Rabbi Schapiro on the Parshah: Chayei Sarah
Why Rashi Says a Servant's Small Talk Outranks the Torah of the Righteous
Part of Bereishit · 17:55
Rashi says Eliezer's ordinary conversation about finding a wife for Yitzchak is "greater" than the Torah studied by later generations. An exploration of how sincere, God-directed speech about mundane things actually sustains the world's ongoing creation.
Audio Transcript
In Parshas Chayei Sarah, the Torah tells us the whole story of how Eliezer was sent by Avraham to find a wife for Yitzchak, and the Torah tells us all the details of what happened and how he found Rivkah, and then the Torah repeats the whole story again when Eliezer told it over to Besuel and Lavan. And Rashi says there in ืงืคืืื ื\"ื ืคืกืืง ื\"ื that ืืคื ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช, then Rashi continues ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, which means that here we see that the ืฉืืืชื, which means the speech, the words of the slaves of the Avot is greater, better, than the Torah of the children. Because we see that ืืจืื ืืืคื ืชืืจื ืื ื ืืชื ื ืืื ืืจืืืื, many very major, important things of the Torah were only given through a hint, sometimes through one extra letter, a ื' for instance, we learn out many, many halachot, and nevertheless the Torah goes into the details of the sichah, of the speech, of the talking of Eliezer who was from the ืขืืืื of the Avot. So from here we see that ืืคื ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, that the speech of the ืขืืื ืืืืช is greater, is better than the Torah of the ืื ืื. But Lechorah, we have to understand what is the pshat. How can we say that sichah, which is plain talk so to speak, should be greater than Torah? Even though it is sichah of ืขืืื ืืืืช, but nevertheless it is only sichah, and sichah just means plain talk, which is not Torah. Now how is it possible that plain talk should be greater than Torah? And the truth is that when we say here greater than Torah, we don't only mean greater than the Torah the way it was before Matan Torah, but we mean greater than the Torah of the ืื ืื the way it is after Matan Torah. Because we see that the example given is that we see that many halachot were only written ืืจืืืื, only hinted, while the story of the ืขืืื ืืืืช is written in detail twice, so we see that we're referring to the Torah the way it is after Matan Torah. And nevertheless we say that the sichah, the just plain talk of the ืขืืื ืืืืช is greater than the Torah of the ืื ืื.
The truth is that even the Torah of before Matan Torah is not the same as the Torah after Matan Torah, as it says in Midrash Shir HaShirim Rabbah, ืคืจืฉื ื' ื', that ืื ืืฉืืจืืช ืฉืืืจื ืืคื ืื ืืืืืช ืจืืืืช ืืื, that all the ืฉืืจืื that the Avos said to you, which means the Torah that they learned was only like a smell, but we have the essence of the Torah. So even the Torah that was learned by the Avos is not the same at all, no comparison to the Torah that Hashem' gave to the ืื ืื later on. Certainly the sichah of before Matan Torah, the just plain talk of the ืขืืื ืืืืช certainly doesn't compare to the Torah. So how can we say that ืืคื ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื? And the question becomes even stronger if we're going to be medayek in the exact expression of this ืืืืจ ืื\"ื. The lashon is that the ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช is better ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, from the their Torah of the ืื ืื. It doesn't say ืืืชืืจื ืฉื ืืื ืื, but ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, which means their Torah. We find in the Gemara in Kiddushin ืืฃ ื\"ื ืขืืื ื' and also in Avodah Zarah ืืฃ ื\"ื ืขืืื ื', that there are two stages in learning Torah. There is a time when the Torah is called Torat Hashem', Hashem's Torah, and then there is a time when it is called Torah, his Torah. Which means in the beginning when the person just starts learning the Torah, the Torah is still called ืชืืจืช ื', Hashem's Torah, but when he starts learning and the Torah becomes one with him, then the Torah is called Torah, it is his Torah, till he even becomes a baal habayis so to speak over the Torah. This is the highest level a person could reach in learning Torah, that not only is he a separate being and the Torah a separate being, the Torah is Hashem's, and he learns Hashem's Torah, but the highest level is if the Torah becomes part of him, it is so to speak his Torah, his whole being is the Torah. Here since the expression is ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, so it comes out that we're saying that there is a maalah in the speech of the ืขืืื ืืืืช even in their Torah of the banim, which means even in the level the way the banim, the Yidden, learn Torah and become united with the Torah, still there is a maalah in the sichah, in the talk of the ืขืืื ืืืืช. And the question is, how can we say that there is a maalah in the sichah of the ืขืืื ืืืืช over the Torah of the banim?
To understand this, we first have to bring in what the Gemara says in Sanhedrin ืืฃ ืฆ\"ื ืขืืื ื'. There the Gemara says ืืืจ ืจืื ืืืขืืจ: ืื ืืื ืืขืื ื ืืจื. Every person was born, was created to toil, to work hard, ืฉื ืืืจ ืฉื ืืืจ, as the pasuk says in Iyov: ืื ืืื ืืขืื ืืืื. A person was born to toil, to work hard. And then the Gemara continues: ืืื ื ืืืืข ืื ืืขืื ืคื ื ืืจื, ืื ืืขืื ืืืืื ื ืืจื. I don't know if he was created for toiling of the mouth or toiling of work. ืืฉืืื ืืืืจ, when he brings a pasuk where it says, ืื ืืืฃ ืขืืื ืคืืื, ืืื ืืืืจ ืืขืื ืคื ื ืืจื. From this pasuk where it mentions the word ืคืืื, which is the mouth, so we understand that a person was created to toil by mouth. ืืขืืืื ืืื ื ืืืืข, I still don't know, ืื ืืขืื ืชืืจื, ืื ืืขืื ืฉืืื. Was a person created to toil to learn Torah or he was created to toil in speech? ืืฉืืื ืืืืจ, but when the pasuk says ืื ืืืืฉ ืกืคืจ ืืชืืจื ืืื ืืคืื, that this sefer Torah should not stay away from your mouth, ืืื ืืืืจ, so from here we know that ืืขืื ืชืืจื ื ืืจื. The person was created to toil in learning Torah. So we see here in the Gemara that there was a hava amina, there was a sevara to say that the person was created ืืขืื ืฉืืื, to toil in speech, in talking. Now this is not understood. How was there a hava amina? How would we lechatchila think that the person was created to talk rather than to learn Torah? It's self-understood that the whole purpose of a person's being in the world is to learn Torah, so why would we think that there is a maalah, there is something better in sichah, in just talk, over the inyan of learning Torah?
So the Tzemach Tzedek in his Sefer Or HaTorah explains that the Gemara does not mean ืขืื ืฉืืื, plain talk, devarim beteilim or things like that, chas veshalom. But what does the word sichah means when you talk things which are not Torah, but it is spoken l'shem shamayim. It is spoken for the sake of Hashem, for the sake of mitzvot, but the talk itself is not the inyan of Torah. Which is connected to another place where we find the expression of sichah, and that is in the Gemara Avodah Zarah ืืฃ ืืดื ืขืืื ืืณ, that ืฉืืืช ืืืืื ืฉื ืชืืืืื ืืืืื ืฆืจืืืื ืืืืื. That the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื, the simple secular talk of talmidei chachamim also has to be learned. So there too we find an expression sichah, and there we use the expression ืฉืืืช ืืืืื, their talk of ืืืืื, secular talk, simple talk. But nevertheless, since it is ืฉืืืช ืืืืื of ืชืืืืื ืืืืื, you have to learn that too, because the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื of ืชืืืืื ืืืืื is also l'shem Shamayim, and it also is in order to serve Hashem, even though it is not ืฉืืื of Torah, it is not talking of Torah. But nevertheless, it is definitely l'shem Shamayim. And this is connected to what it says in ืคืจืงื ืืืืช ืคืจืง ืืณ ืืฉื ื ืืดื: ืืื ืืขืฉืื ืืืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื, that whatever you do should be l'shem Shamayim. And there, it doesn't mean that you should do mitzvot, because that is not called ืืขืฉืื, that is not your maasim. The mitzvot are the maasim of Hashem. When it says ืืื ืืขืฉืื ืืืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื, it means your own maasim. When a person does his own thing, so to speak, when a person eats, which is his own maaseh, something that he does that is not a mitzvah, it is a secular thing, so to speak, or when he goes to work, or he does the other thing that he does because of his physical needs, nevertheless the Mishnah says ืืื ืืขืฉืื ืืืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื, they should all be l'shem Shamayim. Which is also the idea of what it says in the pasuk in ืืฉืื, ืงืคืืื ืืณ ืคืกืืง ืืณ: ืืื ืืจืืื ืืขืื, in all your ways you should know Him. And here too it is not talking about mitzvot, because the mitzvot are not called ืืจืืื, your ways, they are called ืืจืื ืืฉื, the ways of Hashem. When it says ืืื ืืจืืื, know your ways, it refers to the things a person does not because they are mitzvot, but he does them because he, as a human being, needs to do it. They are his ways. Nevertheless, ืืื ืืจืืื ืืขืื, in all your ways you have to know Him. And this is the pshat in the Gemara in Sanhedrin, when the Gemara says that there is a hava amina that ืืื ืืขืื ืืืื means that a person was born for ืขืื ืฉืืื, to toil in speech. It means the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื which is l'shem Shamayim, that he should speak and get involved in secular things l'shem Shamayim, because it is a great avodah to serve Hashem l'shem Shamayim even when you are not doing mitzvot. So the hava amina in the Gemara is that maybe this is the most important thing, the inyan of ืขืื ืฉืืื, the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื of ืชืืืืื ืืืืื, the inyan of doing your own thing l'shem Shamayim. But the question is, why would we think that this is greater than Torah? Why would we think that a person was created for that rather than Torah? Because lichorah, as great as ืื ืืขืฉืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื and ืืื ืืจืืื ืืขืื is, certainly it doesn't come to the inyan of learning Torah, because learning Torah is a commandment of Hashem, Torah is the chochmah of Hashem. So why would we think that ืฉืืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื, which really includes the whole concept of ืืขืฉืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื, should be greater than the inyan of learning Torah?
So the Tzemach Tzedek explains that we find an expression in the Zohar ืืืง ื' ืืฃ ืงื\"ื ืขืืื ื' when it refers to the creation of the world by Hashem as ืืืืื ืืืืืืื, secular simple things, because concerning Hashem the creation of the world is ืืืืื ืืืืืืื. So ืืืืื ืืืืืืื is similar to the inyan of ืฉืืืช ืืืืื, because ืืืืื means simple things, ืฉืืืช ืืืืื also means they're secular things, they're not important things. We also find a connection between the creation of the world and the inyan of speech, because we know that ืืขืฉืจื ืืืืจืืช ื ืืจื ืืขืืื, that Hashem created the world with the ten statements, with the ten sayings. So it was ืฉืืื, it was speech of Hashem that created the world. We say in the piyutim on ืจืืฉ ืืฉื ื, ืืื ืืืคืืจ, ืืื ืฉื ืืืื, he spoke and it became. This refers to the creation of the world. So there we use the term ืฉื, which is from the same word of ืฉืืื. So we see a connection between Hashem's creating the world through the ืขืฉืจื ืืืืจืืช, through the speaking, which is considered ืืืืื ืืืืืืื, to the inyan of ืฉืืืช ืืืืื of a person. Now we know that in order for Hashem to recreate the world every second, because the truth is Hashem did not just create the world once and then the world continues to exist by itself chas veshalom, but ืืืืืฉ ืืืืื ืืื ืืื ืชืืื ืืขืฉื ืืจืืฉืืช, ืืฉื renews the creation everyday, and the truth is not everyday, but every moment, every second, constantly Hashem recreates the world. Now we know that in order for the different things to happen above by Hashem, it depends on our avodah, it depends what we do down here. As there's the famous pshat of the Mezritcher Maggid, which is printed in his Sefer Or Torah ืืฃ ืงื\"ื ืขืืื ื', on the Mishnah where it says in ืคืจืงื ืืืืช in the second ืคืจืง, ืืฉื ื ื', ืืข ืื ืืืขืื ืืื, you should know what's above you. So he explained that it means, ืืข, you should know, that ืื ืืืขืื, that what happens above, ืืื, it comes from you, that what we do down here, that has an effect by Hashem, and that causes Hashem to do the different things. Not because ืืก ืืฉืืื ืืฉื couldn't do them, but the way Hashem created the world is that everything should depend on ืขืืืืช ืืืื, everything should depend on the people. And therefore we are told about certain things that in order to be meorer, to awaken so to speak l'ma'alah by Hashem certain things, we have to do down here things which are similar, and when we do that, this awakens the same thing above, using the terms of Kabbalah, that when we have an ืืชืขืจืืชื ืืืชืชื, an awakening down here, so this is meorer, this awakens an ืืชืขืจืืชื ืืืขืืื, an awakening from above, that the similar thing to what we did down here will happen from above. And we know that, taken also from the Gemara, that Hashem acts with us midah keneged midah, measure for measure. So when we do something, so Hashem from above will do a similar thing. For instance, if we want Hashem to act to us in a form of tzedakah, we know that we don't deserve all the things we want Hashem to give us, but we want him to give it to us in a form of tzedakah, in order to be meorer that, we have to do the mitzvah of tzedakah down here. When we show Hashem that we also give to somebody who so to speak might not deserve, so Hashem too will do the same thing to us. And the same is with everything, that in order to be meorer the same the thing above, we have to do something similar. So there must be something similar to the inyan of the ืขืฉืจื ืืืืจืืช of Hashem, which is the sichah, the speech of ืืืืื ืืืืืืื, the speech concerning the secular simple things by Hashem, so there's something that we have to do in ืขืืืืช ืืฉื, in our service of Hashem, that will be similar to that, that will awaken by Hashem, that he will also say the sichah of the ืขืฉืจื ืืืืจืืช in order to create the world, which is ืืืืื ืืืืืืื. And what is that? That is the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื. When we have the simple speech not of Torah, but ืฉืืืช ืืืืื, but that is done l'shem Shamayim, it is done for the sake of Hashem, so then this is meorer, there should be the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื, so to speak, the speech of the ืืืืื ืืืืืืื by Hashem to create the world. Which means that when we learn Torah, which is the chochmah of Hashem, it is not ืฉืืืช ืืืืื ืืก ืืฉืืื, it is not ืืืืื ืืืืืืื ืืก ืืฉืืื, it is not simple, ordinary, secular things, so by doing that, we bring down into the world a much higher level of kedushah. We bring down into the world a light, so to speak, which is beyond the creation, which is so to speak, the ืืืจ ืืืฉ, a new light which is beyond the creation of the world. But first we have to do something that Hashem will make the creation of the world, speak the ืฉืืืช ืืืืื, and then we're able to bring a higher level of light into the world, which is from a level deeper within Hashem, not just the inyan of ืฉืืืช ืืืืื.
And this is what the Gemara meant. The hava amina of the Gemara is maybe the person was created for ืขืื ืฉืืื, which means to speak ืฉืืืช ืืืืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื. And this is a hava amina that this is the whole purpose of the person, because when you do this l'shem Shamayim, this brings about that Hashem will recreate the world. The maskana of the Gemara is that this is not so, the purpose is ืขืื ืชืืจื. But it doesn't mean that it takes away from the hava amina. The hava amina remains. The question was which of the two is more important. The maskana is that more important is the Torah, because the most important thing is to bring the higher level of light of kedushah into the world. But nevertheless, it also remains that the ืขืื ืฉืืื is also important, because this is what makes Hashem recreate the world. And this is what Rashi could mean when he says ืืคื ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, that there is a maalah in ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช. There's a maalah in sichah, just like by Eliezer. He spoke ordinary, secular things. There was a story there concerning finding a shidduch, etc., etc. But he did this leshem Shamayim. It was for the sake of Hashem, it was for the sake of his master Avraham, who wanted to do this because this was the thing Hashem wanted him to do. So his sichah there was leshem Shamayim. So there is a maalah in the sichah leshem Shamayim even over Torah, because this continues the creation of the world. On the other hand, Torah is greater, Torah's more important, but nevertheless, there is a maalah also in the inyan of sichah. But the condition is that you have to be ืขืืื ืืืืช, you have to feel yourself like an eved. Just like Eliezer was an eved of Avraham, and he felt himself as an eved of Avraham. As he started, when he started speaking to Betuel and Lavan, he said ืขืื ืืืจืื ืื ืื. That's his whole being, that he was an eved of Avraham. And Avraham was the tzaddik, which means Avraham's whole metziut was only kedushah. So he was an eved of kedushah. So when a person is an eved, an eved of Hashem, so then the person is able to speak the sichah leshem Shamayim, and that sichah, which is done l'shem Shamayim, being an eved of Hashem, brings about that Hashem recreates the world. And therefore, it says ืืคื ืฉืืืชื ืฉื ืขืืื ืืืืช ืืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, that there is a maalah in the sichah of ืขืืื ืืืืช over the Torah of ืื ืื. It doesn't mean that it's greater in everything. There is a specific maalah in it, and the maalah is that this brings about the creation of the world, while Torah brings a new light into the world. So definitely, Torah is much greater than that, but what we're trying to say here is that there is also a maalah in the sichah of ืขืืื ืืืืช over ืชืืจืชื ืฉื ืื ืื, which means there's a maalah in ืื ืืขืฉืื ืืฉื ืฉืืื ืืืื ืืจืืื ืืขืื.