mitzvah of making the month, which was what Moshe Rabbeinu was told in Mitzrayim yet as a mitzvah. So before we start the mitzvot, which is beginning of learning about, it's Torah, Hashem had to give it an introduction. We need an introduction to tell you, remember, don't think this is wisdom and sechel like everything else, this is from Hashem. And that's why before ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ, which is the beginning, talks about the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—, talks about ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื”ื–ื” ืœื›ื, the Shabbos before yet, you have to have the mitzvah of parah. Because then you understand parah is a chokah, that there is a chokah, and the chokah is something that shows us that it's not from sechel, it's purely from Hashem. Then when you have that introduction, then you can continue. Then you can go into this ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉ ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ. ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉ ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ is a very logical thing. It's a very complicated understanding because it's astronomy, but it's logic, it's sechel. ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื— has a reason, we understand why we made a ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—. But before we start in logic, we have to have the introduction of the ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื”. And that's also the pshat in the Yerushalmi when the Yerushalmi says that really ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” should come after ืคืจืฉืช ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ, because ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ is ืจืืฉ ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื ื™ืกืŸ, ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” was told to them the second day of Nisan. But nevertheless, we have to start with ืคืจืฉืช ืคืจื” before, because it's the taharah of all the Yidden. What it means is, this is the taharah, the purification, the cleansing of a Yid's's mind in order to be a vessel to receive the Torah, the mitzvot and the Torah, you have to have first the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, because that's the chokah. And when you have that chokah, you come with the proper approach to mitzvot and Torah. And then when you go on, all the mitzvot that started from the ื”ื—ื•ื“ืฉ ื”ื–ื” ืœื›ื, from the ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—, and you go on, as much as you understand it, you'll always remember it's all the wisdom of Hashem. And when you have that proper understanding, then we do the mitzvot in the right way. Not only do we do the chukim in a way of doing the will of Hashem, but even when we do the mishpatim which make sense, we don't do it because they make sense, we do it because Hashem said so, this is the will of Hashem, and this is the whole ืชื›ืœื™ืช. Mashiach will come, then we will see the real reason of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, and then it won't matter that we see, because we'll have this feeling anyway that everything's from Hashem. So then Hashem could tell us the reason. Now if He would tell us the reason, we would lose that. We would think, oh, everything has a reason, everything makes sense, so it's not so great, not so special. Hashem left it now for us not to understand. I'll repeat this, I always say this in the same thing, that when I had once a discussion with somebody and he said, 'How could you do all these mitzvot, some of them don't make sense?' So my answer to him was, 'That's why I do it. If all the mitzvot would make sense, I probably wouldn't do it. If everything made sense to me, it would mean that it was given, written by somebody in my level, smarter than me, but the best proof is I can understand it, so maybe I could have thought of it myself. The fact that it doesn't make sense is not a question, but on the contrary, that's why I understand that it is God-given, that it's something that's not, beyond me. I have a question, how do I understand some parts? The fact that I don't understand is not a question.' But that's only now. When Mashiach will come, we'll understand everything, and still we will have the proper approach to mitzvot, and we will do everything because Hashem wants. And we hope we won't have to wait long for this, but very, very soon, we'll be able to do it in that way, bimheirah v'yameinu mamash. Amen. Yeah, any questions? I knew I had to go to class, yeah? Don't you have a question? Yes. Well, so I know that you spent the whole hour saying we don't know, this is one of them, but does anyone is there any speculation about why cows, red? How could you speculate? What does Rashi, Rashi says like this: that when Hashem gave us ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”, this chukah, He said, \"I know that you will be bothered by the ืฉื˜ืŸ, and by the ื’ื•ื™ื, and by the ื™ืฆืจ ื”ืจืข: Why do you do this? It makes no sense. So I'm telling you, do it because I said so.\" And then Rashi uses this expression, that ืื™ืŸ ืœืš ืจืฉื•ืช ืœื”ืจื”ืจ ืื—ืจื™ื•, you have no permission to think about it. Not to say you have no permission not to do it, you have no permission to think about it. Then you could ask, then what was the whole class about, then why did we go into it? I don't know. Yes. We have a Gemara where ื˜ื•ืžืืช ืžืช is the worst thing, and every Jew is in need of teshuvah, even the ืฆื“ื™ืงื™ื, why didn't, why wouldn't they all avail themselves of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื”? Okay, physically it's only if you are physically ื˜ืžื. It represents the spiritual ื˜ื•ืžืื”, so physically only those people who actually became ื˜ืžื. It doesn't, not always does it fit that everything that spiritual means to you, you have to do it physically too. Certain people do it physically because they are in the lower level of actually ื˜ืžื, and the higher level don't have to do it physically, but spiritually they have to do it. Just like now, we don't have a ืคืจื”, a ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” for anybody, and still everybody has to do it spiritually. Do we have... but you said that it had to be continuous. Now we're missing it. And now we have none? I guess they're hidden someplace. I guess the ashes are hidden someplace. We'll find them. Must be. Huh? No. No. No, they had the ashes of the ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” after the ื—ื•ืจื‘ืŸ also. It has nothing to do with the ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ. You just can't make a ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” when there's no ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ. But the ashes you could sprinkle it. If we had ashes of ืคืจื” ืื“ื•ืžื” now, we could become tahor, we could go in there. You know why the, why ash, ashes parsha falls four weeks like from month one? Well, because of Pesach. It's called in Yiddish, a zach, a zach, un es firt zich, and it just happened to be that way. And then Parah is before ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื—, and ืงืจื‘ืŸ ืคืกื— is Nisan, I mean that's, that's how, that's what it's about, yeah.

← PREVIOUS
Parshat Zachor
NEXT →
7 Adar
NOW PLAYING Choose a shiur to begin Rabbi Yehuda Leib Schapiro
0:00
0:00